Lincoln
and FDR
by
Gary North
In response to a recent question regarding why Abraham Lincoln
and Franklin Delano Roosevelt seem to be politically sacrosanct,
I offer the following suggestions.
-
Rhetoric.
Each man was a master of rhetoric. Lincoln was America’s
consummate master of the written political word, in an era
when the newspaper had become the key mass media technology.
FDR was a master of the spoken political word, beginning
in the first full decade in which radio was universal. FDR
was matched by Churchill and Hitler, two other early rhetorical
masters of radio.
-
Victorious
wars. Both Presidents oversaw huge wars that were successfully
prosecuted on the battlefield. Churchill had the same post-war
battlefield advantage, and he therefore looms large in the
textbooks. Victors write the history textbooks. The magnitude
of the loss of life and the gigantic economic cost made post-war
revisionism difficult to sell to the American public. The
public was not psychologically prepared to consider any suggestion
that these deaths and costs had been avoidable and therefore
in vain. The American public was not told that both men had
lured the respective enemy nations into firing the first shot:
Lincoln by dispatching a warship to Charleston harbor, and
FDR by imposing a peacetime economic embargo theft
from American exporters on Japan.
-
Well-timed
deaths. Lincoln became a martyr, thereby escaping responsibility
for the victor’s justice imposed by the Radical Republicans
and the military in the South: Reconstruction. FDR died shortly
before Hitler committed suicide, and he thereby escaped responsibility
for dropping the two atomic bombs. Woodrow Wilson did not
die soon enough after World War I, and his reputation suffered,
as did his party at the polls in the next election. The same
was true of Churchill.
-
Politics.
Lincoln was the first President elected by his political party.
FDR was the first President to be elected for four terms,
solidifying his party’s control to such an extent that the
Republicans have simultaneously captured both houses of Congress
and the Presidency only twice: 1953-55 and today (which will
be lost when Strom Thurmond dies). Their political heirs do
whatever is necessary to preserve the reputations of these
crucial Presidents.
-
Statism.
These two were the greatest centralizers of political power
in the history of the Presidency. The reigning academic class
is generally statist, having been funded by the State. (State-funded
propaganda is one of the few products that often seems to
stand the test of time. The money actually produces the unofficially
intended results.) These people write American history for
the masses.
February
22, 2001
Gary North is the author of an eleven-volume series, An Economic
Commentary on the Bible. The latest volume is Cooperation
and Dominion: An Economic Commentary on Romans. The series can
be downloaded free of charge at www.freebooks.com.
©
2001 LewRockwell.com
Gary
North Archives
|