Rundschau
by
William
S. Lind
by William S. Lind
If
we look around the world at the prospects for Fourth Generation
entities, what does the new year reveal? Regrettably, they seem
to face a rosy future.
The
Israeli assault on Hamas in Gaza will succeed physically, prove
a mixed bag mentally and fail on the moral level of war. Hamas is
militarily a pushover compared to Hezbollah, which makes the David
vs. Goliath nature of the conflict all the more evident. The stronger
the contrast, the worse the outcome for Goliath. The fact that the
timing if not the event is driven by Israeli electoral politics
makes the moral picture even grimmer. Add in that absent a deal
Hamas’s rocket fire will continue and we see the makings of a debacle
for Israel.
Some may
see the assault as Israel selecting the "Hama option"
van Creveld discusses, but I do not agree. Choosing the Hama option
would mean subjecting Gaza to a World War I–style bombardment,
with tens of thousands of Palestinians killed and the rest fleeing
into Egypt for their lives. Gaza would largely be flattened, as
was the Syrian city of Hama. As usual, the reality here is that
the state has fallen between the two stools of the Hama option and
de-escalation, which guarantees failure.
When
the dust settles, I expect Hamas to emerge bloodied but stronger.
It will continue to control Gaza, its support on the West Bank will
soar (right before elections there) and the Palestinian Authority
will look more like a stooge than ever. Strategically, the most
important result will be further weakening of the legitimacy of
the Egyptian government, which is bad news for America’s interests
in the region.
On
another front, the seeming quiet between India and Pakistan is deceptive.
I expect an out-of-the-blue strike by India on 4GW training camps
in Pakistan, a Pakistani defeat and possibly a collapse of the Pakistani
government in consequence. How many collapses of governments Pakistan
can endure before the state itself crumbles is a key strategic question.
The answer, I suspect, is not many more. Pakistan could offer Islamic
4GW forces an earth-shaking victory in 2009.
In
Afghanistan, the war continues to go badly for NATO and the U.S.
More American troops doing what they are doing now will make the
situation worse. The U.S. Army seems incapable of transferring what
it learned in Iraq to Afghanistan. It is attacking the population
rather than protecting it, which guarantees failure. The one bit
of good news is that the Taliban and al Qaeda are replicating the
latter’s mistakes in Iraq.
The advent
of the new American President changes nothing, because in Washington
nothing really changes. One wing of the Establishment leaves government
and goes into the think tanks and lobbying firms, another returns
from those same places to government. The Obama crowd will not face
up to the problem of America’s over-extension. It is just as globalist,
interventionist and imprudent as Bush’s herd of Gadarine swine.
Gates may prove the one exception, but in the land of the blind
the one-eyed man is hated. Plan on more mad foreign military adventures,
despite the fact that we now have to print the money to pay for
them. 4GW opponents will end up winning most.
Perhaps
the brightest sign on the horizon for 4GW entities of all types, not
just those that represent Islamic jihad, is the world economy. If
the world recession becomes a world depression, which looks more and
more likely, states everywhere will be weakened. For reasons Martin
van Creveld lays out in The
Rise and Decline of the State, citizens now expect their state
to take care of them economically. If they have no jobs and face penury,
they will be ready if not eager to transfer their primary allegiance
from the state to something else. A big winner here will be gangs
of every sort.
This
bleak Rundschau should not surprise us. We live in a time
toward the end of the world of states. A growing number of states
will vanish. Still more will become hollow shells, within which
4GW entities thrive while protected by "state sovereignty."
As Globalism collapses economically and the global elites are revealed
as emperors without clothes, the motto of every state will become
"sauve qui peut."
If
you’re lucky enough to have a time machine, set it to "Back"
and get aboard.
January
7, 2009
William
Lind, expressing his own personal opinion, is Director for the
Center
for Cultural Conservatism for the Free
Congress Foundation.
Copyright
© 2009 William S. Lind
William
Lind Archives
|