Pundits
and self-appointed experts on Islam are wringing their hands
as they try to explain why two Muslim doctors and at least six
other medical workers were involved in this week’s failed bombings
in London and Glasgow.
It certainly
sounds horrific and counter-intuitive. Physicians, trained to
heal, turned into would-be mass murders with cars packed full
of explosive materials and nails. Since I’m writing a book on
why the Muslim world is so angry at the west, let me venture
some heretical thoughts.
First,
there is nothing sacrosanct about doctors. Behind carefully
cultivated veneers of icy detachment, they have the same emotions
as ordinary mortals.
The most
evil, frightening man I ever met – and I’ve met a lot – was
Haiti’s tyrant, "Papa Doc" Duvalier, who was a crusading
country doctor before he turned into a Voodoo-crazed despot.
Second,
the amateur, would-be killers who staged these bungled attacks
were not, as many western pundits claim, unlikely to have been
driven by some sort of homicidal perversion native to Islam.
An entire cottage industry of publicity-seeking anti-Muslim
writers is at work seeking to confirm the increasingly popular
prejudice that Islam is a sick, demented, homicidal faith. These
pundits are merely licking the hand that pays them.
There is
nothing in Islam that advocates homicidal acts or mass killing.
In fact, while it’s popular these days to demonize Islam as
a violent faith, we should recall that history’s biggest mass
murderers, Stalin, Genghis Khan, Mao, and Hitler, were not Muslims.
Auschwitz and the gulag did not come from Islam. World wars
I and II, the most murderous in history, were begun by Christian
nations and Japan.
The two
accused doctors now under arrest in Britain, one of whom was
Iraqi and the other Jordanian of Palestinian descent, were most
likely driven by rage over the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,
pure and simple.
Nothing
ever excuses killing civilians. Those who stage horrific bombings
against Israelis, Europeans, Americans, and fellow Muslim civilians
are criminals. Nothing excuses their behavior. But we must understand
why it happens and why it will continue. Understanding has nothing
to do with condoning.
Britain’s
new prime minister, Gordon Brown, responded the right way to
the London and Glasgow incidents. Unlike Tony Blair, who raised
anti-western attacks to hysterical, apocalyptic levels, declaring
civilization in peril, the dour Brown properly characterized
the latest outrages as "criminal" acts to be handled
by the police.
The two
doctors who tried to kill British civilians were most likely
motivated by the same ferocious fury as the suicide squads who
attacked New York and Washington on 11 Sept 2001.
Their attacks
were not the result of some innate sickness in Islam, misreading
the Koran, brainwashing, or hatred of western shopping habits.
Our governments and media just refuse to face the ugly reality
that such attacks are very often a direct reaction to our own
violent actions in the Mideast and South Asia.
We can’t
expect to go on bombing and shooting up Iraq, or shredding Afghan
villages with cluster bombs and 20mm Gatling guns, and not expect
violent reaction. The increasing death of civilians in Iraq
and Afghanistan, and the ongoing agonies of Palestine, have
enraged the Muslim World against the west.
Most Muslims
simply complain. But a tiny number, as in Britain, forget rationality,
humanity, or common sense and try to strike back at what they
believe are the oppressors of the Muslin world.
I was in
London two years ago this past weekend when a group of British
Muslims bombed the London Underground and a bus. Their motivation,
it was subsequently revealed, was revenge against Britain for
its invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.
Such violence
is criminal and, worse, to paraphrase Tallyrand, a mistake.
They undermine whatever cause the militants are fighting for,
making them into criminals with no possible justifiable grievances.
In the end, innocent Muslims in Britain and other western nations
become victims of these mindless attacks.
But revenge
attacks will continue, and even intensify, until the west reassesses
its policies in the regions that are generating such anti-western
violence.
Intensified
police work is needed at home to prevent more attacks. Muslim
leaders must keep telling their people that attacks against
civilians are immoral and self-defeating.
But western
governments have to face the fact that the wars they are waging
against the Muslim world are the primary generators of terrorism.
In the intelligence business, it’s called blowback.
Blaming
every violent incident on the shadowy al-Qaida is a handy excuse
for avoiding reality and responsibility. But it won’t change
the fact that a good 20% of the world’s population is increasingly
enraged at the US, Britain, Australia, and, most lately, Canada.
How can we hector the Muslim world to cease its acts of violence
when we westerners continue to intensify our own?