Of
Mice and Men
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
"Mickey
Mouse is, to me, a
symbol of independence. He was a means to an end."
~
Walt Disney
Justin
Raimondo’s precise, clear and accurate description of neoconservativism
as "an
authoritarian power cult" is both encouraging and exciting.
It’s
encouraging, because he has named the beast. A Trotskyist-Straussian-Wohlstetterian-Kristollian
philosophical tsunami struck our shores before dawn, and we have
now awakened to widespread and costly damage to the ideas and way
of thinking about the world that once made America both free and
great. Authoritarian power cult is an excellent description of neoconservativism.
It’s
exciting, because we can now see the cult’s native vulnerability,
one shared by cults everywhere. At their core, cults are authoritarian
and power-oriented. Luckily, it is within the very circle of Plato’s
21st century self-appointed ruling guardians, those who
envision the glorious utopia that would be possible if only the
rest of us would simply shut up and do what we are told, that
we find the antidote to the present day political crisis in America.
The authoritarian power center relies on the rest of us abnegating
our own judgment, individually and systematically. For neoconservativism,
we are also required to abnegate our belief in the ideas contained
in the Constitution and other early American statements of man’s
relation to the state, and the role of the federation.
In
the military, we are taught to trust in those who have gone before
and stand above, without introspection or examination. Occasional
thinking and study is needed, but collectivism is how soldiers and
armies are put together, and stay together. Without that abnegation
of personal judgment in favor of the judgment of a collective authority,
the thing can fall apart. This problem has always challenged military
commanders. It does so today in Iraq as they struggle to keep their
troops safe, satisfied and motivated in their daily constabulary
duties under fire. The collective judgment façade is starting
to fall apart in the face of what soldiers actually see around them,
not just while on patrols but in the barracks as they hear the authoritarian
message ringing increasingly shrill and hollow. No
wonder a commander felt the need to craft his unit’s "letter
to home" himself and merely solicit signatures, not input,
from his troops.
One
needs training and practice to reliably and consistently suborn
to others. I attended Air Force ROTC summer camp in 1980, and it
was one of my first real experiences with the phenomenon of power
mad authoritarianism. It was really quite incredible fun. At the
camp, we were divided into flights, each with a training officer.
Another flight’s training officer, a Captain, became obsessed with
a group of four Virginia Military Institute cadets from our flight.
This man would come over frequently to help "train" us.
The
Capitan wore a dark mustache squared off at the sides of the upper
lip. While this was the only authorized presentation of a mustache
in the Air Force at the time, we came to believe it signified a
Fascistic id struggling for expression.
Being
from Virginia Military Institute and having spent their entire college
careers in far more restrictive and authoritarian climes, the four
musketeers had the idea that ROTC summer camp really was a summer
camp. The Capitan wanted instant obedience from them, but even more,
he wanted to see fear and trembling in the eyes of these cadets.
It was one of those situations where someone wasn’t going to get
what they wanted.
Now,
in a designed utopian world – the unhappy ones should have been
the VMI cadets, but as you can imagine, they had a wonderful time.
One day the Capitan lectured them on the rules of the uniform, of
bearing, and the seriousness of the training camp. A day later all
four showed up in formation wearing plastic Mickey Mouse sunglasses.
Standing tall, in formation, pressed uniforms, straight faces, eyes
forward, and Mickey.
The
instructor was infuriated.
For
their many transgressions, the Capitan would assign penalty marches,
at his command. The four always obeyed instantly, marching as instructed,
including at one point into a tall hedge where they dutifully stomped
and slogged, if I may borrow a word from the distinguished Mr. Rumsfeld,
for several minutes until Capitan looked back and noticed. Alas
and alack, the challenge of central planning!
Capitan
went after them, apoplectic and screaming. The rest of us enjoyed
the spectacle. At the time, I didn’t realize we were getting a lesson
on combating intellectual terrorism.
It
isn’t that difficult. You have to maintain a certain reality-based
perspective, understand and accurately assess the enemy’s motivations
and tactics, and if necessary, fight asymmetrically, never against
their strengths and always their weaknesses. This would be the solution
that Rumsfeld is looking for in the
slog against terrorism – unfortunately he sent his memo to the
wrong people. Under Secretary for Policy Feith and Deputy Secretary
Wolfowitz, at least, are sure to return answers to Rumsfeld that
have nothing to do with a U.S. foreign policy that is antagonistic,
aggressive, and morally bankrupt, and everything to do with ways
to increase the body count, and make the numbers look better.
Neoconservative
strengths include tight intellectual conformity and ideological
gatekeeping, dutifully ensured by ever-alert and defensive Frums,
Kristols and Krauthammers. Neoconservatives are practiced masters
of repetitive and imaginative storylines, fabrications, insinuations
and name calling when it gets hot in the kitchen. Therefore in combating
these strengths, we should be intellectually independent and challenging,
open to ideas and perspectives than can help in the battles that
lie ahead of us. We shouldn’t need storylines to repeat, just accurate
information to share.
Name
calling is not necessary, although it seems to be getting more difficult
even to describe them honestly as adherents of Irving
Kristol’s neoconservativism. They are correct to resist the
label, I suppose, as neoconservativism is a misnomer of majestic
proportions. Neo-Jacobinism
is the name that fits far more accurately than neoconservative,
as no rational person would define a "new" conservative
as an advocate of perpetual war to promote abstract global morality
through military imperialism, propped up by muscular national socialism
at home.
Neoconservative
weaknesses are far more interesting. The walls of the ideological
lockbox within which they do their best work must seem to be falling
in on them; enemies probing just outside the bars, and every visitor
a potential Delilah. This paranoia makes our job not only easier,
but entertaining as well. They are known for careful and long term
strategizing, but in fact their
long held strategies absent the energy of new perspectives and
accurate information become quaint intellectual Maginot lines. Indeed,
how very French of the neocons!
While
self-assessed by the Perles and Cheneys and Kristols from within
the intellectual lockbox, secure behind the Maginot line, as a strength
neoconservative willingness to sacrifice the lives of others
to send messages is instead a fatal weakness. The ongoing investigation
to determine which of the President’s loyalists committed the federal
crime of leaking a NOC-listed agent, endangering her contacts overseas
and at home, is significant. Not that the crime was done, but that
it was done to send a message to a certain group of Americans who
might speak out against neoconservative motivations and tactics
in bringing this nation to war in Iraq, and future wars. 130,000
Americans in Iraq, an unnecessary percentage of whom are dying and
being physically and mentally wounded at
an unacceptable cost-benefit ratio, are also intended to send
a message, this one to the rest of the world.
The
new Jacobin’s willingness to offer other people’s lives and livelihoods
as a blood sacrifice to an abstract but rapacious god of security-through-empire
might be seen as a strength by some, but it is in fact the neoconservative’s
greatest weakness.
In
addition to building on the rock of truth, honesty and personal
commitment to preserve America as a constitutional republic, at
peace with the world and a model of real liberty, we should also
put on our Mickey Mouse sunglasses and have a little more fun with
these welterweight fascistas.
October
27, 2003
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a recently retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final
four and a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now
lives with her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley.
Copyright ©
2003 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|