Is
the American Enterprise Really War in the Caucasus?
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
DIGG THIS
Years ago,
I optimistically read AEI fellow Jeane
Kirkpatrick’s defense of our foreign policy hypocrisy, entitled
Dictatorships
and Double Standards. Even as a Cold War conservative at the
time, I recall feeling that she protested too much. The American
Enterprise Institute’s sustained role in propagandizing American
wars, including the creative
and carelessly contrived 2003 invasion of Iraq, certainly belies
the organization’s moniker.
Paying attention
to the real work of the AEI is almost enough to turn a person into
an anti-American world socialist… but perhaps that’s precisely the
point, given
the ideological backgrounds of so many of the neoconservatives there.
Yet, the AEI
remains, posing as an organization that advocates for freedom of
individuals rather than the state. It continues to shill for war,
global conquest, and to promote a kind of fantastic Washington mastery-of-the-planet
idea. The most recent case in point is this
week’s AEI policy panel entitled "The
War in the Caucasus."
Fred Kagan
spoke at length on the
Russian-Georgian conflict, with many PowerPoint slides. The
pudgy Ph.D. droned on and on, apparently boring not only myself,
but many in the AEI audience, some of whom appeared to be suppressing
yawns. Of course, this lethargy may be explained by the fact that
the audience consisted mostly of well over-fifty and similarly pudgy
white men. The few young people in the audience appeared not to
be paying close attention. Fred Kagan is insufferably boring.
Because Fred
was purporting to give a military style tactics and strategy briefing,
my mind wandered back to my military days. We liked well-organized,
concise, and accurate briefings. Where speculation was called for,
such speculation was presented with full disclosure, conservatively,
and constrained always, always, by known facts.
Did I mention
"concise?" What about "factual?" Good, I thought
so. Needless to say, what Fred (who, as the presentation proceeded,
increasingly reminded me of one of the pigs in Animal
Farm) communicated could have been better done by a 21-year-old
airman. Interspersed and interwoven between Kagan’s various "facts"
was Kagan’s ill-considered and pathetically transparent hopes for
larger war, and his narrowly contrived opinions about what the conflagration
in Georgia meant for the globe.
Perhaps I was
simply in a bad mood because Fred had three different pronunciations
for the city of Tbilisi, each of which he insisted upon giving equal
time. Egalitarianism and self-determination is justified for faulty
pronunciations, but sadly, not for South Ossetians or Abkhazians.
But I don’t
mean to pick on Fred. Next was former Army Lt. Col. and prolific
author Ralph Peters. Peters appeared to fully share Kagan’s ideas
of the grand significance of Russia’s invasion, and he was angered
by President Bush’s sissified reaction. Airlifting Georgians back
from supporting our own invasion of Iraq, a quickly deployed U.S.
military-humanitarian mission, and declaring our undying support
for that great democrat, Saakashvili? This was not nearly enough
for Ralph, who looked like an aging hippie in a suit. I met Peters
at NSA in the mid-1990s, and remember him as young, clean cut and
energetic. This week at AEI, his familiar stomping ground, he seemed
fuzzily hysterical, and almost frail as he panted for more war.
It goes without
saying that these effeminate men-children flock to play war, even
as they avoid real debate, real disagreement, and real combat. Intimidated
by a complex and uncontrollable world, they create in their own
minds an ordered controllable fantasy. Hence the tidy attraction
of socialism – but this ideological flirtation with super-centralized
control of human activity is normally overcome by education and
maturity – and for most moral people, ownership of perfection is
granted to a higher, immortal power. It is eerie to witness the
arrested intellectual and moral development on public display at
AEI. But more frightening is AEI’s institutional avoidance of reality
and justice, and its enthusiastic cultivation of what Hayek called
the
pretense of knowledge.
The strangest
aspect of the AEI panel was the fluidity of AEI’s pronouncements
on the wrongness of the Russian military action against the Georgian
state, its cities and population, AEI’s pointed criticism of Russia’s
economic motivations, and AEI’s repeated claims for the rights of
small states to be left alone, to rule themselves, to evolve. With
each high-minded criticism of Russia’s actions over the past few
weeks, I wondered why no one in the audience was physically wincing
at how accurately AEI’s criticism applied to our own cavalier destruction
of states, governments and cities, our own insistence on loyal puppet
governors (like Saakashvili himself, supported
by American taxpayer dollars, and Washington back-room dealings)
as we occupy Iraq, and manipulate the governments of Afghanistan
and Pakistan, and other countries around the world.
Our 20th-century
American habit, continued to the present day, is to send our military
halfway around the world to dominate and destroy small countries
with fourth-rate defenses. This not only doesn’t seem to embarrass
the great minds at AEI, it is embraced by them – except when a once
and future (and now very wealthy) enemy follows suit. Then, miraculously,
the language of freedom is summoned. That elsewhere these same intellectuals
can smoothly take the side of separatist Kurds, Shiites, Kosovars
and even Chechnyans – using the same exact language, belies the
real purpose and intent of AEI: to promote the neoconservative Washington
consensus – clothed in the language of freedom and democracy.
For
a good reading of Washington’s strategic interests in Georgia (and
these do NOT include democracy, self-determination, freedom or peace)
you are better off looking at
this paper from the Army War College. For wisdom that applies
today, we may actually find it in AEI. Jeane Kirkpatrick observed
in 1988 that, "Russia is playing chess, while we are playing
Monopoly. The only question is whether they will checkmate us before
we bankrupt them." Resident AEI scholar Leon Aron, on the panel
this week, wrote of Russia under Putin in 2006,
… [the Kremlin
decided to]…. reanimate
the role of the state, occupy "commanding heights" in economy
again, repossess the "jewels" in the "economy's crown," and put
the executive branch of the government above all the other branches,
permanently.
Kirkpatrick
and Aron, as with every topsy-turvy articulation from the AEI, have
it exactly right – except for orientation. American interest in
Georgia in the past decade is the result of neoconservative fear
that Russia will bankrupt America’s heavily indebted
and credit-dependent government. And rather than contemporary Russia
becoming less free, more economically centralized and tyrannical,
Aron’s projection more accurately reflects the United States today,
an ugly America that AEI promotes and nurtures.
August
15, 2008
LRC
columnist Karen Kwiatkowski, Ph.D. [send
her mail], a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, has written on
defense issues with a libertarian perspective for MilitaryWeek.com,
hosted the call-in radio show American
Forum, and blogs occasionally for Huffingtonpost.com
and Liberty and Power.
To receive automatic announcements of new articles, click
here.
Copyright ©
2008 Karen Kwiatkowski
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|