The Founding Fathers Were Commies!
by
Manuel Lora
by Manuel Lora
DIGG THIS
"Is life
so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of
chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course
others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!"
~
A famous troublemaker
I made you
look with that title, didn't I? Seriously, though, it's time for
liberty lovers to take a step back and re-think a few things about
these 18th century aristocrats.
The reason
why libertarians cling to folks like Washington, Madison and Jefferson
is because of their views about liberty and how the government is
the opposite of liberty. Hey, I share that view as well. My beef
with them is not their theories so much as their actions. Let's
suppose that for a long and uncomfortable time a group of thugs
called The Faraway Mafia controlled many aspects of our neighborhood.
This persnickety group of busybodies had been imposing all kinds
of taxes and a growing number of regulations. Having had enough,
our local militia decides to take action and ends up kicking the
Faraway Mafia out of our homes and lands. Liberty has arrived! Or
has it?
Imagine that
the very same "heroes" who opposed the Faraway Mafia had conspired
all along to create the Domestic Mafia. They believed that evil
(oh, just a little bit of evil, the kind you can chain down with
ink on parchments) was necessary to keep each other from...being
evil. And they did just that. A central state they did create, and
with great alacrity. The founders, in their infinite wisdom, imported
tyranny and planted the seed of totalitarianism. Forgive me if I
am unable to understand how this is libertarian, much less worthy
of praise or yearly pyrotechnic rituals.
Let's take
a brief look at the historical setting. The several states had banded
together under a loose (and thus relatively free) union under the
Articles of
Confederation. When a convention was called in 1787, it was
to propose amendments to the Articles. It turns out that the framers
had other plans. Instead of changing the Articles, they conspired
against them. In what really should be called a coup, the founders
dumped the pretty libertarian AoC and wrote the Constitution,
exceeding the mandate from the state legislatures. The founders
should have left the old institutions of the monarchy wither away.
But no! As Hoppe notes in Democracy,
the God that Failed (p. 272), each of the independent states
already had taxing and legislative powers. Why on Earth, then, would
there be a need for another state, one to rule the rest heavy-handedly?
From there
being a tiny, almost nonexistent compact between the colonies under
the Articles of Confederation, the so-called defenders of liberty
established a greater government. Why would anyone do such a thing?
And further, why would we support them? Granted, the point can be
made that if liberty-friendly theoreticians had not been involved
in the inexorable creation of the new government, that other, perhaps
more tyrannical thinkers would have taken their place. But so what?
There is still no right to create a government, no matter what you
think. Though I would prefer a state that taxes me 1% instead of
35%, the point is that taxation itself is theft. The amount and
kind of taxation does not change its nature. Theft is theft. Thus,
anyone, then and now, who supports the Declaration of Independence
but also supported the Constitution (or, by Zeus, signed it), has
blood on his hands.
It's as if
Henry David Thoreau, a hardcore
anarchist, ran for Congress and called for higher taxes. Or
if Lysander Spooner, another champion of freedom, had wanted to
ban
smoking. To earn respect one need not be perfect of course,
for such a thing is not humanly possible. Yet if one is truly committed
to liberty, it is completely inexcusable to then turn your back
on it and become part of the state. That this was symptomatic of
those we called the founding fathers is good enough a reason to
believe that they were part of the problem.
The
conclusion is simple: Georgy "This River Is Cold!" Washington, Tommy
"Self-evident" Jefferson, Benny "Watch Me Fly Kites" Franklin, and
the rest of the clan are not heroes of liberty. History has given
them a free pass. Libertarians must stop revering these men immediately.
So, OK, fine
– the founding fathers were not really commies after all.
A republican form of government is what they aimed for.
But they were
still pinkos.
September
10, 2007
Manuel
Lora [send him mail]
works at Cornell University as a TV and multimedia producer. Visit
his blog.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Manuel
Lora Archives
|