Michael
Rubin – Part Deux
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
Michael
Rubin has had a very bad week. One wonders about the coaching staff
over at the American Enterprise Institute and National Review.
Referees across the country called strike one on
May 18th. Rubin’s second strike immediately followed
on May
19th.
What
do we know about this minor-league neoconservative, Michael Rubin?
Well, he is indeed a rookie. He
is young. He trained at Yale in biology and history. What about
his performance? In politics, people like Rubin can simply pass
along fabrications as if they are true, and he has done so with
abandon. On the other hand, in baseball you have to get it right.
Actual performance, real events, the rock solid history, the numbers.
This in mind, let’s look at the Rubin record.
In
the Winter 2002 edition of the Middle East Quarterly, Rubin
wrote on how to free Iraq, and rid ourselves of that damn Saddam
Hussein. Rubin concludes:
"September
11 has helped to persuade the region that the United States isn't
going to take it anymore. Even onerous regimes are eager or
willing to be part of the U.S. coalition against Usama bin Ladin's
terrorism. Under resolute U.S. leadership, some of this spirit
could be mobilized against Iraq.…
[Ankara, Amman, Kuwait City, and Riyadh] want to see a plan that
is focused, determined, and close-ended. If the United States
can produce one, its regional allies will fall into line."
Let’s
see if I have this straight – as an advisor to the OSP inside the
nerve center of the Pentagon, helping make Iraq policy leading to
war, Michael advocated a plan for Saddam’s removal that was "focused,
determined, and close-ended." I guess the focused, determined,
and close-ended plan for the aftermath wasn’t Michael’s area.
In
2001, Michael wrote about his experience at universities in Northern
Iraq, in the Kurdish autonomous zone. His premise? Sanctions are
actually helpful for the Kurds. He said this because he saw a lot
of selling, buying, trading. Lots of resources finding their way
into the American-protected Kurdish north. Clearly, this young man
did not spend much time on the role of the state and the individual,
and the nature of markets. And why should he? Having demonstrated
his economic expertise, young Michael concludes that while sanctions
are helping northern Iraq, we really should pursue a sanction-free
North. We should not worry that lifting sanctions there will further
split the country, because "The Kurds themselves, many of them
patriotic veterans of
the Iraqi Army do not wish to split from Iraq; they do want a federal,
unified and democratic Iraq. Their only problem is with Saddam Husayn
himself. Until he is removed, nothing can proceed."
Having
touched for luck the trusty "remove Saddam" mantra, he
also said, "In all, compared to the rest of the Middle East,
with the exception of Turkey and Israel, northern Iraq is a political
utopia."
While inaccurate and naïve, the statement has all the charm of a
wide-eyed 16-year-old seeking to explain the world as he sees it,
conjuring up the fantastical idea that one may use the words "political"
and "utopia" in the same sentence and still be of this
world.
To
be fair, Michael is partially correct, in the sense that the US
protected and sponsored Kurdish government in Iraq was still decentralized
and had not yet become very confiscatory. In any case, Rubin’s ideas
for partial sanctions or anything else contained in this article
were never made US policy.
While
neoconservatives in power may not listen to Michael, they do tend
to use him as an attack dog. His May 2002 National Review
article about the United Nation's High Commissioner for Human Rights
is entitled "Mary
Robinson, War Criminal?" This inflammatory title reflects
Mary Robinson’s interest, among other things, in Palestinian human
rights. She had initiated a drive to investigate the Jenin killings.
Such bias and double standards, laments Michael. He wrote this scurrilous
attack while attached to the Leonard Davis Institute for International
Relations at Hebrew University. In any case, the UN did not try
Robinson as a war criminal, and the world did not listen to Michael
Rubin. I think we are seeing a pattern here.
Again
in 2002, Rubin predicts how Iraq will fight. He wrote,
"The
Republican Guard may be Iraq's military elite, but, unlike the
fanatical soldiers of Al Qaeda, they are basically mercenaries
Saddam's Baathism having long ago become the ideological
equivalent of 1980s-era Soviet communism. The Republican Guard
serves Saddam because of fear and money. When
the United States attacks, that fear will surely be counterbalanced
by the prospect of facing America's much more fearsome army if
they resist."
This
bit of the neoconservative theme song has been proven, again and
again, to be ignorant and wrong. American soldiers pay the price
in Iraq every day and night.
