The U.S. Invasion of the Vatican
by
Jacob G. Hornberger
by Jacob G. Hornberger
Recently
by Jacob G. Hornberger: Foreign-Policy
Blowback at Ft. Hood
Suppose President
Obama expressed disapproval with the Vaticans method of electing
the Pope. Its not democratic enough, the president says. Why
should a small group of Catholic cardinals be the only voters? Why
shouldnt all Catholics get to vote for the Pope? Isnt
that what democracy is all about?
Obama demands
that the Vatican open the vote to all Catholics. The Vatican responds
that its method of electing the Pope is none of the U.S. governments
business. Butt out, the Pope tells Obama.
Obama orders
a U.S. invasion of Vatican City, with the express aim of spreading
democracy to that part of the world. The troops are ordered to mobilize
and prepare for the invasion.
The Vatican
condemns the coming war of aggression, pointing out that it violates
the UN Charter and the principles set forth at Nuremberg. He also
points out that such an invasion would violate the U.S. Constitution
since the president has failed to secure the constitutionally required
congressional declaration of war against the Vatican. Most important
of all, the Pope points out that the killing of Vatican citizens
by U.S. soldiers will constitute grave, mortal sins under Gods
laws.
The president
is not dissuaded. He orders the troops to undertake the invasion,
reminding them that people everywhere, especially Catholics, will
be grateful for their efforts to spread democracy.
For his part,
the Pope orders all citizens of Vatican City, including bishops,
priests, and nuns to take up arms to defend against the U.S. invasion.
How would Catholic
soldiers react? Would they suffer a crisis of conscience or at least
a bit of discomfort over the prospect of having to kill other Catholics,
including bishops, priests, nuns, and possibly even the Pope?
Well, it really
wouldnt matter how they would react. Under U.S. military dictates,
Catholic soldiers would be expected to follow orders and do their
duty. Conscientious-objector status would be out of the question,
since the military does not recognize such a status on a war-by-war
basis. Soldiers would be counseled by military chaplains, including
Catholic priests, that they could in good conscience trust the judgment
of their commander in chief. God would understand and approve, the
chaplains would tell their men. America is an exceptional nation.
The invasion
begins. Interventionists announce that the time for debate is over
and that all patriots must now come together and rally to the flag.
Support the troops stickers immediately appear on peoples
cars. Church ministers all across the land exhort their parishioners
to pray for the troops, especially those in harms way and
defending our freedoms. American flags are prominently posted in
church altars.
After thousands
of deaths and injuries, the U.S. government prevails in the conflict,
and Americans celebrate the victory. Democracy is brought to the
Vatican. Catholics everywhere now get to vote for the Pope. To ensure
that democracy remains, U.S. troops continue to occupy the country,
periodically killing insurgent bishops, priests, and nuns who continue
to resist the occupation. Obama is hailed as an historic democracy-spreader
and is nominated to receive another Nobel Peace Prize.
Meanwhile,
American soldiers, especially the Catholic ones, are returning home
all screwed up in the head, beating their wives and children, committing
murder and suicide, and engaging in other forms of aberrant behavior.
Most everyone attributes it to the stress of combat. Hardly anyone
considers the possibility that the soldiers might be struggling
with having chosen to surrender their consciences by following military
orders that violated the laws of God.
November
12, 2009
Jacob
Hornberger [send him mail]
is founder and president of The Future
of Freedom Foundation.
Copyright
© 2009 Future of Freedom Foundation
Jacob
Hornberger Archives
|