Fed-ACORN
Criminality
by
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
Recently
by Thomas DiLorenzo: Single-Payer
Groceries, Anyone?
ACORN (Association
of Community Organizations for Reform Now) is once again in the
news, with some of its "tax counselors" being videotaped
giving advice on tax evasion to two people posing as a pimp and
a hooker and looking for a government-subsidized loan for a brothel.
The two imposters also told the ACORN "counselors" that
they intended to bring dozens of teenage girls into the country
illegally from Central America to "work" in the brothel.
On the videotape the counselors happily advised them on how to go
about doing this without the legal authorities finding out about
it. They seemed quite knowledgeable and experienced in such matters.
The organization
is also being investigated by government authorities for allegedly
perpetrating vote fraud, among other possible crimes. (Recall that
ACORN is the organization that Barack Obama attached himself to
after earning his Harvard law degree. During the presidential campaign
his main claim to having the experience that would qualify him to
be president was his "community organizing" experience
while working for ACORN).
ACORN may
be found guilty of the relatively petty crimes it is now being accused
of, but there is a much larger issue that is being ignored. Over
the past thirty years or so, ACORN has been a major player in what
can be described as a legalized extortion racket administered by
the Federal Reserve and the Comptroller of the Currency, among other
federal government agencies. The racket started with Jimmy Carter’s
1977 Community Reinvestment Act (CRA), which empowered "community
groups" like ACORN to effectively extort billions (yes, billions
with a "b") of dollars from banks. Much of the money is
then used for ACORN’s political activities, which involve the mass
registration of Democratic Party voters; supporting left-wing political
candidates at all levels of government; organizing rallies, protests,
and lobbying efforts for various planks of its "People’s Platform,"
which is essentially the same as the Socialist Party Platform of
1922. The "People’s Platform" once promised, "We
will continue our fight until the American way is just one way,
until we have shared the wealth . . ." Accordingly, the organization
has advocated the government takeover of the energy and healthcare
industries, punishing taxation, massive income redistribution, pervasive
price controls, and just about every asinine socialistic policy
that one can think of.
The Federal
Reserve Board has been ACORN’s "partner" in this endeavor
ever since 1977, when the Fed was given responsibility (along with
the Comptroller of the Currency) for enforcing the CRA. For those
who are not yet familiar with the CRA, which was significantly strengthened
during the Clinton administration, it works like this: The ostensible
purpose of the Act is to get banks to make more mortgage loans in
"minority and low-income" neighborhoods. These loans have
been defined by the government as "sub-prime" loans, implying
that the borrowers have credit ratings just a tiny, tiny smidgen
below the "prime" or highest-credit-rating borrowers.
This of course is a farce, as nearly everyone now knows. The Fed
keeps track of such loans, and gives each lender a CRA ranking.
A poor ranking can destroy a bank’s plans for branch expansions,
mergers, and other activities.
So-called "community
groups" like ACORN, which is one of the biggest, are empowered
by the law to "protest" proposed bank expansions or mergers.
This is the main "business" that ACORN has been in for
the past thirty years. They file a protest with the Fed, while demanding
that the bank that is proposing the expansion or merger give it
– ACORN – millions or sometimes billions of dollars, to be
lent to sub-prime borrowers by ACORN, which keeps for itself some
of the loot. (WaMu bank, which is now defunct, once boasted of having
made $375 billion in CRA loans; the Fed gave Countrywide
Bank an award after it made $600 billion in such loans. It,
too, was bankrupted by the loans.)
The
CRA itself is based on a falsehood – that banks will systematically
walk away from billions of dollars in profits that are just waiting
to be picked up by someone in low-income and minority-dominated
neighborhoods. This argument is made by the same ACORN-style socialists
(like Barack Obama) who argue that bankers are greedy, money-grubbing
capitalist pigs. In reality, business people do not have to be forced
by the Fed to make money. The fact that force or the threat of force
is used by the Fed and its ACORN allies is proof that the loans
that are being made are bad loans to unqualified borrowers. During
the Fed-induced housing bubble, thousands of CRA sub-prime loans
for $300,000–$400,000 houses were made to high school dropouts on
welfare or in jobs paying barely more than minimum wage. The Fed
– and many other agencies of the federal government – was essentially
telling these low-income and minority borrowers the following: "Yes,
traditionally, people who own homes do so by working at a job, sticking
with it, saving their money, and avoiding excessively extravagant
spending on cars, vacations, etc., until they can afford a home.
Forget about that! The hell with financial responsibility! We will
fix things for you so that you can be fiscally irresponsible and
get a home. And the housing bubble inflation we have created
will even potentially make you rich! This way, we will share the
wealth! Just like the ACORN People’s Platform says!"
When
Forbes magazine columnists Peter Brimelow and Leslie Spencer
interrogated Boston Fed official Alicia Munnell about the Fed’s
claims of systemic lending discrimination in the early 1990s, Munnell
was forced to admit that she had no evidence of it. She and other
Fed officials (and the Clinton administration) continued to step
up CRA enforcement anyway. This suggests that the goal has always
been a forced redistribution of wealth through Fed banking regulation.
Charges of systemic discrimination have been used as a ruse to intimidate
any un-cooperating mortgage lenders (Not that stupid and self-destructive
bankers who discriminate on the basis of race do not exist.)
In order to
avoid having their business plans voided by the Fed, or being prosecuted
for housing discrimination, mortgage lenders are forced to participate
in what is essentially a legalized extortion racket. But then again,
what is government but just another criminal gang? (As Murray Rothbard
used to say.)
September
17, 2009
Thomas
J. DiLorenzo [send him mail]
is professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the
author of The
Real Lincoln; Lincoln
Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe
and How
Capitalism Saved America. His latest book is Hamilton’s
Curse: How Jefferson’s Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution
– And What It Means for America Today.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
The
Best of Thomas DiLorenzo at LRC
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at Mises.org
|