An Avalanche of World Events
by Steven LaTulippe
by Steven LaTulippe
This past month has
seen a veritable landslide of important events with social, political,
and economic ramifications for libertarians everywhere.
These incidents mark
several major historical turning points and deserve to be further
examined.
Issue #1: The European
Union is circling the bowl.
The massive statist
bureaucracy in Brussels, along with the political elites who have
made a life’s work out of destroying the sovereignty of numerous
ancient European nations, is running into a little problem.
Specifically, the governing
class has cooked up an Orwellian 232 page document that they claim
is a "constitution" for the European Union. This document
must be approved by the voters of the member nations before it goes
into effect.
Unfortunately for the
wizards in Brussels, the constitution’s chances of passage are starting
to look grim. It is currently lagging in the polls in several nations,
including France and the Netherlands. If it is defeated in one or
more major countries, its rout may slam the lid on attempts to create
a giant leviathan in Brussels to compete with the American leviathan
on the Potomac (and the pinheads
couldn’t even get the text of the constitution correct in a pre-vote
mailing to the voters).
Being somewhat of a
stickler about such things, the first questions coming to my mind
when reading of this were:
Q: How many pages must
a constitution contain in order to guarantee citizens their rights
and to sharply circumscribe the power of their government?
A: Probably not more
than two or three.
Q: How many pages must
a document contain in order to create a monstrous Total State which
will regulate every minute aspect of the nation’s economy and the
lives of its citizens?
A: Probably somewhere
in the neighborhood of 232.
In retrospect, it was
a crazy idea to attempt to weld together numerous peoples, each
with their own longstanding histories and traditions, under one
bloated government. There are too many historical rivalries and
ancient hatreds in Europe for this whole affair to have had any
chance whatsoever.
As the Union has increased
in its size, it has become even more unwieldy. The Union has fallen
into bitter infighting over foreign policy, budget discipline, agricultural
subsidies, and monetary policy.
The situation has been
exacerbated by the cultural sterility of the Union’s governing class.
The folks running things in Brussels are largely deracinated Menshevik
baby-boomers who are completely out of touch with the cultural and
spiritual necessities required to animate an authentic political
entity.
The European Union’s
new "government" thus inspires all the loyalty and commitment
of, say, the Ohio Department of Motor Vehicles.
All in all, the world is probably better off if this Frankenstein’s
monster heads off to the junk pile.
Issue #2: With liberals
like these, who needs neocons?
I read a news story
last week concerning the "centrist" Democratic Leadership
Council (DLC) and its prescription for the malaise currently ailing
the Democratic Party.
With my curiosity
aroused, I went to the DLC’s website (www.ndol.org),
to investigate.
What I found there confirmed
my opinions about our current political predicament and left me
in a cold sweat. As George Wallace once said, "There isn’t
a dime’s worth of difference" between the Republican and Democratic
Parties.
The DLC’s site is packed
with articles that read like the most fevered ravings of Bill Kristol
and Max Boot.
Here are a few sadly
typical quotes from the DLC which pretty much speak for themselves:
It's time
for the countries with the will and the capacity to intervene and
stop the killing to do so, in conjunction with the OAU force. That
means the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, and
Italy.
~ New Democrat Dispatch,
April 1, 2005, advocating Western intervention in the Sudan
Nothing would set
back the democratic cause in the region more than a premature American
disengagement from Iraq, where a critical democratic transition
is now underway. Irrespective of whether one supported or opposed
the war, we all have a strategic interest in seeing Iraq's experiment
in building a more just and democratic society succeed ~ and we
must hold the Bush Administration to its commitment to stay the
course in Baghdad.
~ Ronald D. Asmus and
Michael McFaul, March 9, 2004
In the weeks leading
up to the war in Iraq ~ and in the first days of war on the ground
~ a remarkable one-man show was unfolding in Europe. It was British
Prime Minister Tony Blair's eloquent insistence on standing his
ground in support of President Bush and of regime change in Baghdad
~ forcible if necessary ~ despite a tidal wave of homeland opposition.
~ Robert Philpot, April
15, 2003
The entire site is full
of this stuff. If you blot out the banner at the top, you’d swear
you were reading the Weekly Standard. The extent to which
militaristic elites have seized control of the bipartisan governing
structures of our nation is a scary sight to behold. The ideology
of empire is now the dominant political reality of our age.
Issue #3: Spooky
prophecies about the Pope.
While doing some research
about the John Paul II, I came across a site containing eerie prophecies
made by an Irish bishop, St. Malachy, in the 1100s. He allegedly
had "visions" while traveling in Rome which he wrote down
and gave to Pope Innocent II. In these documents, he predicted the
prominent traits of each of the subsequent 112 popes (including
anti-popes).
For instance, he labeled
Pope Celestine V (1294) Ex eremo celsus (elevated from a
hermit). Prior to his election he was, in fact, a hermit in the
monastery of Pouilles.
Malachy predicted that
the 180th pope would be Avis Ostiensis (the Bird
of Ostia). Pope Gregory IX served as the Cardinal of Ostia before
his election.
Malachy labeled the
266th pope (John Paul II) De labore Solis (of
the eclipse of the sun). Karol Wojtyla was born on May 18, 1920
during a solar eclipse, and was buried on April 8, 2005, during
another solar eclipse.
While many of these
read like horoscopes (bland sayings that can be applied in some
way to almost anyone), some of them are downright creepy. Even more
alarming, Malachy predicts that there are only two more popes until
the Apocalypse.
According to this Irish saint, the 267th pope will be
Gloria olivae (glory of the olives). What this means, I have
no idea. But it will be interesting to see if the pope chosen in
the upcoming conclave has some connection to this phrase.
