Whatcha Gonna Do When They Come for You?
by Steven LaTulippe
by Steven LaTulippe
DIGG THIS
I, Franklin
D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do declare
that said national emergency still continues to exist and pursuant
to said section to do hereby prohibit the hoarding gold coin, gold
bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States
by individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations...
~ President
Franklin D. Roosevelt, April 5, 1933
Well, they
went and did it.
Proving that
they have learned nothing from history, Congress passed the massive
$700 billion "bailout" bill that is allegedly going to
save our insolvent banking system. I was hoping against hope that
a populist rebellion might somehow stop the oligarchy from helping
itself to the taxpayers’ wallets, but it was not to be. In the end,
the plutocrats got their money.
Frankly, the
logic behind the House of Representative’s final vote was incomprehensible.
When the bill was a straightforward handout to the banks, they rejected
it. But after the bill went through the Senate – which added dozens
of pork-barrel spending projects and granted new Orwellian powers
to the IRS – the House approved it.
How on earth
could anyone rationalize voting for the second bill after they had
voted against the first one?
Beats me.
Either way,
our government took a fateful step down the road to perdition. This
payment won’t be the last, since the solvency problem is much bigger
than a mere $700 billion. By some accounts, trillions of dollars
of bad mortgage-backed paper is sloshing around in the financial
system. Most of it has no market, because no one knows if any of
it is actually worth anything.
What’s more,
the federal government is bankrupt. By any honest accounting, this
year’s budget deficit was already heading toward the $600–700 billion
range. Since the government can’t pay its existing bills, where
will it get the money for this bailout?
The feds will
either have to find new suckers to loan them more money, or they
will have to turn on the printing press and ignite a nasty bout
of hyperinflation.
But the scary
truth is that still more disasters are lurking just over the horizon.
First, as Senator Harry Reid let slip the other day, our insurance
industry is teetering on the brink. AIG has already gone under,
and at least one more major company is allegedly about to give up
its ghost. Once that domino falls, who knows how many more will
follow?
And close on
the heels of the insurance meltdown is the impending debacle in
commercial real estate. Greenspan’s bubble not only inflated residential
housing prices far above rational market levels, it also created
a similar bubble in office buildings and shopping malls. Many banks
and investment houses are just as awash in bad commercial real estate
paper as they are in subprime mortgages.
Is the federal
government going to take on these bad loans too?
If that isn’t
enough to raise the hair on your neck, the horror doesn’t stop there.
Since most state governments rely heavily on property taxes, their
balance sheets are starting to drown in red ink. When housing prices
drop by 25 or 30% and commercial real estate goes belly-up, so do
tax receipts. Yet, unlike the federal government, the states do
not control the printing press. They can’t inflate their way out
of their predicament.
Governor Schwarzenegger
of California has already asked the feds for a multi-billion dollar
"loan." He won’t be the last. (After having thrown huge
piles of cash at banks and insurance companies, can the feds refuse
to rescue a bankrupt state government? Politically speaking, I seriously
doubt it.)
Also waiting
in line at the pig trough is a gaggle of corporations. During last
week’s chaos, not many folks noticed that the big-three automobile
manufacturers got a multi-billion dollar handout from the taxpayers.
And now that a precedent has been established, look for other industries
(the airlines, for starters) to belly up to the taxpayers’ bar for
a shot of free "liquidity."
Can the government
possibly do this? Can it absorb the entire residential and commercial
real estate losses, bail out dozens of state governments, resuscitate
the insurance industry, and hand out cash to unprofitable corporations?
Not hardly...at
least not without resorting to the printing press, which will set
off a tsunami of hyperinflation. As history has shown over and over,
governments that spend themselves into a corner will inevitably
try to escape their predicament with counterfeit money. Although
this scam works in the short run, it causes much bigger problems
down the road. Hyperinflation destroys the very basis of economic
growth by poisoning the value of money. Without a stable currency,
businesses and individuals cannot make long-term plans, since no
one knows what anything will cost even weeks or months into the
future.
Which brings
us to gold.
Libertarians
and paleoconservatives have been discussing just such a hyperinflationary
scenario for years. For the most part, the consensus opinion has
centered on precious metals. Since governments can’t counterfeit
metal, gold generally holds its value whenever fiat currency is
debased.
While this
investment strategy is a good one, it comes with one major risk.
The reason
governments inflate their currency is to surreptitiously confiscate
wealth from those individuals who store their wealth in that currency.
If too many citizens shield their wealth by investing in gold, they
nullify the entire scam. Inflation "works" because citizens
are forced – by legal tender laws – to store their wealth in a medium
controlled by the government. As a government counterfeits its currency,
it sucks wealth from all of those people who hold that currency.
The government
cannot tolerate too many of its citizens successfully evading inflationary
confiscation. In a worst-case scenario, a headlong rush into gold
would destroy the dollar completely as individuals replaced it with
gold as a medium of wealth storage and exchange.
This cannot
be permitted under any circumstances, since it would undermine the
very foundations of our governing elite’s power.
That is not
to say that hyperinflation is the government’s only option. When
faced with bankruptcy, the government could behave responsibly.
It could bring its expenditures into balance with its revenue.
It could slash the welfare state, defund the military-industrial
complex, and withdraw it forces from the overseas Empire.
Unfortunately
– from the plutocracy’s perspective – such a policy would also massively
undermine its power and is, therefore, completely unacceptable.
If responsible
management of public finances is a non-starter, the only other alternative
is to rescue the dollar by banning private citizens from buying
or owning gold.
Given these
two options, does anyone doubt which one the government will choose?
If history
is any guide, those individuals who have correctly predicted that
our government’s policies will end in disaster – and who invest
heavily in gold – will be demonized as "hoarders" and
"extremists." In keeping with the theme of our age, such
investors might even be accused of "terrorism" (Which,
in a twisted way, makes sense. After all, if the government is going
to continue to fight the "War on Terror," it needs money.
And if the only way it can get money is by confiscating gold, then
those who resist the confiscation are "aiding and abetting
terrorism.")
Ominously,
this logic would permit the government to invoke the Patriot
Act and the infamous Military Commissions Act.
In practice,
actual confiscation would be easy. Most gold is held in ETFs or
bank vaults. The government could simply order these institutions
to hand their gold over to the US Treasury. In return, the depositors
would be issued compensation in the form of increasingly worthless
Federal Reserve Notes (probably at an exchange rate that heavily
favors the government. After all, the feds couldn’t allow "hoarders"
to make "windfall profits").
Those citizens
who hold physical gold would be somewhat more problematic. They
would presumably be given a "grace period" to hand over
their stash. After that, the feds might have to get a bit rough.
Since many folks would probably try to hide their gold, President
Obama would ultimately have no choice but to send federal agents
into the countryside and seize it. Given the recent demise of quaint
Anglo-Saxon legalisms – such as search warrants and Habeas Corpus
– this enterprise might not be as difficult as one might think.
(Maybe this could be a job for those creepy, Mugabe-style youth
brigades that have been popping up around the county.)
I realize that
a potentially violent government seizure of private property seems
farfetched – or even apocalyptic – but those who dismiss it out
of hand should remember their history. After all, our government
has done
this before.
October
13, 2008
Steven
LaTulippe [send him mail]
is a physician currently practicing in Ohio. He was an officer in
the United States Air Force for 13 years.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Steven
LaTulippe Archives
|