'Our' Collective Goodness in the Tsunami Disaster
by
Jacob G. Hornberger
by Jacob G. Hornberger
Stung
by the suggestion that we (please note the quotation
marks) are
stingy because we (quotation marks again) were sending
only $15 million to the tsunami victims, U.S. Secretary of State
Colin Powell immediately upped the ante with another $20 million
in U.S. government assistance. Powell also made it clear that this
is just the beginning and that we will ultimately send
billions
of dollars to the victims. Extolling our generosity,
Powell vowed, We will do more.
So,
with one quick announcement by our secretary of state,
our generosity more than doubled overnight. And by vowing
to send billions more in government aid to the troubled region,
Powell ensured our collective goodness for the near
future.
But
lets be clear about the nature of our goodness,
our compassion, our caring nature.
In
the 20th century, we embraced a collectivized system
in which we nationalized everyones income and
then made the government our agent for our
goodness, compassion, and caring. The system that we
adopted functions like this:
We
authorize the Congress that we elect to take any portion
of our income it wants, as long as the percentage is
set in a democratic (i.e., majority-vote) fashion. Once that portion
or percentage is democratically set, the Internal Revenue Service
is authorized to use force to collect the assigned take from everyone.
The IRS then delivers the take to other government agencies, which
then distribute the take to the poor and needy of the world. Voila!
We are caring, compassionate, and good
well,
as long as our government officials and agencies are
caring, compassionate, and good. If they are stingy,
then we are stingy.
Thats
in fact the underlying collectivized moral basis for
the entire welfare-warfare system that we brought into
existence in the 20th century. Thats why we are
good in Iraq because the IRS delivered a portion of the take
to the Pentagon, which then used the money to invade Iraq to bring
democracy and liberation to the Iraqi people, all on
the orders of the president, who is of course democratically elected
by us. Voila! Through the collective, joint efforts
of the IRS and the Pentagon (well, and the Treasury Department and
the Federal Reserve also) and the president, we are
good people for what we are doing in Iraq.
For
that matter, lets not forget Social Security. We
are a good people because we elected a Congress that
enacted Social Security, which authorizes the IRS to take a portion
of our income to help the elderly. That makes us
good people.
What
about our American ancestors? You know, those Americans who for
more than 100 years rejected income taxation, Social Security, welfare,
foreign aid, and foreign wars of democracy and liberation.
You know, our ancestors who believed that freedom entailed a persons
keeping everything he earns and having the right to decide what
to do with it without government interference spend, donate,
invest, hoard, or whatever. You know, our ancestors who had the
right to accumulate unlimited amounts of wealth and, without being
forced to care for others, brought into existence the most charitable
society in history. You know, our ancestors who believed that charity,
compassion, and caring meant nothing unless it came from the voluntary
heart of an individual, as compared to the collectivized force of
majority vote.
Oh,
theyre the robber barons, the selfish ones, the
ones who hated the poor. Theyre the ones who hated and abused
their children, forcing them to fend for themselves for endless
hours in dangerous sweatshops. For more information about them and
their evil system of freedom and rugged individualism,
just read about them in any government-approved textbook in any
government-approved school to which we force U.S. parents
to send their children.
December
30, 2004
Jacob
Hornberger [send him mail]
is founder and president of The Future
of Freedom Foundation.
Copyright
© 2004 Future of Freedom Foundation
Jacob
Hornberger Archives
|