|
Who Will
Miss Zarqawi?
The only people who may miss al-Zarqawi are the pro-war
neocons, who claimed he was part of al-Qaida to justify the invasion of Iraq
by
Eric Margolis
by Eric Margolis
"Zarqawi
will be dead soon," two of his disgruntled Jordanian supporters
told me in March. "He will be betrayed by his own men."
And that's
likely what happened last week. Tipped off that Iraq's most wanted
man was in a rural house, U.S. aircraft bombed it, killing some
of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's top aides, a woman and a child. Who will
collect the $25-million bounty offered by the U.S. remains to be
seen.
Zarqawi, the
poster boy of so-called Islamic terrorism, was born in Zarqa, a
Jordanian of Palestinian refugee parents. He came closest to fitting
the term "terrorist" of anyone since the late, unlamented
mass killer, Abu Nidal.
Both were vicious
mad dogs who revelled in mass violence and cruel executions. They
quickly forgot political goals and devoted themselves to wanton,
often aimless bloodshed.
Few will miss
Zarqawi. But his assassination is not "a major victory against
al-Qaida," as U.S. President George Bush claimed.
Contrary to
erroneous reports in the western media, Zarqawi's so-called "al-Qaida
in Iraq" was not truly part of Osama bin Laden's movement.
After the U.S.
invaded Iraq, Zarqawi, who had been a member of an anti-Saddam militant
group, set up his own small radical group. In a clever ploy to achieve
instant notoriety, Zarqawi proclaimed it "al-Qaida in Iraq."
The real al-Qaida
was most displeased by Zarqawi's brazen trademark infringement.
This deception was enhanced by faked letters "intercepted"
by U.S. forces claiming to show Zarqawi was acting under bin Laden's
direct orders.
Along with
his deputy, Dr. Ayman Zawahiri, bin Laden strongly opposed Zarqawi's
bloody attacks on Muslim civilians, his decapitations of hostages
as "un-Islamic."
Iraq's 20-odd
resistance groups battling U.S.-British occupation also strongly
denounced Zarqawi's murderous car and truck bombing rampages aimed
at igniting a civil war between Sunnis, Shias and Kurds.
Numerous Iraqi
resistance leaders and some Arab media even claimed Zarqawi and
his henchmen were covert "agents provocateurs" working
for the U.S. and Britain to stir up ethnic tensions as part of Britain's
old "divide and rule" techniques.
Double agents
This sounded
far-fetched until the arrest in Basra of British SAS commandos armed
with explosives and disguised as Arabs, leading many to believe
Zarqawi's men were western double agents.
Assuming Zarqawi
is well and truly dead, what now? First, he will be unmourned. Zarqawi
was universally hated and feared.
Ironically,
the only people who may miss him are the Bush administration's pro-war
neocons, who claimed Zarqawi was part of al-Qaida, and thus justified
the U.S. invasion of Iraq as a key part of the so-called "war
on terrorism."
Zarqawi and
his men spent most of their time killing Iraqi civilians. The majority
of attacks on U.S. occupation forces in Iraq are conducted by former
members of Saddam's military, Baath Party, and other small underground
nationalist groups like Nasserites and anti-Saddam nationalists.
So Zarwaqi's
death may mean fewer murderous attacks on civilians, but is unlikely
to take the heat off U.S.-British occupation forces. In fact, his
death might even promote better Sunni-Shia relations, allowing for
the emergence of a more independent-minded Iraqi government that
could increasingly reject Washington's near-total "guidance."
Fragmented
resistance
The first small
but significant hints of such independence emerged last week as
the new Baghdad government openly complained about the slaughter
of Iraqi civilians by U.S. troops.
The
Iraqi resistance is fragmented into more than a score of shadowy
groups. No single leader has yet emerged. Now that Zarqawi appears
gone, the U.S. will need to find another demonic figure with which
to keep selling the war to Americans at home, 75% of whom still
amazingly believe Saddam Hussein launched the 9/11 attacks.
Assassinating
Zarqawi will give Bush a short-lived bump in the polls. But in the
longer run, killing him was maybe not such a great idea. For the
U.S., Zarqawi was far more useful alive. Iraqis, however, will be
universally better off.
June
13, 2006
Eric
Margolis [send
him mail], contributing foreign editor for Sun National Media
Canada, is the author of War
at the Top of the World. See his
website.
Copyright
© 2006 Eric Margolis
Eric
Margolis Archives
|