Second
Amendment Rights Once Again at Risk
by
Raven Clabough
New
American
Americans continue
to watch their Second Amendment rights diminish, this time as the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives ( still known
as ATF) launches a campaign to change the definition of “shotgun.”
According to the blog Beregond’s Bar, a recently released
study
by the Bureau will ultimately make shotguns illegal, and may
also have negative implications for all guns.
The ATF states
that the purpose of the study is to “establish criteria that the Bureau
of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives will use to determine
the importability of certain shotguns under the provisions of the
Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) …[which] generally [prohibit] the importation
of firearms into the United States.”
The study focuses
specifically on the sporting purposes of shotguns, just as the ATF
1998 survey provided guidelines for determining the sporting purposes
of rifles.
Beregond’s
Bar notes,
“Sporting is one of the three main thrusts of gun control efforts
in America. The other two are racism and those who openly advocate
complete bans except for military and police.”
Providing background
on how sporting criteria is often utilized to advance gun control,
Beregond’s Bar explains:
Sporting use
was how the original distinction was made about what weapons would
be subject to a special tax in the National
Firearms Act (NFA) in 1934, and again in Title II of the Gun
Control Act of 1968. The congressional power to tax was used
selectively to make ownership of weapons the government didn’t like
burdensome and expensive. This was gun control via the back door,
as even
the ATF admits. As would become the pattern, politicians found
that actually dealing with crime and criminals was difficult and
expensive. Blaming guns and passing a law to look like they were
doing something about it was much simpler.
Declaring that
activities that were “generally recognized” as legitimate “sporting
purposes in previous studies are not necessarily the same as those
activities that are generally recognized as sporting purposes in
the modern era,” the study outlines a number of features of shotguns
wherein “sporting use” cannot apply, many of which are common in
hunting and self-defense:
- Folding,
telescoping, or collapsible stocks;
- bayonet
lugs;
- flash suppressors;
- magazines
over 5 rounds, or a drum magazine;
- grenade-launcher
mounts;
- integrated
rail systems (other than on top of the receiver or barrel);
- light enhancing
devices;
- excessive
weight (greater than 10 pounds for 12 gauge or smaller);
- excessive
bulk (greater than 3 inches in width and/or greater than 4 inches
in depth);
- forward
pistol grips or other protruding parts designed or used for gripping
the shotgun with the shooter’s extended hand.
The study concludes
that there should be a “limited exception to the general prohibition
on the importation of firearms without placing any undue or unnecessary
Federal restrictions of burdens on law-abiding citizens with respect
to the acquisition, possession, or use of firearms.” Though the
ATF contends that its determinations will have no impact on “true
sporting shotguns,” it admits that they will “certainly prevent
the importation of certain shotguns.”
The study also
recommends that “sporting determinations for shotguns not specifically
addressed by this study be reviewed by a panel pursuant to ATF orders,
policies and procedures, as appropriate.”
Read
the rest of the article
April
20, 2011
Copyright
© 2011 The New American
|