'The Worst Economic Downturn In 60 Years'
by
Gary North
by Gary North
DIGG THIS
So said the
Chancellor of the Exchequer, the senior economic official in Great
Britain. The story ran on August 30.
Britain
is facing "arguably the worst" economic downturn in 60 years which
will be "more profound and long-lasting" than people had expected,
Alistair
Darling, the chancellor, tells the Guardian today.
In the government's
gravest assessment of the economy, which follows a warning from
a Bank of England policymaker that 2 million people could be out
of work by Christmas, Darling admits he had no idea how serious
the credit crunch would become.
It was later
reported by another source that the
interview had taken place two weeks earlier.
This means
that the economy by mid-August had convinced the Chancellor to give
the interview.
I recall no
negative economic statement this forthright by any incumbent senior
politician in my lifetime. This simply is not done.
The response
to this article was a fall in the British pound on Monday, September
1. The decline continued all week.
The bad economic
news arrived at his office rather late. The British public has been
well aware of this for months. On June 30, the London Times
ran this headline: "Families'
cash fears worst for 26 years."
The
monthly poll of consumer sentiment found that householders' confidence
about future economic prospects had sunk to its lowest level since
1982. Confidence in existing economic conditions dropped during
June to levels not seen since late 1992, at the end of the last
recession.
Additional evidence
of negative sentiment was concern over unemployment.
A
new survey from Lloyds TSB also shows that people are more worried
about losing their job than at any point in the past three years,
as employers feel the effects of the downturn and may have to lay
off staff.
When a nation's
workers are fearful about their jobs, they become fearful about the
economy in general. Confidence is crucial to the maintenance of prevailing
spending patterns. Confidence is falling.
The
GfK NOP poll based on people's views on their own finances
as well as wider economic conditions found that the overall
confidence index sank by five points this month to a reading of
minus 34, on a par with the lowest level since the poll began in
1974. The record low of minus 35 was reached in March 1990, immediately
before the start of the last recession.
When sentiment
turns down nationally, the economy is threatened by the unwillingness
of consumers to keep spending on anything except necessities. This
creates a crisis for retailers who depend on feel-good spending.
Willingness
to make "big ticket" purchases has also fallen to a record low.
Figures published last week showed that families suffered the steepest
decline in disposable incomes for nearly a decade during the first
three months of the year.
Great Britain
is facing what the United States is facing, along with Ireland, Australia,
and Canada: a falling housing sector.
House-price
falls are accelerating as potential buyers retreat from the market
in expectation of cheaper property values in future. The number
of homes changing hands last month fell to its lowest in 30 years,
according to the property website Hometrack. The average house price
dropped by another 1 per cent in June, twice as fast as in May.
Recent figures
indicate that home prices in July were down 10% over July, 2007,
the month before the international credit crunch began.
The
biggest drag on the British economy is the housing market where
mortgage approvals are down by more than 70 percent compared to
just one year ago. Given the difficult market, Prime Minister Gordon
Brown's government is eliminating the home-buyer tax known
as the stamp duty on residential home purchases of less than
$312,000. That rate would affect just less than half of all homes
on the market in Britain.
"We've got a credit
crunch, the like of which we have not seen in generations," Darling
told the BBC.
We are in
an international economic slowdown. The Organization for Economic
Cooperation, a mainstream international organization, has
been unusually frank. It has predicted economic contraction
for Great Britain for the next two quarters. It has said that Germany,
Italy, and France will barely grow.
"We
are facing difficult times, you know we are in a situation where
you have the combination of the credit crunch together with high
oil and food prices and we have not seen that coming together. It
is unique, which the IMF itself has said we have not seen this since
the 1930s in fact," said Darling.
Here is what
is remarkable about Darling's statements. As recently as April,
he shrugged off all such talk. The
Times reported this on April 10.
Alistair
Darling moved to calm fears about a house price crash yesterday
and stood by his predictions for economic growth despite a gloomy
forecast from the International Monetary Fund.
The Chancellor
told the Radio 4 programme Today that there were still "grounds
for optimism" in the face of an "unprecedented shock to the economy".
He said that there would "obviously" be a slowdown but stuck to
his Budget projection that the economy would grow by between 1.75
and 2.25 per cent this year and between 2.25 and 2.75 per cent
in 2009. . . .
Mr Darling
said that Britain had a "strong economy that had proved remarkably
resilient" in the slowdown. He said that the IMF had downgraded
Britain by less than other big economies. He also insisted that
Britain was better placed than other countries to cope with the
downturn.
The downturn
has proven to be relentless. The figures reveal that Great Britain
is moving rapidly into a recession. Finally, Darling decided to
come clean. He admitted publicly what the British public has known
for months.
I would like
to say something like this: "When a senior politician finally admits
that there is an economic crisis, the crisis is large." But there
are no precedents for such an announcement.
AN INTERNATIONAL
CRISIS
The economic
slowdown that has engulfed the United States is not limited to the
United States. The expansion of fiat money under Alan Greenspan,
beginning in the summer of 2000, and continuing until his retirement
at the end of January, 2006, was sufficient to expand the international
economy.
Greenspan's
policies created a massive international real estate bubble. He
did this with the cooperation of other central banks. These central
banks purchased the IOUs of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac on the assumption
that the United States government stood behind this debt. No such
legal guarantee was ever made for either organization. But central
bankers believed that the United States government would intervene
in the case of a breakdown of these private organizations. As yet,
this has not happened, but it is clear that it is going to happen
if the two organizations go bankrupt.
