Desperately
Seeking Virtue in the Bush Administration
by Karen
Kwiatkowski
by Karen Kwiatkowski
What
are we to think about the White House Correspondents Dinner? It
occurred almost two weeks ago, but I am still not sure what it means.
Perhaps
we should have been prepared for Laura’s
standup comedy routine, after watching the similarly risqué
and sometimes unfunny performance of the Bush daughters at
the Republican Convention last summer.
In
an administration obscenely misshapen by hubris and hypocrisy, Laura
Bush had seemed to serve as a rare moral defense. She was a small,
steady light in an administration enamored of the easy lie and bloated
with lust for territory seasoned with the blood of good men and
women.
But
at the Correspondents Dinner, the "First Lady" enlightened
me, Bush’s conservative base and the world on how she and the other
"values" oriented women of the administration spend their
time in downtown D.C. after their decrepit better halves nod off.
I’d bet the Dollar Bill nickname for Lynne Cheney was fantasy and
the visit to Chippendales never happened.
Laura
joked about being a "Desperate Housewife," referring to
that deliciously modern Peyton Place on Sunday night television.
A little closer to truth, perhaps.
But
it was the milking the male horse joke that turned my stomach. The
language. The imagery. The disrespect to George – except wait –
George thought it was hilarious. If we needed any more proof that
George W. Bush was a
permanent emotional resident of a high school locker room, Laura
handed it over.
Laura
and her speechwriters seemed delighted to waste one more share of
that dwindling
Bush political capital from the 2004 election.
Afterwards,
very little media attention was paid to the embarrassing evening.
No raised eyebrows about Bush family raunchiness in light of its
loyal Christian right support base. No interviews with Jerry Falwell
and Pat Robertson, seeking to make sense of Laura Bush. No hard-hitting
questions about the physical and mental health of George W. Bush,
his persistent incoherence or even comparisons with last year’s
entertainment fiasco when Bush crudely joked about trying to find
WMDs as our young men died horrible deaths in Iraq.
In
the intervening two weeks, several news items emerged, all ignored
by the same White House Correspondents who applauded so heartily
for George and Laura.
-
A Bush-supporting
Baptist church in North Carolina decided to become "political."
Its first act – Stalinesque by any standard – was a purge
of those suspected of disloyalty to Bush, followed by a broader
purge of those who opposed the idea of political churches.
The
threat of IRS investigation of the church’s tax-exempt status
calmed the storm and the good Reverend Chan Chandler resigned.
-
Larry
Franklin of the Office for Special Plans was
finally arrested by the FBI. Was he arrested for his own
protection because he was cooperating with the FBI, or was
he not cooperating after all? Is he the fall guy for his boss,
Bill Luti, now Special Assistant to the President at the National
Security Council, and the soon to retire Doug Feith, or even
Paul Wolfowitz and Don Rumsfeld? Did the people paying for
expensive Plato
Cacheris pull the account? What was the real role of the
Israeli government in promulgating lies to bring us to Iraq,
permanently, it seems? It would be a great story, if it could
be told.
-
Capping
it off in the past two weeks was the release of British documents
that show that the U.S. decision to go to war in Iraq was
made long before permission was requested of the U.S. Congress,
or the American people, and without any moral or legal justification,
beyond Bush and the neocons saying "I wanna." The
present administration made a steady and effective effort
to create false "facts" for public consumption beginning
in early 2002. It’s what I saw in the Pentagon myself,
and shared
with you, but I always hoped it was an aberration or a
mistake. It wasn’t.
The
neoconservative movement emphasizes militaristic internationalism
abroad, in regions of finely defined Washington interest, while
waving the flags of cultural conservatism and social democracy at
home. Its evangelical call for the export of American values and
governing styles, as well as its appearance of support for the "good
old days" strikes a chord in some parts of the Christian community.
Co-opting
Christian traditions for political ends shows American neoconservatism
at its most criminally fraudulent. Christianity emphasizes personal
accountability, humility and modesty. Christians model themselves
on Jesus’ example, which importantly included obedience to God,
even when that meant dangerous disobedience to earthly kings and
counselors.
Instead,
we have a robust and growing
monstrosity of a centralized state at home and an amoral and
deadly foreign policy abroad, both cheered and defended by America’s
Christian religious fundamentalists.
Laura
Bush and her jokes, like George W. Bush’s repeated exploitation
of his Christian base at election-time, reveal the sheer contempt
with which the administration holds the traditional values crowd.
We
need to wake up. Christians know better than to be seduced by talking
snakes and promises of grandeur and world dominance. Of all people,
they should be leading the way in undeniable and unshakeable opposition
to our current Caesar.
May
12, 2005
Karen
Kwiatkowski [send her mail]
is a retired USAF lieutenant colonel, who spent her final four and
a half years in uniform working at the Pentagon. She now lives with
her freedom-loving family in the Shenandoah Valley, and writes a
bi-weekly column on defense issues with a libertarian perspective
for militaryweek.com.
Copyright ©
2005 LewRockwell.com
Karen
Kwiatkowski Archives
|