An
Open Letter to Gary Becker re: Depressions
by
Bob Murphy
by Bob Murphy
DIGG THIS
Dear
Professor Becker:
I was pleasantly
surprised to see you seriously entertain the notion that "depressions" for
younger readers, the term economists used to use for what we now
call "recessions" might serve a socially useful function.
This is a crucial issue, as the government has already committed
more than one trillion dollars, and assumed incredible powers, in
an attempt to skirt the current slump. Virtually every financial
commentator takes it for granted that boom periods are good while
recessions are bad, and that government policies ought to foster
booms while minimizing recessionary periods.
The Austrian
School of economics rejects government intervention in economic
events altogether. As we will explain below, the Austrians do not
accept the standard view held even by famous proponents of
the free market, such as Milton Friedman that the business
cycle is a normal feature of capitalism. On the contrary, Ludwig
von Mises and subsequent Austrians developed the theory that the
business cycle is an unintended consequence of government intervention
in the monetary and banking system. Specifically, the central bank
(the Federal Reserve in the United States) pushes the interest rate
down below its "natural" level by injecting new money
into the banking system. This artificial stimulus sets in motion
an unsustainable boom period of illusory prosperity.
During the
subsequent (and inevitable) recession, resources are reallocated
in light of the "malinvestments" made during the boom.
Far from being "bad," the recession is part of the process
of recovery, where entrepreneurs make the best of the untenable
situation created during the boom. It is in this sense that Austrians
say that recessions are a good thing. They are the recognition of
the previous mistakes that entrepreneurs have made investing scarce
resources, when they were misled by the distorted price signals
reverberating from the Fed's interventions.
If the Austrians
are right in their diagnosis of the boom-bust cycle, then the typical
policy prescriptions offered by most economists are harmful. These
"countercyclical" measures try to prevent the recession
from unfolding, by stamping down on unemployment and propping up
insolvent businesses. Yet these actions simply prolong the agony,
and ensure that even more resources are squandered while the economy
tries to adjust to a sustainable configuration. To adopt a biological
metaphor: Of course nobody likes vomiting. But if someone has ingested
poison, throwing it up is a good thing. Efforts by physicians to
numb the person's gag reflex and settle his stomach will lead to
disaster.
Read
the rest of the article
November 25, 2008
Bob
Murphy [send him mail]
runs the blog Free
Advice and is the author of The
Politically Incorrect Guide to Capitalism.
Bob
Murphy Archives
Copyright
© 2008 Ludwig von Mises Institute
|