The Good News: It's Not About Race
by
William Norman Grigg
by William Norman Grigg
DIGG THIS
"You know what
I like here? There's a bunch of black guys waiting in cars to shoot
it up with a bunch of white guys, and it's not about race."
Leave it to
Spenser, the irrepressibly sarcastic Private Eye from Robert
Parker's durable series of detective novels, to find the ironic
humor in a potentially lethal situation.
"Be about power
and money, mostly," agreed Spenser's fearsome ally, Hawk, employing
the economical street patois he employed while on the job (and abandoned,
when it suited him, when he found himself in refined company).
In this instance,
as described near the climax of the
2005 novel Cold Service, the duo was quietly preparing
for the first volley in a multi-ethnic gang war in a Massachusetts
village called Marshport, the government of which was run by a Ukrainian
crime ring controlled by the Mayor-cum-mob capo Boots Podolak.
Hawk's motive
was revenge: He had nearly been killed in the ambush arranged by
Podolak's men, an attack that claimed the life of a man Hawk was
supposed to protect. Spenser's motive was primarily loyalty to his
friend and comrade from many previous campaigns.
Some of those
who assembled for battle did it for purely mercenary reasons, working
as subcontractors for Spenser. Others were simply in pursuit of
what most people in such conflicts seek: Control over turf, and
the apparatus necessary to exploit it through the creative use of
duress. To obtain it, Podolak and his clique had to be removed.
In all of this,
as Hawk pointed out, power and money played a much greater role
than any atavistic attachment to ethnic or tribal loyalties.
As
the USA careens toward bankruptcy and, perhaps – hopefully –
some variety of schism, I find myself taking ironic consolation
in the fact that the conflict won't be defined by racial or ethnic
divisions, despite the best efforts of our rulers to cattle-pen
us into such categories.
Granted, this
could change very easily. Madame Obama could change her name to
Winnie
and start hanging around with a
murderous "football club." The
Holy One Himself (peace be upon him) comes under armed attack
by some disposable dimwit with a conveniently conspicuous paper
trail through Klan and neo-Nazi groups and a jones for The
Catcher in the Rye.
But there's
ample reason to believe that the Obamas – despite their successful
shared career in racial shakedown politics and their cynical use
of race to make themselves a marketable brand – aren't interested
in pursuing identity politics.
To judge from
the composition of the Obama transition team, the Exalted Apostle
of Change (we pause to tug on our forelock) is interested in little
more than the standard politics of corporatist plunder. Obama's
signature touch is to transpose that agenda into the key of cultural
Marxism, as opposed to the pious militarism that remains in favor
with what remains of the Republican Party.
For
Obama, the collapse of our financial system was a politically fortuitous
event. For reasons that defy rational understanding, the public
perceives Obama as a transcendent figure who can cast his gaze upon
the turbid markets and command them, "Peace – be still."
The fact that
the markets have reacted to Obama's election with something less
than confident relief has yet to register with the True Believers,
who likewise remain untroubled by the fact that those whom The One
has gathered as his inner circle of disciples
include many of the architects of our ever-deepening financial catastrophe.
Rahm Emmanuel,
the
issue of terrorist loins and one-time servant of an obnoxious foreign
power chosen to be Obama's Chief of Staff, made a cool $200
K in 2001 through a
sinecure at Freddie Mac; this happened at a time when that government-sponsored
entity (GSE) was one of the chief engines inflating the Housing
Bubble. Three of Obama's key economic advisers – Anne Mulcahy, Richard
Parsons, and William Daley – enjoyed similar posts at Fannie Mae.
Clinton-era
Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, another prominent figure in the
Obama transition team, was a master chef at cooking the books on
behalf of Citigroup and a consulting gourmet for Enron when that
company's degenerate corporate elite was looking for just the right
recipe to use in swindling its shareholders. And more
than a third of the spots on Obama's transition team – which
is a farm club for both ambassadorships and more consequential executive
branch posts – are the most successful "bundlers" of corporate donations
to His Holiness's campaign.
Already assuming
the mien of a dictator before formally inheriting the mantle of
dictatorship, Obama, asserting the suppositious authority of the
non-existent "office" of president-elect (a status he won't actually
enjoy until after the Electoral College meets next month), Obama
"is pushing Congress this year to approve as much as $50 billion
to save cash starved U.S. automakers and appoint a czar or board
to oversee the companies," according
to a Bloomberg report.
This proposed
nationalization of the auto industry, which has the support of the
Wee Emperor, has been urged upon Obama by two of his key advisers,
former Federal Reserve commissar Paul Volcker and former Treasury
Secretary Lawrence Summers – two veterans of the entrenched Establishment
Obama supposedly seeks to de-throne.
In defining
how Obama will rule, his practical connections to the entrenched
corporate socialist oligarchy are much more important than his cultural
Marxist background. There is little danger of Obama instigating
a proletarian revolution; as
John Derbyshire wryly pointed out, Obama can't incite a worker
revolt to seize control over the means of production, since all
of our factories have already moved to China.
Besides, what's
the point of staging a revolution from below to consolidate power
in the state, when the Bush administration has already done all
of the heavy lifting? The most tangible accomplishment of a generation
of Republican rule is the creation of an apparatus of regimentation
and wealth redistribution that Lenin would have coveted.
There is not
a particle of hyperbole in that statement. Witness the observation
offered by Jeb Mason, the Treasury Department's liaison to corporate
lobbyists seeking a portion of the $700 billion in "bailout" boodle.
Under siege by supplicants, Mason, a 32-year-old GOP apparatchik
who served under the feculent
Karl Rove, commented
to a friend: "This must have been how the Politburo felt."
As I've noted
before, the mechanism of wealth redistribution from the middle and
working classes into the hands of corporate parasites is now fully
autonomous: With the Treasury Secretary and the Fed Chairman able
to create "money" in any volume they please, and disburse it as
they see fit, with no oversight or accountability, Congress
really doesn't have a role – other than that of misdirecting
the public.
Those
actually in charge of looting the country before its collapse –
whether
in the commanding heights, like Comrade Bernanke and Herr Paulson,
or in the trenches, like K-Street Pimp Jeb Mason or the Wall Street
bagman bearing the deliciously Dickensian name Neel
Kashkari – are entirely unaccountable. From their perspective,
the uninitiated have no right so much as to know how much is being
spent, let alone for what, and for whose benefit, the sums are being
spent.
The $700 billion
that raised the public's ire and attracted the attention of corporate
lobbyists is merely a small bucket drawn from the immense pool of
"liquidity" flowing from the Fed. The
ruling economic Triumvirate has actually taken on $5 trillion in
liabilities since the financial collapse began last March, and
I would be surprised if that figure didn't at least double before
Obama, sitting astride his magic unicorn, stages his triumphal entry
into the Imperial Capital next January.
Once again,
as Hawk might put it, all of this "be about power and money, mostly,"
even though the racial aspect of Obama's impending advent is quite
useful to the Power Elite that created his campaign, and are eager
to exploit him as a human shield.
When The One
acts as a conduit for policies created by the same gang of parasites
that have ruled our nation for decades, every criticism will be
cynically supplied with a spurious racial subtext. This tactic will
inspire critics on the left to stifle themselves. It could eventually
be used to imprison critics on the right.
November
14, 2008
William
Norman Grigg [send him mail]
writes the Pro Libertate
blog.
Copyright
© 2008 William Norman Grigg
William
Norman Grigg Archives
|