Victim Disarmament At Sea
by Félix Moreno de la Cova Solís
by
Félix Moreno de la Cova Solís
DIGG THIS
As Eric
Margolis points out the rise of piracy off the coast of Somalia
is directly related to the 2006 US-backed Ethiopian invasion and
the decades of US involvement in the region since the fall of Mohammed
Siad Barre in 1991. In fact the very same fighters driven north
towards the tip of The Horn by the fall of Mogadiscio, to Ethiopian
driven US tanks, are involved in the attacks on international shipping.
Hijackings
in 2005 were in the single digits, rose to a dozen in 2006, doubled
after the Christmas invasion to over 30 and when the tally is done
will have more than doubled again in 2008.
It is hardly
unusual historically for pirates to be ex-combatants. Colin Woodard’s
book "The
Republic of Pirates" paints a vivid picture of losers of
dynastic struggles or jobless privateers decommissioned after a
peace treaty is signed finding new careers as buccaneers on The
Spanish Main. Interestingly their progress from canoes and night
surprise attacks on larger ships to commanding true fleets of captured
warships parallels the way that their modern pirates have slowly
built up their capacity and range, with "mother ships"
which allow their speedboats to reach thousands of miles from their
coastal village bases as this Map
of their attacks shows. Their popularity in those villages is also
an important factor, as the ability to disappear in the crowd and
spend their ill-gotten gains makes the whole game worth it and attracts
more young Somalis to their ranks.
However, by
far the most interesting thing about this 21st century
resurgence of piracy is how modern States are responding to the
threat. Big words and big gesture abound. Logic is sadly absent.
Sending a dozen or even a hundred battleships, aircraft carriers
and other big guns to patrol a span of sea that it would take them
months to sweep, looking for a few dozen speedboats close to one
of the world’s busiest shipping lanes seems the epitome of 4th
generation warfare. The again, cost effectiveness is not one
of the hallmarks of State action, even in a field, War, that is
traditionally
its prerogative. The image of a T-Rex chasing after egg-snatching
rodents springs to mind. Best case scenario, the pirates assume
the increased risk (as drug smugglers do) and become more adept
at avoiding and running from the naval forces. Worst case…well if
the thought of losing a hundred million dollar ship to the marine
equivalent of an IED does not keep fleet commanders awake at night…maybe
the prospect of a movie called "Sea
King Down"
might.
Any partial
solution to the piracy problem would entail raising the cost of
hijackings. Given the scant means in the pirates' armoury, the vulnerability
of their ships and their reliance on surprise attacks, this should
not be too difficult. Night vision equipment, keeping guard and
of course arming merchant ships would go a long way towards making
piracy a less appealing prospect.
Enlisting local
help to obtain early warning of where the pirates might strike next
is also key… the pirates are not the only ones with cell
phones in Somalia.
Finally, fast,
cheap, proportional response to the pirate threat might also come
from local sources, even from those insurance and shipping industries
most directly affected: Letters
of Marque and Reprisal could find their way back into the anti-piracy
arsenal.
However, given
a choice between disproportionate, expensive and ineffective response
or allowing non-state actors the right of self-defence, I have no
doubts which way governments of the world will prefer.
Of course any
real solution would involve peace in Somalia, something that the
US and other powers, intent on establishing a State in their own
image, make highly unlikely.
November
26, 2008
Félix Moreno
de la Cova Solís [send him mail]
studied law and economics at ICADE, works as an equity trader in
Madrid, and is a member of FOL.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
|