America’s
Jacobin Ideologues
by
Thomas J. DiLorenzo
by Thomas J. DiLorenzo
In his book
America
the Virtuous and in articles published on LewRockwell.com
and elsewhere, Professor Claes Ryn has clearly defined what he calls
the "Jacobin ideologues" in American society, otherwise
known as Straussians and neocons. Since I consider Abraham Lincoln
to have been a Jacobin, and his war a Jacobin revolution, I have
been a close follower of Professor Ryn’s work and its relevance
to American history. I have been struck by how Professor Ryn’s definitions
fit so many of today’s Lincoln idolaters like a glove. In his writing
he refers most often to Harry Jaffa and his fellow "Straussians"
as the chief Jacobin ideologues and contrasts them sharply to genuine
limited government conservatives. Let’s take a look at some of his
definitions.
1.
The Jacobin ideologue expresses no humility. I have seen
this time and again with the Straussian Lincoln cult. A good example
would be one humorous response to my book, The Real Lincoln,
by one of Jaffa’s fellow cultists, one Ken Masugi, who announced
that cult leader Jaffa had apparently "settled" all these
issues 50 years ago. Of course, nothing is ever settled permanently
in the social sciences, especially when it comes to something as
complicated as a war. Only members of a cult, who believe that THE
TRUTH comes only from the mouth of the cult leader, would believe
such a thing. No one with intellectual integrity would ever make
such a totalitarian-minded claim.
2. The
Jacobin ideologue has no use for actual history because he claims
to have special knowledge of "universal principles." This
explains why so much of what the Straussians say about Lincoln and
the war are flat out contradicted by real history. They don’t care
about real history. All they want to do is to repeat Jaffa’s false
theory that Lincoln was devoted to natural rights. The fact that
Lincoln repeatedly denied that black people should be able to exercise
these rights doesn’t matter. What matters is the fanciful theory
put forth by the cult leader.
3. The
Jacobin ideologue makes sweeping, categorical assertions as a
substitute for the real complexity of the world. This is another
reason why America’s Jacobins do not care about history. History
is complicated. War is complicated. All wars have multiple causes
and effects. But not the Jacobins’ wars. Lincoln’s war was caused
by slavery and slavery alone, despite the fact that Lincoln himself
and the entire U.S. government insisted otherwise. And the
war in Iraq is a war "for democracy" and nothing else,
period.
4. Jacobin
ideologues have unquestioning faith in their own moral superiority.
This explains why the Straussians so often behave in such a completely
vulgar, mannerless, and uncivilized way whenever anyone questions
any of their precepts. This is radically different from the normal
state of affairs in academe where such criticism is viewed as the
means of arriving at the truth through discussion and debate. It
is also why the Straussians are so despised (and largely ignored)
by the rest of academe.
The Straussian
Jacobins are not necessarily interested in the pursuit of truth:
they already know THE TRUTH. Harry Jaffa and other cult leaders
have revealed it to them. That’s why they so often attempt to assassinate
the character of anyone who dissents with the views of the cult
leader. A case in point is the viscous and hysterical smear campaign
against the late Professor Mel Bradford, a preeminent Lincoln critic,
after President Reagan nominated him to head the National Endowment
for the Humanities in 1981. He eventually withdrew his own nomination
in disgust.
Several years
later, in an article entitled "Against Lincoln: A Speech at
Gettysburg," Professor Bradford cynically recalled how "I
have found that I ‘favor slavery,’ consider it to be a ‘tenuous
multiracial experiment’ yet to receive the final verdict of history,
and that I censure Lincoln because of ‘what he did for racial equality.’
My reservations [about Lincoln] are described as ‘insulting to Lincoln’s
idea of liberty.’ And the very errors embodied in such wild charges,
requiring as they do some rejoinder, ‘prove’ that there is something
wrong with my character, regardless of their implausibility. . .
. I have ‘overturned the Declaration of Independence,’ called Lincoln
a ‘villain,’ and argued that ‘there is no right principle of action
but self interest.’ None of which can be documented from anything
I have written" (emphasis added). He was also falsely accused
of being a "Hitler admirer."
What we had
here was one of the first shots in the Straussian/Jacobin/neocon
takeover of the old conservative movement that really did believe
in limited government. Thus, Jaffa can be thought of as a sort of
Iranian Mullah light. He has no ability to issue a death warrant
to any Salmon Rushdies who might question or mock his "civil
religion" (a coin termed by Rousseau, the ideological godfather
of the French Jacobins and one of Jaffa’s favorite phrases), but
he can orchestrate smear campaigns against them such as the one
that was directed at Professor Bradford.
This episode,
and many others like it, prove the truthfulness of another of Professor
Ryn’s characteristics of a Jacobin ideologue: 5. The desire to
dominate and silence one’s ideological opponents rather than
engage in civilized discourse with them.
