Public Indoctrination
by
Gail Jarvis
by
Gail Jarvis
DIGG THIS
Dr. Ron Paul’s
contention that the U.S. Department of Education (ED) should be
eliminated has raised eyebrows. The networks’ talking heads along
with many average citizens simply cannot conceive of how children
can be educated without the assistance of the U.S. Department of
Education. The idea that we could survive without ED is dismissed
as ludicrous.
Many of the
same objections made against Dr. Paul’s criticisms of ED have been
made against homeschooling. The National Education Association (NEA)
has vociferously criticized home schooling. Indeed, one member of
NEA angrily referred to home schooling as "child abuse."
But most parents who choose to home school do so based on what they
have learned about public schools; primarily from their own children.
Their conclusion is that public schools indoctrinate rather than
educate.
Indoctrination
and behavior modification in public schools are the result of the
policies of the Department of Education and the influence of the
National Education Association. Many in academia approve of these
policies and vigorously defend public education. They maintain that
indoctrination is not taking place in public schools. Instead, they
claim that today’s educators are simply viewing history and other
subjects from a new and enlightened perspective.
Is it "indoctrination"
or an "enlightened perspective" that is attempting to
shape the opinions of today’s youth? Your answer may depend on your
political persuasion. But you can decide for yourself by reviewing
the results of a recent study conducted on high school students:
2000 juniors and seniors from all 50 states. The study was reported
in the February 5th edition of USA Today and the results
of the study are scheduled to appear in the March issue of The
Journal of American History.
Students were
instructed to list the most famous Americans in history from the
time of Columbus up to the current year. The only restriction placed
on them was that presidents and first ladies could not be named.
From the time of Columbus (1492) to the year 2008 covers a wide
range of persons to choose from. During those centuries, there were
countless exceptional Americans.
Below is the
published summary of the students’ lists of the "top 10"
most famous Americans in history, ranked in order on their importance,
with the percentage of students who chose each person:
- Martin
Luther King, Jr.: 67%
- Rosa Parks:
60%
- Harriet
Taubman: 44%
- Susan B.
Anthony: 34%
- Benjamin
Franklin: 29%
- Amelia
Earhart: 25%
- Oprah Winfrey:
22%
- Marilyn
Monroe: 19%
- Thomas
Edison: 18%
- Albert
Einstein: 16%
I was a bowled
over when I first saw this list but I shouldn’t have been surprised.
It is another illustration of the ongoing revisionist accounts of
history. It is significant to note how pop-culture influenced this
list. Based on the students’ choices, it appears that public schools
not only indoctrinate students but also dumb-down the learning material
presented in classes.
But
many of us, along with Dr. Paul and homeschoolers, profoundly object
to this manipulation of our youth. This is another illustration
that when the central government has a monopoly on public education,
fair and balanced presentations of history suffer. What results
are listless programmed minds of malleable young students conditioned
to accommodate the state’s goals.
February
13, 2008
Gail
Jarvis [send
him mail] is a free-lance writer.
Copyright
© 2008 LewRockwell.com
Gail
Jarvis Archives
|