With the expansion
of fiat money and the reduction of interest rates around the world,
the world has indulged in fantasy. Investors have bought houses
on the assumption that there would be enormous on-paper profits,
year after year, for holding residential real estate. Tens of millions
of families have moved into houses that they can just barely afford
to pay for. They assumed that this investment decision would enable
them to live in much nicer housing and also provide capital gains.
In other words, they believed in the tooth fairy. They believed
they could live in their gingerbread houses and get rich with them,
too. It was going to be a win-win deal. It has now become a lose-lose
deal. Investors have lost fortunes, and they are going to lose far
more money. The solvency of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae has been
called into question on the Web and on the stock market. Their share
prices have collapsed. So have the share prices of the banks that
financed the building boom.
We are now
seeing the entire Western world facing a recession. China and Asia
have not yet hit the brick wall, but their stock markets are down
by over 50% over the last year. This indicates that the days of
wine and roses are over for Asia, too.
China's central
bank has inflated the currency consistently by close to 20% per
annum for years. This is now catching up with the nation. Prices
are rising; bottlenecks are appearing; and businesses are going
bankrupt that had relied on cheap labor. The Austrian theory of
the trade cycle still is alive and well in Asia. When Asian central
banks begin to cut back on the expansion of their currencies, the
recession will hit them the way that it has hit the West.
The fact that
the Chancellor of the Exchequer would go public with his assessment
of the economy indicates that the incumbent politicians have been
covering up the real situation all year. Darling went public because
no other incumbent politician was willing to do so. The British
public is well aware of the situation. Voters in Great Britain have
been voting Labour politicians out of office. Labour has been the
incumbent party, and Labour will now pay politically. The same situation
is facing the Republican Party in the United States. There is no
escape from reality of this economic crisis. Incumbent politicians
are saying as little as possible, but the reality of the economy
cannot be hidden indefinitely.
THE
MAINSTREAM FINANCIAL MEDIA
The mainstream
financial media in 2008 finally caught up with what obscure financial
newsletters such as mine warned about in 2005, and which began to
appear in 2006. The financial markets have learned the reality of
fiat money's effects, as explained by the Austrian theory of the
trade cycle, beginning in August of 2007. It has taken over a year
for the inescapable reality of the Austrian theory the trade cycle
to become apparent to the mainstream media. Now, it has actually
caught the attention of a senior government official. I do not expect
this candor to spread to other incumbent politicians.
I especially
don't think this will happen in the United States between now and
the general election in November. The Democrats will do their best
to blame the Bush Administration for the crisis. The Bush Administration
deserves plenty of blame, but the real culprit has been Alan Greenspan.
He always had bipartisan support, and no one even today is willing
to call a spade a spade in the mainstream media. It was Federal
Reserve policy more than it was Bush's deficits that led to the
present crisis. Bush's deficits have exacerbated the situation,
but the public really does not care about government deficits or
any other deficits. When politicians come up with tax cuts for the
middle class, most voters approve. Democrat politicians vote for
the tax cuts, if the tax cuts are for the middle class. The deficits
continue.
So far, the
Federal government has contented itself with pontificating about
the need for public action. It has done almost nothing. This is
good. Whatever it does is going to cost taxpayers dearly. But it
is likely that as the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac crisis accelerates,
and housing continues downward over the next year, the government
is going to intervene in the housing market. It is going to nationalize
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. It is going to do so in the name of
the voters, but in fact it will do so because the central bank of
China holds at least $350 billion in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
debt. This will be a bailout of the biggest banks in the world:
central banks.
Anyone who
says that the worst is behind us has got to show that he never said
it before, and that the evidence clearly indicates that the new
engine of economic growth has begun to accelerate. There is no identifiable
engine of growth today. There is no large segment of the American
economy, the British economy, the European economy, or the Asian
economy that indicates that there has been a turnaround, and that
the engines are sufficiently large to pull the stagnating national
trains.
At this point,
investors had better pay close attention to the logic and evidence
of every argument, if there is an argument, presented by somebody
who says that the worst is behind us. He has to show that the consumer
has become optimistic again. He also has to show that the consumer
can continue to spend as much as he has spent over the last six
years, despite the fact that his home's equity is declining and
may actually be negative. He has to show that the consumer can tap
into low-interest loans that will enable him to expand his consumption
without increasing his monthly economic payments on debt, which
is the crucial limiting factor on whether or not the consumer will
go into further debt. The old statement, follow the money, applies
equally well when there is no new money to follow.
CONCLUSION
The
international economy will continue downward for the rest of 2008.
The housing markets in Western Europe and North America will continue
downward for at least two years, and possibly as long as five years.
The end of the illusion regarding living in your own ever-expanding
ATM is here.
We now await
the re-inflation of the money supply by Western central banks. Even
then, I don't think it will be enough to reignite the housing markets.
The bloom is off the rose. Only the thorns remain.
September
6, 2008
Gary
North [send him mail] is the
author of Mises
on Money. Visit http://www.garynorth.com.
He is also the author of a free 20-volume series, An
Economic Commentary on the Bible.
Copyright ©
2008 LewRockwell.com
Gary
North Archives
|