To
be fair, Rubin’s coaching is obsolete. The National Review
after its purges of right individualists and paleo-conservatives
in the 70’s and 80’s is, like the old Soviet Union, feeble and sclerotic.
As Murray Rothbard observed in 1992, "…Bill
Buckley [was] the Mikhail Gorbachev of the conservative movement."
Clearly, Rubin’s whole team is in trouble.
Not
surprisingly, Michael Rubin is not quite ready for the major leagues.
The History Channel had Rubin scheduled in New York City this week.
In the wake of Rubin’s first wild swing at me, they kindly asked
if I’d like to come on the show with him. I ran to the bullpen,
eager for my chance on the field.
The
History Channel called later in the day, and said, alas, Mr. Rubin
rather nervously refused appear with me. Since the game would be
about the hard facts of our respective words and actions, he ran
off the field.
The
current neoconservative dilemma, a fading twilight shadowed by increasing
legislative and judicial interest compounded by an ever distracted
frat boy in the executive suite, reminds me of a great poem. You
know it well, and it contains several lessons for the neoconservatives
– most of whom have never set foot on a baseball diamond.
After
all, it is not a social-democratic game.
"Rubin
at the Bat"
with
apologies to Ernest Lawrence Thayer
It looked
extremely rocky for the DC nine that day;
The score stood two to four, with but an inning left to play.
So, when Rummy died at second, and Wolfie did the same,
A pallor wreathed the features of the patrons of the game.
A straggling
few got up to go, leaving there the rest,
With that hope which springs eternal within the human breast.
For they thought: "If only Rubin could get a whack at that,"
They'd put even money now, with Rubin at the bat.
But Feith
preceded Rubin, and likewise so did Perle,
And the former was a pudd'n, and the latter was a girl.
So on that stricken multitude a deathlike silence sat;
For there seemed but little chance of Rubin's getting to the
bat.
But Feith
let drive a "single," to the wonderment of all.
And the much-despised Cheney "tore the cover off the ball."
And when the dust had lifted, and they saw what had occurred,
There was Cheney safe at second, and Feith a-huggin' third.
Then
from the gladdened multitude went up a joyous yell-
It rumbled in the mountaintops, it rattled in the dell;
It struck upon the hillside and rebounded on the flat;
For Rubin, mighty Rubin, was advancing to the bat.
There
was ease in Rubin's manner as he stepped into his place,
There was pride in Rubin's bearing and a smile on Rubin's
face;
And when responding to the cheers he lightly doffed his hat,
No stranger in the crowd could doubt 'twas Rubin at the bat.
Ten thousand
eyes were on him as he rubbed his hands with dirt,
Five thousand tongues applauded when he wiped them on his
shirt;
Then when the writhing pitcher ground the ball into his hip,
Defiance glanced in Rubin's eye, a sneer curled Rubin's lip.
And now
the leather-overed sphere came hurtling through the air,
And Rubin stood a-watching it in haughty grandeur there.
Close by the sturdy batsman the ball unheeded sped;
"That ain't my style," said Rubin. "Strike one," the umpire
said.
From
the benches, black with people, there went up a muffled roar,
Like the beating of the storm waves on the stern and distant
shore.
"Kill him! kill the umpire!" shouted someone on the stand;
And it's likely they'd have killed him had not Rubin raised
his hand.
With
a smile of neo-charity great Rubin's visage shone;
He stilled the rising tumult, he made the game go on;
He signaled to the pitcher, and once more the spheroid flew;
But Rubin still ignored it, and the umpire said, "Strike two."
"Fraud!"
cried the maddened thousands, and the echo answered "Fraud!"
But one scornful look from Rubin and the audience was awed;
They saw his face grow stern and cold, they saw his muscles
strain,
And they knew that Rubin wouldn't let the ball go by again.
The sneer
is gone from Rubin's lips, his teeth are clenched in hate,
He pounds with cruel vengeance his bat upon the plate;
And now the pitcher holds the ball, and now he lets it go,
And now the air is shattered by the force of Rubin's blow.
Oh, somewhere
in this favored land the sun is shining bright,
The band is playing somewhere, and somewhere hearts are light;
And somewhere men are laughing, and somewhere children shout,
But there is no joy in AEI: Mighty Rubin has struck out.
May
21, 2004
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final four and
a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives with
her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley, and writes a
bi-weekly column on defense issues with a libertarian perspective
for militaryweek.com.
Copyright ©
2004 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|