Instead
of Stimulus, Do Nothing – Seriously
by
Robert Higgs
by Robert Higgs
As we wait
to see how the politicians in Washington will alter the stimulus
package the Obama administration is pushing, many questions are
being raised about the measure's contents and efficacy. Should it
include money for the National Endowment for the Arts, Amtrak, and
child care? Is it big enough to get the economy moving again? Does
it spend money fast enough? Hardly anyone, however, is asking the
most important question: Should the federal government be doing
any of this?
In
raising this question, one risks immediate dismissal as someone
hopelessly out of touch with the modern realities of economics and
government. Yet the United States managed to navigate the first
century and a half of its past a time of phenomenal growth
without any substantial federal intervention to moderate
economic booms and busts. Indeed, when the government did intervene
actively, under Herbert Hoover and Franklin D. Roosevelt, the result
was the Great Depression.
Until the 1930s,
the Constitution served as a major constraint on federal economic
interventionism. The government's powers were understood to be just
as the framers intended: few and explicitly enumerated in our founding
document and its amendments. Search the Constitution as long as
you like, and you will find no specific authority conveyed for the
government to spend money on global-warming research, urban mass
transit, food stamps, unemployment insurance, Medicaid, or countless
other items in the stimulus package and, even without it, in the
regular federal budget.
This Constitutional
constraint still operated as late as the 1930s, when federal courts
issued some 1,600 injunctions to restrain officials from carrying
out acts of Congress, and the Supreme Court overturned the New Deal's
centerpieces, the National Industrial Recovery Act and the Agricultural
Adjustment Act, and other statutes. This judicial action outraged
President Roosevelt, who fumed that "we have been relegated
to the horse-and-buggy definition of interstate commerce."
Early in 1937, he responded with his court-packing plan.
Read
the rest of the article
February
10, 2009
Robert
Higgs [send him mail] is
senior fellow in political economy at the Independent
Institute and editor of The
Independent Review. He
is also a columnist for LewRockwell.com. His
most recent book is Neither
Liberty Nor Safety: Fear, Ideology, and the Growth of Government.
He is also the author of Depression,
War, and Cold War: Studies in Political Economy, Resurgence
of the Warfare State: The Crisis Since 9/11 and Against
Leviathan: Government Power and a Free Society.
Copyright
© 2009 Robert Higgs
Robert
Higgs Archives
|