Who
Really Wants to Be President?
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
DIGG THIS
At the first
presidential debate, the candidates of the Left-Right Party Ra’ed
the bailout, Ra’ed the war, and Boom-di-A’ed the Warfare-Welfare
State of America.
But that boat’s
sinking fast. The fundamental effectiveness of our military prowess
has long been in doubt, and its displays are way past dismaying.
We spend and spend, bomb and bomb some more, kill, maim and murder
our "enemies," research and deploy all kinds of defensive
and offensive technologies. Yet Americans feel less safe and more
hated than ever. It turns out people fight best and longest for
reasons of the heart, and the heart cannot be broken. This is why
we will ultimately leave Afghanistan, we will leave Iraq, and we
will abandon the rest of our imperial outposts, with nothing to
show for it but some formerly enriched American companies and some
formerly enriched people, their parasitic success diminished by
constant fear of prosecution and the realities of contract cancellation.
Ultimately,
Americans resent money spent abroad, and the people who spend it.
McCain with his strange "Country First" slogan and Obama
with his domestic-welfare-through-more-state-spending message are
both trying to appeal to this sentiment – even as they remain wholly
accountable to pro-war commentators and donors.
The state will
attempt to solve the current dilemma by bringing its military-security-prison
spending home. It’s already happening, with Blackwater
in Juneau, and on
the continental US, and in a hundred other ways, only some of
them involving tasers and concertina wire.
The M-S-P complex
is one unhappy group of voracious and powerful parasites, and they
won’t be satisfied as easily as the current crop of needy investment
banks. There is an important bitter lesson in the weekend’s Wall
Street bailout – one Americans need absorb slowly, completely, and
thoughtfully.
The bailout,
a completely counterproductive expenditure of our futures by non-representative
tyrants, could have been prevented by small "r" republicanism.
For a brief moment, the Party Republicans in the House rediscovered
their Paulian core, and resisted, for a whole half weekend, the
paper pump priming compulsion of Our Government and Its Allies.
They had a
flash of strength thanks to that antiquated and magnificent republican
mechanism – the people’s voice! The common men and women of this
country, young and old, white and black, poor and not poor, communicated
consensus to Washington. That consensus was "NO!" Their
antipathy for any bailout of Wall Street ranged from a common sense
of "NO!" to a more righteous justice sense of "NO!"
to a scholarly and economic logic sense of "NO!" It was
an interesting conundrum for Washington.
The American
people lost that battle. Inflationary
theft of current resources and future prosperity of the great
mass of Americans who understood and opposed the bailout was the
order of the day.
Yet, the collapse
of the warfare state, and the evaporation of the current sheen of
domestic tranquility and prosperity are coming. Yes, the government
and its business and media partners, like all parasites faced with
starvation and scratching will tighten their grip, profusely irritating
the host, weakening our resolve. The Ron Paul Revolution will seem
not to have worked, as we watch a presidential campaign narrowed
down to earnest Tweedle-Dee and earnester Tweedle-Dum.
But sometimes
appearances deceive. In fact, the Ron Paul Revolution continues
to grow – and the latest financial crime against the people has
served well to broadly expand
awareness of the wisdom of sound money and transparent constitutional
government. The blatant fecklessness of Washington insiders and
controllers in this pseudo-crisis has helped people get smarter
about the state, its imbedded cronies, and their dangerous capabilities
and intentions.
My question
is this: At this time, with an awakening American populace – sharpened
by their own growing financial insecurity, intellectually honed
by exposure to the logic and truth of the Paulian message – who
the heck really wants to be President?
McCain blindly
lifted two Ron Paul planks as his own (Prosperity and Peace) and
chose a solid anti-abortion, regular-folk vice president who wasn’t
Ron Paul. He did this because he wanted to win votes, at least before
last week. But now conservative
media and his own staff, through idiotic press strategies and
pre-debate vacillation, seem determined to sink Palin and McCain.
Americans don’t like Hamletian candidates – McCain and his people
know this, so one must assume this was a political Freudian slip.
Then you have
the poll leader, the friendly face of socialist warmongering, who
cannot even garner the support of the
royal Democratic family, which seems to prefer Palin-McCain,
at least for the next four years. Obama’s own party, having made
its name in racial division, simultaneously embraces that pretext
for failure.
In the race
for the presidency, what we are really seeing is a race to lose
the presidency. And while it may not be immediately apparent, this
is a total win for the American people, and the country.
A reluctant
president, barely elected by voters and clearly refused by the vast
majority of Americans who either voted otherwise, or voted "none
of the above," is a lot different than the current tyrant.
While Bush 43 was electorally rejected by the majority of Americans,
this living proof of the Peter Principle actually wanted to do his
god’s work in the oval office. The next president will be infused
with doubt, not fervor.
The
next president will face a panicked Congress that has tasted blood
– some of it their own. The next president – having sold themselves
as competent and "Not George W. Bush" will be assaulted
on all sides by a reality
not fashioned by their advisors. The next president will be
ripped apart by the rapacious demands of the M-S-P beast and a new
reality blasted out for them by inflation-pinched, angry Americans
no longer in awe of their stupid king, or his complacent, genuflecting
Congress.
No matter who
"wins," both candidates now understand that there will
be no bread. They do realize, however, that the circuses will be
held as scheduled, in a certain oval arena. No one, not even battle
scarred McCain and the shining breastplated Palin, want to play
that gig.
September
29, 2008
LRC
columnist Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. [send
her mail], a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, has written on
defense issues with a libertarian perspective for MilitaryWeek.com,
hosted the call-in radio show American
Forum, and blogs occasionally for Huffingtonpost.com
and Liberty and Power.
To receive automatic announcements of new articles, click
here.
Copyright ©
2008 Karen Kwiatkowski
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|