The
Rush Towards Socialism – and How To Stop It
by
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
It
only took the Obama administration a couple of weeks to prove that
the national leadership of the Democratic Party is guided by totalitarian-minded
socialists who seek to create an omnipotent government. The U.S.
government is now controlled by people who have been dreaming of
living out their utopian socialist fantasies ever since the fantasies
were brought to their attention in college decades ago by their
Mao/Castro/Che Guevara poster-hanging, capitalism-hating, communistic
professors.
The administration’s
main agenda is an explosion of federal spending and debt so large
and outrageous that America will soon exceed Sweden in the proportion
of the economy that is controlled by government – if it hasn’t already.
That’s just for starters. They also want to sharply increase taxes
on the most productive and hardest-working people in society; increase
the capital gains tax to deter private investment; expand the welfare
state; spend trillions on pure, pork barrel spending in a massive
vote-buying spree; set all corporate compensation levels by governmental
fiat; tax away the wealth of unpopular business people (only starting
with those AIG executives); regulate and control all risk taking
by private entrepreneurs; enforce a civilian draft to create a modern-day,
American version of the Hitler Youth (See Rahm Emanuel’s creepy,
Stalinist-sounding book entitled The
Plan); nationalize entire industries, starting with the
capital markets (they understand that there can be no capitalism
without private capital markets); and double, triple, and quadruple
the number of "regulators" who already regulate all aspects
of human life in America.
At the recent
G-20 meeting Obama even signed off on the creation of an international
regulatory "authority" that could set compensation
policies in American corporations. On top of this, there
is a never-ending drumbeat of anti-capitalist propaganda coming
from the administration and its worshipful mouthpieces in the "mainstream
media."
What can
be done? How can this rush toward totalitarian socialism be stopped?
Will the Republicans find another old, angry geezer to appeal to
the angry white male vote? How about another mumbling and incompetent
Bush family heir? Will there be another Reagan who will talk libertarian
while governing more like a European Social Democrat? Will they
trot out another old "war hero" who will plunge us into
war with Iran, North Korea, China, or whomever, to divert our attention
away from the economic mess government has placed us in? These are
the likely alternatives if we cling to the fantasy that "throwing
the bums out" at election time leads to something other than
another group of slightly different bums.
The fact
is that the American people have been servants or slaves to their
government for generations. It wasn’t always that way. When the
Adams administration enforced the Sedition Act that made criticism
of the federal government illegal, Jefferson and Madison responded
with the Virginia and Kentucky Resolves of 1798 that clearly stated
that the people did not intend to allow the enforcement of this
unconstitutional law within those two states. Section One of Jefferson’s
Kentucky Resolve stated, for example, that "the several States
composing the United States of America, are not united on the principles
of unlimited submission to their General Government . . ."
Other states supported Jefferson and Madison in their defense of
free speech.
When President
Thomas Jefferson imposed a national trade embargo and consummated
the Louisiana Purchase, New Englanders, led by George Washington’s
Secretary of State, Timothy Pickering, loudly threatened to secede.
They decided against it (for practical economic and political reasons)
at the Hartford Secession Convention of 1814, but their actions
sent a clear message to national politicians.
Outraged by
the embargo, the Massachusetts legislature used the language of
Jefferson’s own Kentucky Resolve to proclaim that the embargo "was
not legally binding on the citizens of the state" while denouncing
the federal law as "unjust, oppressive, and unconstitutional"
and reminding President Jefferson that "this state maintains
its sovereignty and independence . . ." All the New England
states, plus Delaware, did the exact same thing and nullified the
embargo.
When Alexander
Hamilton’s Bank of the United States, a precursor to the Fed, created
72 percent inflation in the first five years of its existence and
corrupted politics with its politicized spending policies, citizens
all over the country assisted President Andrew Jackson in eventually
destroying the institution. The heroic Ohio legislature slapped
a $50,000/year tax on each branch of the BUS, attempting to drive
it out of business. "The states have an equal right to interpret
the Constitution for themselves," announced the Ohio legislature,
and it decided that the BUS was not constitutional. Kentucky, Tennessee,
Connecticut, South Carolina, New York, and New Hampshire followed
suit.
When the
War of 1812 broke out the New England states effectively seceded
from the union by refusing to participate. A proclamation by the
Connecticut legislature was representative of the opinions of New
Englanders: "[I]t must not be forgotten that the state of Connecticut
is a FREE SOVEREIGN and INDEPENDENT State; that the United States
are a confederated and not a consolidated Republic," and that
it was refusing to support the war.
When the
1828 "Tariff of Abominations" created an average
tariff rate of 45%, applying mostly to Northern manufactured goods,
South Carolinians clearly understood that this was a pure act of
political plunder at their expense. They convened a political convention
to utilize the Jeffersonian idea of nullification and refused to
collect the tariff. They even got the South Carolina legislature
to allocate $160,000 for the purchase of firearms with which to
fend off any would-be federal tax collectors. The result was that
they forced the federal government to lower the tariff rate.
During
the 1850s the "middle states" of New York, Pennsylvania,
Delaware, Maryland, and New Jersey developed a very active secession
movement that sought to either join a Southern confederacy, form
a middle-states confederacy, or support Southern secession. (See
The
Secession Movement in the Middle States by William C. Wright).
Their overriding desire was to separate themselves from the imperious
New England Yankees.