The next pope after
Gloria olivae is identified as Petrus Romanus, or
Peter the Roman. Malachy states that this pope will guide the Church
through the tribulation at the end of times.
Being somewhat of a
skeptic, I have my doubts about these types of prophecies and hasten
to add that the Church makes no claims about any of Malachy’s prognostications
either. Nevertheless, if the guy who shows up next week on the balcony
of St. Peter’s is named "Oliver", it might be a good time
to start hording canned goods.
Better safe than sorry,
I always say.
Issue #4: Humorous
prophecies about the British Royal Family.
While surfing around
in some of the more "new age" corners of the web, I came
across claims that Nostradamus (some sites say it was Rasputin)
prophesized that if a member of the ancient Battenberg family ever
ascends the throne of England, it will mark the end of the British
monarchy. The sites went on to claim that Prince Charles has Battenberg
blood via his father, Prince Philip.
Nostradamus aside, one
must wonder if there has ever been a more hapless Prince of Wales
in history. Last week, thankfully, his seemingly cursed wedding
finally took place at the town hall in Windsor, England. The venue
was only a tad more majestic than one of those neon chapels on the
Vegas strip and was not attended by most of his family.
His first marriage was
a globally publicized debacle, his personal staff has been beset
by numerous sordid sex scandals, and his second wedding had the
misfortune of being originally scheduled on the same day as the
largest funeral in planetary history. Since the Queen’s mother lived
to be over a hundred, and the Queen herself is still going strong
into her late 70s, it is probable that Charles will be a senior
citizen himself before ever ascending the throne.
Polls in the UK show
that there is a growing dissatisfaction with the idea of Prince
Charles becoming king. But one needn’t be a prophet to predict that
this is one Battenberg whose string of personal disasters may terminate
what had been the most prominent ruling family in the world.
Issue #5: Is the
Catholic Church a post nation-state fourth generation force in world
politics?
While watching the Pope’s
funeral last week, I was especially surprised at the European turnout.
Hundreds of thousands made their way across the continent to pay
their last respects, and many slept on the streets and sidewalks
of Vatican City in order to attend the ceremony.
This is ironic in that
the reputation of contemporary Europeans is anything but pious.
The general stereotype is that they are awash in socialist dependency
and cultural decadence. Nevertheless, something about Pope John
Paul II called them home to their roots. Perhaps this will mark
a turning point in Europe’s history.
Geopolitical thinkers
such as William Lind frequently discuss what they call "fourth
generation warfare." Our world is, they claim, entering a period
marked by a crisis of the nation state and a reversion of people’s
loyalties to non-state entities.
In my humble opinion,
I think that this crisis is a good thing. The nation state, which
reached its apogee in the hideous 20th Century, has given
humanity little more than bureaucracy, concentration camps, overbearing
regulation, and devastating wars. By contrast, the elites who worship
the state (from communists and fascists to liberals and neoconservatives)
will fight bitterly to prevent its passing. For them, the nation
state is an unrivaled tool which enables them to impose their fevered
hallucinations onto society at large.
Hopefully, the vacuum
left by the nation state’s demise will be by something more than
just Road Warrior-style chaos.
This general theory
is relevant to the pope’s funeral in two ways.
First, it was amazing
to see the massive turnout for a man who essentially had no formal
worldly power whatsoever. He had no political pork or "favors"
to offer his followers. The people who mourned him did so of their
own free will. People followed him by choice, not compulsion, and
his church is maintained by donations, not taxation. During the
several days leading up to his funeral, the police stated that there
was not a single crime reported anywhere in Vatican City despite
the presence of literally millions of pilgrims.
One of the
most frequent criticisms of libertarianism is the claim that it
is a libertine philosophy. Because we advocate the legalization
of drugs, etc., it is assumed that we advocate indulgence. These
critics maintain that our advocacy of minimal government will lead
to the broad degeneration of society into a moral and ethical cesspool.
This mistake is what I call "governo-centrism" (i.e.,
the idea that the government is the center of the human experience
and the ultimate arbiter of morality). Such critics do not distinguish
between the immorality of engaging in vices and the philosophical
issues involved in enacting their legal prohibition. Similarly,
these critics believe that our desire to abolish the welfare state
means that we want poor people to starve, or that our opposition
to socialized medicine means that we want the sick and disabled
to "die in the streets."
The life (and death)
of Pope John Paul II offers a concrete example of the power of ideas
in uplifting the lives of individuals. No laws or government regulations
dictated the actions and beliefs of the people during the whole
experience in Rome. People came together, often at great cost and
inconvenience, in response to a personal religious calling.
That funeral was thus
a monument to the power of free men and free women to engage in
a moral life without any form of compulsion whatsoever.
The second issue raised
by the funeral was the question of how most political leaders around
the world are esteemed in comparison with this pope. Can anyone
think of a single head of state who commands this sort of respect
and reverence from his people? Are there any governments or political
movements anywhere in Europe that imbue people with the emotion
that was on display last week?
The Church, and other
similar entities around the world, is a voluntary organization that
is steeped in history and culture. It diligently attempts to instruct
people on the requirements of moral living. As such, it offers a
vision of life that upholds civilization without leaning on the
obligatory and often abusive power of the state.
If the nation-state
truly is in crisis, then it behooves us all to nurture those organizations
which hopefully will someday fill in the void left behind by its
demise. I saw hope for that possibility in the teeming millions
at the Vatican.
April
13, 2005
Steven
LaTulippe [send him mail]
is a physician currently practicing in Ohio. He was an officer in
the United States Air Force for 13 years.
Copyright
© 2005 LewRockwell.com
Steven
LaTulippe Archives
|