War:
Realities and Myths
By Chris Hedges
".
. . the lie, about war, about ourselves, is imploding our democracy."
The
vanquished know war. They see through the empty jingoism of those
who use the abstract words of glory, honor, and patriotism to mask
the cries of the wounded, the senseless killing, war profiteering,
and chest-pounding grief. They know the lies the victors often do
not acknowledge, the lies covered up in stately war memorials and
mythic war narratives, filled with words of courage and comradeship.
They know the lies that permeate the thick, self-important memoirs
by amoral statesmen who make wars but do not know war.
The
vanquished know the essence of war death. They grasp that
war is necrophilia. They see that war is a state of almost pure
sin with its goals of hatred and destruction. They know how war
fosters alienation, leads inevitably to nihilism, and is a turning
away from the sanctity and preservation of life. All other narratives
about war too easily fall prey to the allure and seductiveness of
violence, as well as the attraction of the godlike power that comes
with the license to kill with impunity.
But
the words of the vanquished come later, sometimes long after the
war, when grown men and women unpack the suffering they endured
as children, what it was like to see their mother or father killed
or taken away, or what it was like to lose their homes, their community,
their security, and be discarded as human refuse. But by then few
listen. The truth about war comes out, but usually too late. We
are assured by the war-makers that these stories have no bearing
on the glorious violent enterprise the nation is about to inaugurate.
And, lapping up the myth of war and its sense of empowerment, we
prefer not to look.
We
see the war in Iraq only through the distorted lens of the occupiers.
The embedded reporters, dependent on the military for food and transportation
as well as security, have a natural and understandable tendency,
one I have myself felt, to protect those who are protecting them.
They are not allowed to report outside of the unit and are, in effect,
captives. They have no relationships with the occupied, essential
to all balanced reporting of conflicts, but only with the Marines
and soldiers who drive through desolate mud-walled towns and pump
grenades and machine-gun bullets into houses, leaving scores of
nameless dead and wounded in their wake. The reporters admire and
laud these fighters for their physical courage. They feel protected
as well by the jet fighters and heavy artillery and throaty rattle
of machine guns. And the reporting, even among those who struggle
to keep some distance, usually descends into a shameful cheerleading.
There
is no more candor in Iraq or Afghanistan than there was in Vietnam,
but in the age of live satellite feeds the military has perfected
the appearance of candor. What we are fed is the myth of war. For
the myth of war, the myth of glory and honor sells newspapers and
boosts ratings, real war reporting does not. Ask the grieving parents
of Pat Tillman. Nearly every embedded war correspondent sees his
or her mission as sustaining civilian and army morale. This is what
passes for coverage on FOX, MSNBC or CNN. In wartime, as Senator
Hiram Johnson reminded us in 1917, "truth is the first casualty."
All
our knowledge of the war in Iraq has to be viewed as lacking the
sweep and depth that will come one day, perhaps years from now,
when a small Iraqi boy or girl reaches adulthood and unfolds for
us the sad and tragic story of the invasion and bloody occupation
of their nation.
I
have spent most of my adult life in war. I began two decades ago
covering wars in Central America, where I spent five years, then
the Middle East, where I spent seven, and the Balkans where I covered
the wars in Bosnia and Kosovo. My life has been marred, let me say
deformed, by the organized industrial violence that year after year
was an intimate part of my existence. I have watched young men bleed
to death on lonely Central American dirt roads and cobblestone squares
in Sarajevo. I have looked into the eyes of mothers, kneeing over
the lifeless and mutilated bodies of their children. I have stood
in warehouses with rows of corpses, including children, and breathed
death into my lungs. I carry within me the ghosts of those I worked
with, my comrades, now gone.
I
have felt the attraction of violence. I know its seductiveness,
excitement and the powerful addictive narcotic it can become. The
young soldiers, trained well enough to be disciplined but encouraged
to maintain their naïve adolescent belief in invulnerability, have
in wartime more power at their fingertips than they will ever have
again. They catapult from being minimum wage employees at places
like Burger King, facing a life of dead-end jobs with little hope
of health insurance and adequate benefits, to being part of, in
the words of the Marines, "the greatest fighting force on the face
of the earth." The disparity between what they were and what they
have become is breathtaking and intoxicating. This intoxication
is only heightened in wartime when all taboos are broken. Murder
goes unpunished and often rewarded. The thrill of destruction fills
their days with wild adrenaline highs, strange grotesque landscapes
that are hallucinogenic, all accompanied by a sense of purpose and
comradeship, overpowers the alienation many left behind. They become
accustomed to killing, carrying out acts of slaughter with no more
forethought than they take to relieve themselves. And the abuses
committed against the helpless prisoners in Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo
are not aberrations but the real face of war. In wartime all human
beings become objects, objects either to gratify or destroy or both.
And almost no one is immune. The contagion of the crowd sees to
that.
"Force,"
Simon Weil wrote, "is as pitiless to the man who possess it, or
thinks he does, as it is to his victim. The second it crushes; the
first it intoxicates."
