George,
Stay Out of Georgia
by
William S. Lind
DIGG THIS
What interests
does the United States have at stake in the war between Russia and
Georgia? Only one: that we remain out of it.
It almost passes
belief to think that the Bush administration, bogged down in two
wars and planning a third (with Iran), might move toward a confrontation
with Russia. Yet that is what the White House appears to be doing.
The August 11 Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that
President
Bush called the violence unacceptable and Vice President Dick
Cheney…said Russia’s actions in Georgia "must not go unanswered"…
Asked to
explain Cheney’s comment, White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe
said, "It means it must not stand."
That phrase
should send cold chills down the back of every American. It precisely
echoes President George H.W. Bush’s statement in response to Iraq’s
invasion of Kuwait, a statement that led to war. The White House
cannot be unaware of the parallel, which means it is threatening
war with Russia.
Have these
people gone utterly mad? It is doubtful we should risk nuclear war
for Alabama, much less Georgia.
A few facts
are in order here. First, the current conflict was started not by
Russia but by Georgia, which foolishly attacked the Russian dependency
of South Ossetia. Did Georgia make this suicidal move with prior
assurance of American backing? If so, Washington provoked the conflict,
which would be as great a crime as the Bush administration lying
us into war with Iraq.
Second,
Georgia clearly lies inside Russia’s sphere of influence and as
far outside America’s as it is possible to get.
Third,
there is nothing America can do to defend Georgia except threaten
nuclear war. We could send in a small "tripwire" force
of a battalion or two – God help us if we do and dare the Russians
to attack it. But if they called the bluff – and I think they would
– what then? It is impossible for the United States to wage conventional
war with Russia in her own backyard. We would have to go nuclear,
or back down and accept defeat. It is all too easy to guess which
alternative the Bush administration would select.
President
Bush has used Georgia to taunt and humiliate Russia, even putting
Georgia up for NATO membership, which the Europeans were wise enough
to block. This folly was part of a larger strategic blunder, going
back to the Clinton administration, of treating Russia as an opponent
despite the fall of Communism.
That blunder
is now blowing up in our face, as Russia in turn uses war with Georgia
to teach America a lesson about the dangers of overextension and
the price to be paid for humiliating a Great Power. Prudence suggests
we swallow our medicine and profit by it, tempering our ambitions
and our arrogance with a dose of reality.
But
under the King of Misrule, folly remains the order of the day. The
Bush White House tells itself American power knows no limits. All
that is required is that they show sufficient "will,"
and the rest of the world will buckle.
Not this
time. Russia has taken all it is going to take.
It beggars
the imagination to think that America could find itself in a nuclear
confrontation with a post-Soviet Russia. But if the White House
acts in accordance with its rhetoric, the next few weeks or even
days may witness just such a strategic catastrophe.
August
19, 2008
William
Lind is an analyst based in Washington, DC.
Copyright
© 2008 William S. Lind
William
Lind Archives
|