Why
Does the Public Put Up With Abusive Cops?
by
Steven Greenhut
by Steven Greenhut
My
latest article on LewRockwell.com was anything but kind to the
armed bureaucrats who claim to be the protectors of safety, yet
to my surprise I received only one moderately critical response.
Almost every emailer – and there were plenty – added their own stories
about how police officers abuse their powers and fail to make us
safer.
Here was my favorite response: "Why is it after spending 32
years as a California Peace Officer (28 with the California Highway
Patrol) that I cannot find fault with your article. ... Let me add
tip #11: Never tell the public that 11% of the on duty killings
by police qualify as wrongful deaths; while only 2% of killings
by the uninformed, ill trained, dangerous public are so."
Clearly, we’re on to something here.
The day my article was published, the local news was consumed by
reports about a California Highway Patrol officer who was gunned-down
while on duty. The suspect is a 16-year-old-kid who, allegedly,
wanted to impress members of the gang he wanted to join.
Within hours, the suspect was apprehended, and the news reports
were filled with talk about police protecting their own. A "conservative"
drive-time talk-show host kept emphasizing how much more tragic
this killing was than other killings, because the victim was one
of those brave souls who put his life on the line protecting us.
The crime was terrible, no doubt. But why do police respond so overwhelmingly
when one of their own is killed? I can’t recall a manhunt of similar
proportions taking place when a mere citizen is gunned down in broad
daylight. I don’t know why the death of an officer in the line of
duty is so much more egregious than the murder of anyone else.
This just reinforces the "us vs. them" mentality of those
who carry the weapons and order us around.
The truth about police bullying, and police failure to care about
the people they are supposed to protect, came through in a Los
Angeles Times article on Tuesday. California Highway Patrol
received a call at 8:38 am on April 4 reporting a car going off
the road at a specific location along a freeway. Here’s the Times
account:
"Three
minutes later, the Riverside County Fire Department dispatched
two trucks that drove both sides of the freeway but found nothing.
A California Highway Patrol officer soon joined the search, stopping
briefly to look over the side of the road. Both searches lasted
less than 15 minutes.
"In
a ravine hidden from view 150 feet below the roaring traffic,
Norma Bustamante lay dying, her 5-year-old daughter, Ruby, nestled
close by. The little girl would survive nine days on her own...."
Now compare the lackluster police response to that case to the response
to the officer who was gunned down, where hundreds of officers scoured
the city. When a fellow cop is involved, no effort is spared. When
a mere citizen is lying there dying, a search doesn’t consist of
more than a perfunctory 15 minute gaze along the side of the road.
According to published reports, Bustamante’s family said that police
told them to hire their own searchers because they didn’t have the
time or budget for a search.
Oh, yes, thank God for these great protectors of us all. What would
we do without them?
Here’s a story from The Associated Press, as referred to by Bob
Wallace on his LRC blog post on Monday:
"The
city of Portland has agreed to pay $145,000 to an elderly blind
woman after police pepper-sprayed and shocked her with a stun
gun."
Who even needs to read further into the story than that? Wallace’s
headline was right on target: "How Do You Parody This?"
It reminded me of a scene a few years ago when Anaheim police drove
a mini-tank, accompanied by SWAT team members with military-style
rifles, into a quiet suburban neighborhood to arrest an elderly
doctor who was in no way threatening.
My wife, this week, was outraged after watching a TV news show that
included a segment on police who handcuffed and harassed a man who
was trying to get his pregnant wife to the hospital. The cops said
the agitated man had threatened them because of his angry words.
I sure can’t figure out why the guy was agitated, can you?
The guy’s response: How threatening can a man in a bathrobe and
slippers be?
If only the guy in the bathrobe were a fellow cop, he would have
gotten a police escort to the hospital.
My point: We all know that police frequently abuse their power,
and that they almost always treat the citizenry with disdain. We
know they take care of their own, but don’t do all that much to
protect the rest of us. We know they use excessive force all the
time, and have little concern about citizens, and use little common
sense in dealing with people who are upset or agitated. We know
police unions are bankrupting treasuries with their endless demands
for higher salaries and better benefits.
As the email above shows, cops know the game, too. So why are most
people so unwilling to admit that we know what’s going on? Why do
city councils refuse to hold local police departments accountable?
Why aren’t there protests against police misbehavior and abuse?
Good
questions. I’m still searching for the answers.
April
28, 2004
Steven
Greenhut (send him mail)
is a senior editorial writer and columnist for the Orange County
Register.
Copyright
© 2004 LewRockwell.com
Steven
Greenhut Archives
|