Solutions
for the Pirate Problem
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
The latest
Foreign Policy web-only
exclusive, written by neoconservative J. Peter Pham, is an analysis
of the Somali piracy problem, something Pham has been assessing
for some time. The subtitle of the article "Why the U.S. Navy
Can’t Win this Fight" is appealing in its prescience.
But what the
author really means to say is that the U.S. Navy can only win the
fight with the help of other navies, UN and US-led nation-building
in Somalia (both in Puntland and presumably Somaliland which have
functioning self-government, as well as in the southern Ethiopian-occupied
Somalia, which does not).
Rather than
being liberals mugged by reality, neo-conservatives can be likened
to muggers promised redemption for a few public good works. Their
souls chained by a sense of limit on every good thing, eager to
appease and please their gangbosses, and with an unshakeable faith
in the use of force on the weak – neoconservatives persist in the
halls of government and throughout the government-dependent media.
Hoodlums in
suits they truly are, although it’s possible some of them mean well.
But high-minded muggers cannot imagine real solutions to the problems
of sea piracy. Instead, they put forth more state-on-individual
intervention, more national and international bureaucracy. Like
other criminals, they suppose the rest of us will pay for it, in
blood and honor, and be grateful we were spared our very skins.
The
history of private security is not glorious, inevitably souring
with its proximity to government contracts and politicians. Nonetheless,
it met – and meets – a need for commercial security that offers
a decentralized way to think about the problem of robbers, whether
they be Robin Hoods, out-of-work fishermen, teenage boys – or the
global money launderers than make this aspect of the world go round.
Popular movies
like The
Thomas Crown Affair, and the American love affair with our
individualistic, independent and armed forbearers tell one side
of the story. The notoriety and faithlessness of the global defense
contractors working with – and against – governments for cash and
ideology – as seen in this season’s 24
– tells the other side.
Every clue
is available to government decision-makers – yet the obvious solutions
to piracy and indiscriminate hostage-taking escape the Obamites
and congressional Republicrats. To solve the problem of cargo and
crew seizure for ransom, decentralized decision-making and decentralize
actions will work best, at minimal cost, with minimal destruction
and violence.
Insurance rates
in the Gulf of Aden have
risen tenfold. This recent spate of news coverage belies the
fact that sea piracy has been around for centuries – and indeed
we already know something about how to reduce it. In the Straits
of Malacca, South China Sea and Indonesian waters, insurance rates
have increased drastically, routes altered, and some freight companies
have hired onboard security guards. A 2004
study explains
"These
guards … are being deployed discreetly, because the legal status
of armed guards on board commercial vessels is not clear under
international law. …If the guards use deadly force, they and their
employers may be criminally liable. Yet the policy is pursued
because it is working; numerous, potentially deadly piracy attacks
are being thwarted on a daily basis by the mere presence of armed
guards, who, working in groups of four to eight per ship, often
do not have to fire even a single shot in order to keep the pirates
at bay. Ship owners also favor hiring armed private security guards
because the practice may help them negotiate better insurance
premiums.
It goes on:
"The deterrence effect can also be achieved when pirates know
or expect that the ships' crews themselves carry firearms. Pirates
deliberately avoid Russian- and U.S.-flagged ships, for example,
because they believe that many of them carry small arsenals for
protection." Incidentally, the crew of the US-flagged Alabama
was not armed – and yet was
still able to get the better of the four Kalashnikov-armed hijackers.
This heroism is individual and team based, autonomous. Unlike the
famously overplayed stories of a Flight 93 passenger uprising –
where no after-action interviews may be conducted – we will be subjected
to far more noise today about the heroism of
Naval commanders and Navy snipers hidden on the fantail of the USS
Bainbridge.
A business-oriented,
personal responsibility-friendly, insurance rate-enhancing approach
will never be recommended, suggested, or condoned by "state
sovereignty" types. American missions must be justified, sunk
cost in a global police force rationalized. Obamites and their neoconservative
allies, around the world and regardless of their political coats,
prefer war, prefaced by political and economic intervention of those
perceived to be weaker or less worthy than ourselves.
Perhaps
one
of the companies formerly known as Blackwater will see new opportunities
in private commerce protection. Of course, they’d need plenty of
subsidies and guaranteed long-term contracts. No need to advocate
decentralized market-based solutions just yet – let’s wait for more
state-sanctioned war, more justification for American hostility
and use of force around the world, more generalized fear here at
home. Then, perhaps Xe or a subsidiary will jump in the game, complete
with congressional blessings and taxpayer cash.
Whether the
drug war, the poverty war, the war on terror, or the war on piracy
– for our government, it’s always first things first. Establish
the moral high ground of the state, centralize decision-making,
bureaucratize and internationalize the legitimate policy discussion,
drum fear and uncertainty into the hearts of markets and populations,
demonize the "enemy" and smear as co-conspirators any
individual actors offering non-state solutions, and make the erstwhile
victims as helpless as possible.
We could lighten
up on sovereigngreed oriented regulation on shipping companies
and freighter captains, and let the real producers of wealth decide
how to proceed. We could take a look at where some of this ransom
money is being laundered, and with no additional bureaucracy, easily
shut down some of our white-collar friends. Instead, Washington
is alive with possibility – tut-tutting excitedly about international
or sub-regional coast guards, invasion of Somalia for its own good,
academic study of the pirate tactics of 17-year-old boys, and the
barbarous behavior of others.
April
15, 2009
LRC
columnist Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. [send
her mail], a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, has written on
defense issues with a libertarian perspective for MilitaryWeek.com,
hosted the call-in radio show American
Forum, and blogs occasionally for Huffingtonpost.com
and Liberty and Power.
To receive automatic announcements of new articles, click
here.
Copyright ©
2009 Karen Kwiatkowski
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|