Delusional…to the Bitter End
by Steven LaTulippe
by Steven LaTulippe
"What
a loss I shall be to the arts!!"
Such
were the last words of Roman Emperor Nero Claudius Drusus Germanicus
as he lay dying by his own hand nearly two thousand years ago. That
a man with a wooden stage presence, tone-deaf vocals, and five thumbs
on the lyre could fancy himself to be the greatest artist of his
generation gives bitter testimony to the delusions of power. His
fantasy was, of course, inflated by swarms of sycophants and opportunists
who hovered around his court and eagerly fed his ego.
It
was thoughts of this comic tragedy that swirled in my mind as I
watched President Bush’s press conference last week. His tortuous
logic and fractured thinking made we worry more than ever about
the direction of our Republic.
As
each previous explanation for our Iraqi invasion disintegrates in
mid-air, like clay pigeons at a trap shoot, we are left with nothing
but a series of elite delusions to validate the continuing debacle
of our occupation.
The
first delusion rests with the shop-worn slogan that we are "bringing
democracy to Iraq." The issue of whether it is our business
to determine the form of government for another nation aside…exactly
what do our interventionist elites mean by "democracy"?
And why do they think that imposing such a system there is possible?
Our
leaders have clearly stated that Islamists will not be welcome in
the new "democratic" government of Iraq. The occupation
forces have closed down newspapers for the crime of printing "lies."
The governing blueprint includes American bases on Iraqi soil indefinitely,
US control of their budget, and our continued command of their armed
forces.
By
what twist of logic could this be called "democracy"?
And
why should the Iraqi people agree to it?
And
what facts about the history and culture of Iraq make our elites
think that this transformation will ever be successful?
The
second delusion is that of "multiculturalism." Iraq is
not really a country at all, in the organic sense of the word. It
is an unstable amalgamation of various rival tribes who were patched
together in a typically diabolical act of British imperialism. The
only possible way that this chimera can exist in any stable form
is via the violence of a despot (such as Saddam Hussein).
A
rational exit strategy for Iraq would consist of splitting the country
into its Kurdish, Sunni, and Shiite portions and allowing each to
decide their own form of government…quickly followed by an American
withdrawal.
But
our elites worship at the altar of multiculturalism. This commandment
demands that Iraq conform to our elite’s vision of America…namely,
it must be a "proposition nation" bereft of religion,
culture, and nationalist identity.
The
Empire will never acquiesce to the partition of Iraq, because such
an event would undermine the central tenet of their multicultural
religion. And since ideologues always demand that reality conform
to the dictates of their belief system, no amount of war, terror,
and destitution in Iraq will sway them from this delusional vision.
And
besides, what would the failure of multiculturalism in Iraq portend
for the future of an America wedded to just such a vision?
Our
elite’s psyche would just as soon not go there.
The third delusion of Empire is that of "credibility."
Specifically, we are now being told that the initial reasons for
our invasion no longer matter, since withdrawal at this point would
lead to a loss of America’s credibility.
But
just what do our elites mean by this term?
The
inhabitants of Washington have come to believe that they are the
rightful rulers of the globe. They view America’s responsibility
to intervene anywhere and everywhere as axiomatic. This is what
they assert by making declarations of "benevolent world hegemony."
But
whose credibility is really at stake?
Many
Americans openly questioned the pre-war claims of WMDs in Iraq.
We derided accusations that Iraq was cooperating with bin Laden.
And we doubted the feasibility of creating a functioning democracy
there.
If
anything, a withdrawal would enhance our credibility.
But
in order to make an Imperial system work (if it can ever actually
work), our leaders must continually make threats directed at foes
in the far reaches of the globe. They must be able to intimidate
other peoples and nations into obedience to their agenda. It would
otherwise be impractical to have to fight a war every time a controversial
issue arose.
Thus,
the elite’s definition of "credibility" is really just
the ability to bully other nations into submission. Such credibility
would be useless to a nation which was dedicated to minding its
own business (as the America of our Founders once was). But to a
nation grasping for world domination, such credibility is vital.
Looking
at the current situation in Iraq, it is clear that our mission there
is an abject failure. Our troops are dying by the dozen, our allies
are looking for the exit, and no rational plan exists to create
a stable government.
The
only silver lining in this odious cloud lies in the value of debunking
the self-delusions of our rulers. The profound shock of an embarrassing
retreat from Iraq just might prompt some of our leaders to reassess
their ideology. It might also awaken the American people to the
dangerous consequences of passive acquiescence to the excesses of
our ruling elite.
But
as the death of Nero so succinctly demonstrates, this is not a foregone
conclusion. Deeply held, megalomaniacal beliefs often die hard.
April
19, 2004
Steven
LaTulippe [send him mail]
is a physician currently practicing in Ohio. He was an officer in
the United States Air Force for 13 years.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
Steven
LaTulippe Archives
|