|
Security
and Liberty
by
Ron Paul
by Ron Paul
DIGG THIS
The senseless
and horrific killings last week on the campus of Virginia Tech University
reinforced an uneasy feeling many Americans experienced after September
11th: namely, that government cannot protect us. No matter how many
laws we pass, no matter how many police or federal agents we put
on the streets, a determined individual or group still can cause
great harm. Perhaps the only good that can come from these terrible
killings is a reinforced understanding that we as individuals are
responsible for our safety and the safety of our families.
Although Virginia
does allow individuals to carry concealed weapons if they first
obtain a permit, college campuses within the state are specifically
exempted. Virginia Tech, like all Virginia colleges, is therefore
a gun-free zone, at least for private individuals. And as we witnessed,
it didnt matter how many guns the police had. Only private
individuals on the scene could have prevented or lessened this tragedy.
Prohibiting guns on campus made the Virginia Tech students less
safe, not more.
The Virginia
Tech tragedy may not lead directly to more gun control, but I fear
it will lead to more people control. Thanks to our media
and many government officials, Americans have become conditioned
to view the state as our protector and the solution to every problem.
Whenever something terrible happens, especially when it becomes
a national news story, people reflexively demand that government
do something. This impulse almost always leads to bad laws
and the loss of liberty. It is completely at odds with the best
American traditions of self-reliance and rugged individualism.
Do
we really want to live in a world of police checkpoints, surveillance
cameras, and metal detectors? Do we really believe government can
provide total security? Do we want to involuntarily commit every
disaffected, disturbed, or alienated person who fantasizes about
violence? Or can we accept that liberty is more important than the
illusion of state-provided security?
I
fear that Congress will use this terrible event to push for more
government-mandated mental health programs. The therapeutic nanny
state only encourages individuals to view themselves as victims,
and reject personal responsibility for their actions. Certainly
there are legitimate organic mental illnesses, but it is the role
of doctors and families, not the government, to diagnose and treat
such illnesses.
Freedom is
not defined by safety. Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens
to live without government interference. Government cannot create
a world without risks, nor would we really wish to live in such
a fictional place. Only a totalitarian society would even claim
absolute safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total
state control over its citizens lives. Liberty has meaning
only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a
false government security blanket beckons.
April
25, 2007
Dr. Ron
Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
Ron
Paul Archives
|