Tia
and Her Twelve Sisters
by
Karen Kwiatkowski
Iran-Contra
hero John Poindexter has risen like a phoenix from the Washington
wasteland. And as with Iran-Contra, Poindexter has made some tactical
errors in his new role as director of DARPA’s Total Information
Awareness program. That all-seeing
eye on the pyramid logo was a bad idea. So was sharing the biographies
of the TIA senior leadership. "Total" has now been replaced
by the more seemly "Terrorist."
Admiral
Poindexter found out that "total" information awareness
could harm people like himself and his friends in the bureaucracy,
and bring them unwanted scrutiny. Their privacy might be vulnerable
to violation.
John
actually runs the whole DARPA
Information Awareness Office. Terrorist
Information Awareness is just one of thirteen known IAO offspring.
Since
we’re paying, we might wonder what we are getting, other than consultants
who apparently told somebody about branding disasters, for example,
free-mason
symbology in the hands of John Poindexter, John Ashcroft or
even Dick Cheney and his friends. It works on the dollar, an honest
mistake, I’m sure.
Like
the glamorous Hilton twins and the outspoken Dixie Chicks, Tia and
her twelve sisters are stumbling into the spotlight. Maureen
Dowd pokes fun at the clumsy one, where the government tries
to find out who you are and what you’re going to do by how you walk.
This is eleven of the thirteen listed projects, officially known
as Human ID at a Distance, or HumanID
or just HID. They say the wearing of trenchcoats will foul this
technology, but of course the wearing of trenchcoats will identify
you as someone out to foul the technology, so….
The
baker’s dozen of lovelies includes FutureMAP, or "Futures Markets
Applied to Prediction." Libertarians will certainly favor Future
MAP because she seeks to understand how markets react so rapidly
to "knowledge held by only a few participants." Wow –
might I suggest von Hayek or Mises? "I,
Pencil" anyone? It would be less expensive and far more
effective, but then Poindexter couldn’t spend our money now and
justify more cash in the out-years because of program failures that
could be corrected if only he had more of our money.
If
HID is the clumsy sister, and FutureMAP is the pseudo-libertarian
sister, then Evidence Extraction and Link Discovery is the bitch.
EELD is one mean
sister, and she has staying power. Her mission in life, this fiscal
year alone, is to:
-
extend
its capabilities to the extraction of data from multiple sources
(e.g., text messages and web pages), with an ability to adapt
rapidly to new threat domains;
-
develop
the ability to detect instances of patterns comprising multiple
link types (e.g., financial transactions, communications, travel,
etc.); and,
-
will develop
the ability to learn patterns comprised of multiple types of
entities (e.g., persons, organizations, etc.) and multiple link
types.
This
language, as with all government language, is designed to soothe
and bore. I’m sure that if an innocent person, in researching an
article, visited web sites on occultist symbols, terrorism, technology,
the federal government, then posted an article with said links on
a public website with a high Alexa hit rating, and then other folks
emailed and blogged, including to and from overseas, about the dangers
of the TIA in the hands of the Bush league or any political appointee
to the pursuit of their life goals and politics, and perhaps
even used angry or seditionist words in their communications, this
would not be of interest to EELD. No, not at all. Not even for practice,
not even to demonstrate a capability. Naahh, never happen.
Poindexter’s
brood contains at least one ugly sister, but it is hard to choose
from between Effective, Affordable Speech to Text (EARS)
or Wargaming the Asymmetric Environment (WAE).
Babylon is perhaps
the batty one up in the attic, as a PDA device that translates the
"low-population, high-terrorist-risk languages" of Pashto,
Dari, Arabic, and Mandarin. Babylon might have use in a field environment,
where American soldiers need to tell foreign enemies to "be
quiet," "drop the gun" and "hands up."
But as a counterterror tool, this chick and some of her sisters
that focus on computerized translations clearly live in an alternate
universe.
Most
of the 9-11 terrorists, as well as all of our homegrown ones, used
English and could have been identified in advance without the slightest
bit of eavesdropping on their private foreign language conversations.
In fact, most past terrorists were already well-known to a number
of U.S. government agencies – with no help from an automatic phrase
translator. Heck, some of the Arabic speaking terrorists (the crowd
control toughs on the aircraft who thought it was a hi-jack) didn’t
even know the full terror plan – but the feds think if they could
get a computer to translate some phrases, they would? Mandarin,
Dari and Pashto were not primary languages of the 9-11 or any other
anti-American terrorists, but I guess in the Washingtonworld of
pre-planned imperial wars and unlimited and unaccountable government
spending, it’s better not to ask too many questions.
This
dysfunctional family includes BioALIRT
Bio-event Advanced Leading Indicator Recognition Technology,
code name BSS. BSS is also a bitch – and if EELD hasn’t already
alarmed the privacy cadre, BioALIRT will. But why should the average
American care if the government mines health databases to "track"
dangerous pathogens so that government at all levels can spend more
time "planning" the response? As with all emergency responses,
individual human actions and free market forces will meet the need
firstest with the mostest, while government agencies focus their
time and energy on restricting these forces as soon as they can
and writing up the press story to ensure we are all properly grateful
for the late federal aid or premature military invasion, as applicable.
Daddy’s
favorite, while not the most powerful, most productive, or the toughest,
is probably Translingual Information Detection, Extraction and Summarization
or TIDES. TIDES
is a little charmer, with her purpose of enabling English speakers
to "interpret critical information in multiple languages without
requiring knowledge of those languages."
Now,
this whole nutty bunch is alternatively scary and stupid, and TIDES
takes the cake. But little sister explains everything. Like Forrest
Gump, the least of us is often the source of the greatest insight.
The government, relentlessly expanding, consuming like cancerous
cells the healthy limbs and organs that ostensibly support it, finds
as it approaches metastasis that it must "interpret without
knowledge."
Even
the Association for Computing Machinery, the oldest professional
organization for information technology, has come out against
Tia and her sisters. True knowledge will never be found at the data
end of computer software. Understanding and predicting terrorism
and conflict is better done by honestly evaluating history, psychology,
and practical policy. We would go far towards preventing terroristic
violence by simply slashing the coercive capability of our own state.
But
if we had followed that path, we wouldn’t have been graced with
Iran-Contra, Washington wouldn’t need to pay back John Poindexter
for his previous service with a nice new DARPA job, we wouldn’t
have had the 9-11 terrorist attacks, or subsequent invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq. Can we even imagine life without those events?
That
we cannot adds up to one more crime by the 20th century
state against the rest of us. What crimes will the 21st
century state bring us? I can hardly wait.
May
26, 2003
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a recently retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final
four and a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now
lives with her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley.
Copyright
© 2003 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|