6. Jacobin
ideologues are also narrow-minded nationalists. They believe
that their country is morally superior to all others, and by virtue
of that "fact" they have a right and a duty to impose
their "moral" will on others. This of course is the old
New England Yankee impulse, derived from the Puritans, whose modern-day
ideological descendants are the neocons.
Lincoln mythology
plays an important role here, for the nonsense about America being
the "last best hope of earth" has long been used to assert
American moral superiority in world affairs. Hence when William
Bennett, the "Washington Fellow" of the Claremont Institute,
made a case for the Iraq War on the CBS "Sunday Morning"
television show on March 19, his closing line was, "we truly
are the last best hope of earth." (At which time the entire
nation is apparently supposed to collectively wet its pants and
sing the Battle Hymn of the Republic).
7. The
Jacobin ideologue is constantly warning about THE ENEMY, who is
so depraved, and so evil, that no compromise of any kind is possible.
Total War is the only solution, whether it’s the war on drugs or
the war in Iraq. This of course began with the demonization of southerners
prior to the War to Prevent Southern Independence, which continues
to this very day. Thus, I would add another characteristic to Professor
Ryn’s list: hatred of the south, its citizens, its history, and
even its contemporary institutions, from NASCAR to country music.
(Recall the hysterical and hate-filled responses by the media
to the movie "Gods and Generals," which portrayed Stonewall
Jackson as the deeply religious man that he was.)
Thus, Saddam
Hussein had to be compared to Hitler. As evil as Hussein was, he
was no Hitler. In making his case for the Iraq War William Bennett
cited an anonymous "observer" from the Washington Post
who asserted that Hussein and his thugs "starved babies,"
"gouged out the eyes of children," raped women in front
of their husbands, and even "slowly immersed victims in a vat
of acid." Wow. Too bad Bennett couldn’t provide an actual factual
reference for such shocking claims.
8. The
Jacobin ideologue has no fear of unlimited government as long
as Jacobins in good standing are in charge. Thus, the Straussians
defend the "Lincoln dictatorship" and its obliteration
of constitutional liberties in the northern states. They also routinely
point to Lincoln’s trashing of the Constitution in his day to "justify"
the Bush administration’s unprovoked war in Iraq, domestic spying,
the imprisonment of war opponents, the use of torture chambers,
and any and all usurpations of the Constitution.
Neocon "godfather"
Irving Kristol has mocked the entire classical liberal tradition
of limited constitutional government by mocking Friedrich Hayek’s
rendition of it in The
Road
to Serfdom. And the neocon Bush administration has certainly
done nothing at all, whatsoever, to limit government in any way.
9. The
Jacobin ideologue will redefine the Constitution in his pursuit
of unbridled political power. Again, Lincoln is the role model
when it comes to acting like a dictator by asserting that the Constitution
says something different from what actually appears in the document.
Jaffa has devoted much of his career to unsuccessfully defending
the Lincoln dictatorship against the facts of history. Today, the
Jacobin ideologues who run the Bush administration (and their supporters
in the media) tell us that the Constitution allows the government
to spy on every citizen, to torture prisoners in American prisons
– even American citizens, and even to imprison outspoken war opponents
if necessary.
10. The
Jacobin ideologue is also opposed to decentralization and true
federalism because such a system is too difficult to control
in dictatorial fashion. Once again, Lincoln is the role model here
since he destroyed the system of federalism that was established
by the American founding fathers and did more than anyone else to
usher in the centralized, bureaucratic state that we all slave under
today. This is why there has been no consideration given to a series
of republics in Iraq; several different republics populated by the
various ethnic tribes there would be more difficult to control and
dictate to than one centralized state that can be more easily managed
by the U.S. government. It would be much more conducive to a peaceful
and prosperous Iraq, but that’s not the goal of the American Jacobins.
Their goal is a puppet government.
This
is also why the idea of states’ rights is always immediately associated
with slavery and racism. The purpose of this is to censure discussion
of the oldest of American political traditions, a tradition that
the founding fathers thought of as the most powerful protection
against centralized governmental tyranny.
In
short, the phony and misdirected hatred of the French people that
was ginned up by the Bush administration and its media mouthpieces
at the beginning of the Iraq war should really be directed at America’s
Jacobin ideologues, who have adopted every destructive aspect of
the French Jacobin tradition, and then some.
The
French people eventually beheaded Robespierre, the leader of the
French Jacobins. Figuratively speaking, that would also be the well-deserved
fate of America’s Jacobin ideologues.
April
8, 2006
Thomas
J. DiLorenzo [send him mail]
is
the author of The
Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an
Unnecessary War,
(Three Rivers Press/Random House). His latest book is How
Capitalism Saved America: The Untold Story of Our Country’s History,
from the Pilgrims to the Present
(Crown Forum/Random House, August 2004).
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at LRC
Thomas
DiLorenzo Archives at Mises.org
|