The
Crusades
by
David Dieteman
The
Crusades are suddenly popular again.
Well,
at least in the United States of America. Mind you, Americans are
not cheering for the historic crusades of Christendom in the Holy
Land. Instead, a significant number of Americans are now cheering
for Bush the Crusader in his war against al Qaeda.
It
is mystifying that there are those who will cheer for the American
crusade against al Qaeda while condemning the crusades of Christendom.
First,
which of the historical situations is more serious?
By
far, we live in safer times today. Even after September 11, when
a bunch of terrorists finally did what any terrorist could have
done for a very long time, we live in safer times than did many
continental Europeans from 1096 to 1697.
Consider
the situation in the West only 319 years ago. In 1683, the armies
of the Ottoman Turks were laying siege to Vienna. Vienna, in the
center of Europe, nearly fell to the Turks. It was Jan Sobieski
and his Polish cavalry who helped to break the siege of Vienna and
preserve the West.
The
Ottoman wars, by the way, continued until the Turks were defeated
in northern Serbia in 1697.
In
short, Americans should not wonder why the former Yugoslavia was
and is such a mess. Of course, one suspects that many Americans
have already forgotten about the Balkans.
Americans
likely also have forgotten that Spain only evicted Arab invaders
around the time of Christopher Columbus, i.e., 200 years before
the siege of Vienna. Perhaps the Arab peoples were serious about
conquering Western Europe? In which case, maybe the historical crusades
of Christendom should be celebrated in the West, rather than the
subject of apologies.
Second,
where Christians, and religious believers generally, are concerned,
the American crusade of Bush the Second is wholly secular. The federal
government of the United States is nothing if not hostile to religion
in general and Christianity in particular. There is a certain irony
in a secular American regime seeking to topple a secular Iraqi regime
while claiming to defend "the West."
Thank
God, the atheist Left-wing elites must be thinking, that we no longer
fight wars of religion! Now we fight for money, oil, and geopolitical
power! This is "historical progress."
If
nothing else, the American power elites and their lackeys in Washington
are dedicated to turning Boy Scouts into Sodomy Scouts, a free nation
into a militaristic empire (query whether this hasn’t already been
done), and free men into serfs (same query).
In
order to fully evaluate the crusades of Bush II, assume, for the
sake of argument, that the United States defeats Iraq in a military
fashion, and eliminates not only al Qaeda, but every other terrorist
organization in existence. What will the United States have gained?
At most, it will have expended millions upon millions of dollars
to: (a) alienate the Islamic world, and foreign nations generally;
and (b) eliminate a nebulous risk of vague future harm. An American
war on Iraq is as sensible as a Chinese war on Belgium.
The
military threat which Iraq and al Qaeda pose to American national
interests, properly understood, is minimal. The risk is especially
minimal in comparison to the risks posed by the Communists during
the Cold War. And yet, in the name of eliminating this minimal threat,
the Bush Administration is seeking to effectively shred the Bill
of Rights and to tax America into an impoverished future. In short,
American liberty is being restricted to an even greater degree than
it was restricted to fight the Communists. This is foolish.
Forget
the Bush crusades against al Qaeda and Iraq. At best, they will
be Pyrrhic victories.
September
2, 2002
Mr.
Dieteman [send him mail] is
an attorney in Erie, Pennsylvania, and a PhD candidate in philosophy
at The Catholic University of America.
©
2002 David Dieteman
David
Dieteman Archives
|