This
myth, the lie, about war, about ourselves, is imploding our democracy.
We shun introspection and self-criticism. We ignore truth, to embrace
the strange, disquieting certitude and hubris offered by the radical
Christian Right. These radical Christians draw almost exclusively
from the book of Revelations, the only time in the Gospels where
Jesus sanctions violence, peddling a vision of Christ as the head
of a great and murderous army of heavenly avengers. They rarely
speak about Christ's message of love, forgiveness and compassion.
They relish the cataclysmic destruction that will befall unbelievers,
including those such as myself, who they dismiss as "nominal Christians."
They divide the world between good and evil, between those anointed
to act as agents of God and those who act as agents of Satan. The
cult of masculinity and esthetic of violence pervades their ideology.
Feminism and homosexuality are forces, believers are told, that
have rendered the American male physically and spiritually impotent.
Jesus, for the Christian Right, is a man of action, casting out
demons, battling the Anti-Christ, attacking hypocrites and castigating
the corrupt. The language is one not only of exclusion, hatred and
fear, but a call for apocalyptic violence, in short the language
of war.
As
the war grinds forward, as we sink into a morass of our own creation,
as our press and political opposition, and yes even our great research
universities, remain complacent and passive, as we refuse to confront
the forces that have crippled us outside our gates and are working
to cripple us within, the ideology of the Christian Right, so intertwined
with intolerance and force, will become the way we speak not only
to others but among ourselves.
In
war, we always deform ourselves, our essence. We give up individual
conscience – maybe even consciousness – for contagion of the crowd,
the rush of patriotism, the belief that we must stand together as
nation in moments of extremity. To make a moral choice, to defy
war's enticement, to find moral courage, can be self-destructive.
The
attacks on the World Trade Center illustrate that those who oppose
us, rather than coming from another moral universe, have been schooled
well in modern warfare. The dramatic explosions, the fireballs,
the victims plummeting to their deaths, the collapse of the towers
in Manhattan, were straight out of Hollywood. Where else, but from
the industrialized world, did the suicide bombers learn that huge
explosions and death above a city skyline are a peculiar and effective
form of communication? They have mastered the language we have taught
them. They understand that the use of indiscriminate violence against
innocents is a way to make a statement. We leave the same calling
cards. We delivered such incendiary messages in Vietnam, Serbia,
Afghanistan and Iraq. It was Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara
who in the summer of 1965 defined the bombing raids that would kill
hundreds of thousands of civilians north of Saigon as a means of
communication to the Communist regime in Hanoi.
The
most powerful anti-war testaments, of war and what war does to us,
are those that eschew images of combat. It is the suffering of the
veteran whose body and mind are changed forever because he or she
served a nation that sacrificed them, the suffering of families
and children caught up in the unforgiving maw of war, which begin
to tell the story of war. But we are not allowed to see dead bodies,
at least of our own soldiers, nor do we see the wounds that forever
mark a life, the wounds that leave faces and bodies horribly disfigured
by burns or shrapnel. We never watch the agony of the dying. War
is made palatable. It is sanitized. We are allowed to taste war's
perverse thrill, but spared from seeing war's consequences. The
wounded and the dead are swiftly carted offstage. And for this I
blame the press, which willingly hides from us the effects of bullets,
roadside bombs and rocket-propelled grenades, which sat at the feet
of those who lied to make this war possible and dutifully reported
these lies and called it journalism.
War
is always about this betrayal. It is about the betrayal of the young
by the old, idealists by cynics and finally soldiers by politicians.
Those who pay the price, those who are maimed forever by war, however,
are crumpled up and thrown away. We do not see them. We do not hear
them. They are doomed, like wandering spirits, to float around the
edges of our consciousness, ignored, even reviled. The message they
bring is too painful for us to hear. We prefer the myth of war,
the myth of glory, honor, patriotism and heroism, words that in
the terror and brutality of combat are empty, meaningless and obscene.
We
are losing the war in Iraq. We are an isolated and reviled nation.
We are pitiless to others weaker than ourselves. We have lost sight
of our democratic ideals. Thucydides wrote of Athens expanding empire
and how this empire led it to become a tyrant abroad and then a
tyrant at home. The tyranny Athens imposed on others it finally
imposed on itself. If we do not confront the lies and hubris told
to justify the killing and mask the destruction carried out in our
name in Iraq, if we do not grasp the moral corrosiveness of empire
and occupation, if we continue to allow force and violence to be
our primary form of communication, if we do not remove from power
our flag-waving, cross-bearing versions of the Taliban, we will
not so much defeat dictators such as Saddam Hussein as become them.
June
11, 2005
Chris
Hedges has been a war reporter for 15 years most recently for the
New York Times. He is author of What
Every Person Should Know About War a book that offers a critical
lesson in the dangerous realities of war. He's also author of War
is a Force that Gives Us Meaning.
Copyright
© 2005 Chris Hedges
|