When the
Southern states seceded in 186061, Abraham Lincoln pledged
his everlasting support for Southern slavery in his first inaugural
address, an address in which he endorsed a constitutional amendment
(the "Corwin Amendment") that would have forbidden the
federal government from ever interfering with slavery. In
the same speech he promised a military invasion and "bloodshed"
in any Southern state that ceased paying his beloved tariff on imports
which, at the time, accounted for more than 90% of federal tax revenue.
The average tariff rate had just been doubled by the Republican-controlled
Congress.
The Southern
states, along with most people in the North, still held the Jeffersonian
belief that governments derive their just powers from the consent
of the governed, and when that consent is withdrawn the citizens
have a duty to abolish the existing government and form a new one.
Jefferson never wrote in the Declaration of Independence that the
citizens have a duty to abolish the government and form a new one
"as long as the other states all agree that you may do so."
If the right of secession depends on someone else’s permission,
then one does not have a right of secession. That was a fantasy
invented by Lincoln, which he used to "justify" waging
total war on his own country, murdering some 350,000 American citizens,
including some 50,000 civilians. From that time on, government in
America was no longer "for the people, by the people, of the
people," as Chief Justice John Marshal once said in a phrase
that was later plagiarized by Lincoln. From that time on the purpose
of government has been for those who run it to plunder those who
do not. Nullification and secession were no longer tools with which
the citizens could control their own government.
The final
nails in the coffin of government by consent were pounded in during
the year 1913 with the advent of the federal income tax, the creation
of the Fed, and the Seventeenth Amendment calling for the direct
election of U.S. senators. The income tax and the Fed gave the federal
government the ability to do whatever it wanted to do regardless
of the Constitution – even to wage "undeclared" wars.
These vast "riches" were used to make millions of Americans
totally subservient to the state lest they lose their tiny government
subsidies, and to bribe or threaten state governments to do whatever
our masters in Washington, D.C. decree, lest they lose their cherished
federal highway grants. The ability of the citizens to oppose the
federal Leviathan by organizing political communities at the state
and local levels was finally destroyed and the centralized, monopolistic
bureaucracy that rules America and much of the rest of the world
today was created.
The direct
election of U.S. senators, as opposed to the original system of
having them appointed by state legislature, ended popular control
of the federal government. Today, candidates for the senate go to
New York, California, China, or wherever the big money is that can
be raised as "campaign contributions" to finance their
political careers. The interests of such "contributors"
are not necessarily congruent with those of the folks back home.
If
American citizens are to resist the rush to Obammunism they must
first give up on the fantasy that the Republican Party is anything
but another cabal of crooks, conmen and clowns, just like the Democratic
Party. The only realistic route to freedom, including a restoration
of genuine free enterprise, is through the devolution of power away
from Washington, D.C. via peaceful secession and nullification,
the original American ideals.
Thomas Jefferson
understood that democracy could never work in a country as large
as the U.S., let alone one with more than 300 million people. In
a January 29, 1804 letter to Dr. Joseph Priestly he wrote: "Whether
we remain one confederacy, or form into Atlantic and Mississippi
confederacies, I believe not very important to the happiness of
either part. Those of the western confederacy will be as much our
children & descendants as those of the eastern." On the
topic of secession, Jefferson continued: "[D]id I now foresee
a separation at some future day, yet I should feel the duty &
the desire to promote the western interests as zealously as the
eastern, doing all the good for both portions of our future family
which should fall within my power." When the New England Federalists
were threatening secession, Jefferson wrote to his friend John C.
Breckinridge on August 12, 1803 that if New England seceded and
created a second confederacy, "God bless them both if it be
for their good, but separate them, if it is better."
Unlike
Lincoln, Jefferson did not believe in threatening "bloodshed"
in the case of a "separation" or secession. He understood
that such behavior would be a moral abomination and an unimaginable
act of barbarianism. A civilized society does not wage total war
on "our children," as Jefferson described the future citizens
of a new state formed by an act of secession. Yet it is Lincoln,
not Jefferson, who is portrayed by American court historians as
a kindly, benevolent, and charitable angel.
The Constitution
long ago ceased placing any meaningful limits on governmental power.
This social contract between the American people and their government
was destroyed long ago by Hamiltonian nationalists. Americans now
live under a series of dictators (called "presidents")
who all believe that they are essentially dictators of the world,
capable of ordering the bombing of any place on earth without anyone’s
approval. (Within weeks, Obama dipped his hands in blood by ordering
a few bombs to be dropped in Pakistan).
As of this
writing, several dozen states have reportedly issued resolutions
in support of the Jeffersonian principle of nullification. These
will all be completely meaningless unless the American public has
the fortitude to actually enforce the resolutions and begin ignoring
any and all federal government actions that they interpret
as unconstitutional and illegitimate. In addition, citizens of every
state should learn about the Second Vermont Republic which, for
several years now, has been laying the groundwork for Vermont to
secede and once again become an free and independent republic, just
as all the states thought of themselves as being prior to 1865.
April
14, 2009
Thomas
J. DiLorenzo [send him mail]
is professor of economics at Loyola College in Maryland and the
author of The
Real Lincoln; Lincoln
Unmasked: What You’re Not Supposed To Know about Dishonest Abe
and How
Capitalism Saved America. His latest book is Hamilton’s
Curse: How Jefferson’s Archenemy Betrayed the American Revolution
– And What It Means for America Today.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at LRC
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at Mises.org
|