TV
Nation: The Killing of American Brain Cells
by
Karen De Coster and
Brad Edmonds
Growing
up in the 70s, it was so common to be active in a range of endeavors
that TV watching was typically reserved for after 8pm – pajamas,
a no-brand cola, cheese puffs, Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In,
and life was good. No kid wanted to be indoors for too long, no
matter what the temperature was outside.
As
adults, neither of us watch TV, at least since the days of M*A*S*H
and Northern
Exposure. Well, except for sports, sports news, and the
occasional late night show. We hate TV. We loathe it. Okay,
the only contemporary shows – of all the sitcoms and dramas and
reality stuff both of us will give some credence to are The
Simpsons and Cops. The Simpsons is a passable
show with some clever themes, and Cops can be especially
entertaining because the producers always manage to scour up some
footage of debris from the bottom tiers of the urban social order.
TV,
along with sugar, is one of the great evils in society. Walk
into the home of any friend or family member, say hi to the kids,
and they don't dare turn their face away from the tube to acknowledge
that you’ve walked in, because they just can’t be distracted from
their daily dose of obedience to their visual master. Their faces
are frozen to the tube because they are unable to lose their trance
for even a single moment. Look at their eyes, and note they are
hugely dilated by the light of the idiot box.
Our
observation is, and has been, that the American public we know of
has been weaned on TV, and they are lost without that dumb tube
staring back at their faces. The American TV nation has become a
docile bunch of followers who are far too easily entertained by
any and all attempts at dumbing them down.
Besides,
who doesn’t notice the progression of sitcoms where the man in the
house has gone from the family leader to the laughingstock nincompoop
of the house – always stupid, clueless, under everyone’s thumb,
and constantly being swatted down by the wife. The problem is, that
sort of representation is now the truth of many households, thanks
to a generation of docility brought on by militant feminism and
leftist Hollywood.
In
order to preserve your sanity and intelligence, here are some good
reasons to not watch TV:
1.
Opportunity costs: You could spend the same time doing such things
as reading something job-related that might make you more successful
in the future; reading something intellectual that will make you
more fun at parties and less gullible to advertisers and
government propaganda; doing something job-related that will make
you more money right now; or exercising so you can better enjoy
not only the extra money you’ll earn but also the people you’ll
spend it with.
2.
Direct costs: TV stupids you. The intellectual level of major-network
sitcom dialogue and situations is (we’re guessing) 6th
grade. The more time you spend at that level, the more that level
will describe you. Typical sitcom conflicts involve such things
as a teenager’s parent(s) disallowing some risky social activity;
children interfering with a parent’s plan to watch sports on TV;
someone throwing a party that turns out to be no fun; an adult meeting
a long-lost relative; and so on ad pukum. The conflicts themselves
are nothing more than substrates for the delivery of funny lines.
The conflicts seem typical of 1960s sitcoms, though they are from
next week’s online television listings. One would assume (without
watching) that the jokes are retreads, too. You being stupided is
a relatively insignificant direct cost, because it’s just you. Much
worse is:
3.
Moral costs: Sex
in the City, Fear Factor, Temptation Island,
and other reality shows focusing on sexual fidelity/infidelity,
shows that normalize or glamorize violence, and other down-defining
(to paraphrase Rush Limbaugh) presentations have an impact on people’s
behavior: garbage in, garbage out. The more you watch people behave
immorally, the more you consider the behavior normal and permissible.
This may not apply to you personally, but when the images are presented
night after night, year after year, to a population of 280 million
people, there are effects on the population. If our founders were
correct in stating that their highly libertarian experiment required
a religious, moral populace, we may have in television a partial
explanation of the "progression" from our minarchist 1780s to the
American socialism we have today.
4.
There's more than snobbery in being able to say you don't watch
television – for example, there are practical benefits, such as
being able to find the people you want to meet at parties. As soon
as you admit you don't know any of the characters in Friends,
indeed that you've never seen an episode, the Friends
fans will begin to wander away from you, while the attractive, vibrant,
professional person there will wander over and ask what you think
of, say, the relationships between property rights and political
freedom.
5.
If you're into passive entertainment, there are more nourishing
forms of it than television...though admittedly there is the occasional
requirement that you think. There's a difference between a string
of sitcoms and a rerun of One
Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest; and there's a bigger difference
between watching mud wrestling and watching a chess match.
6.
You have a finite number of hours to live. You will bequeath something
to your family and to humanity. Would you rather it be memories
of you consuming hours laughing at the equivalent of pie throwing;
or memories of fortunes you earned, meaningful conversations you
had, home repairs you made, or songs you sang at the piano?
7.
As long as you have a finite number of hours to live, consider what
you spend those hours doing. Twenty years from now: Would you rather
be sitting on the beach, alone with your thoughts, having watched
20 years of TV; or would you rather be on that beach alone with
your thoughts having done 20 years of other things? There are self-administered
rewards that accrue to achievement. Partake of them. They cost only
the time you would've spent watching TV. The entire history of the
best of human thought and action is available for free on the internet,
just as one example.
On
the whole, folks our age – even colleagues who are high-level business
consultants and whatnot – think we’re "odd ducks" because we don't
know the latest Friends, NYPD
Blue, or Bachelorette storyline; they think we are
the weird ones because we could care less about the 347 reality
TV shows now on the air. All they talk about at the office is TV,
TV, TV, and more TV. We go out to lunch with the folks at
the office, and the topic of the day, every day, is TV. Who wants
to deal with the collective, I-need-to-be-entertained mentality
of the TV crowd day in and day out?
These
boob tube people all have "their shows" every night, meaning, Monday
they have to be home to watch blah, blah, and Tuesday is their night
to watch blah, blah, and…you get the picture. They even obsess on
the early evening reruns of shows they've watched over and over
already. They eschew all the glories of life for static TV
viewing.
Our
formerly intellectual American culture is sunk. Perhaps it
is lost forever. The docile masses are in a perpetual trance
from the daily absorption of TV, propaganda, and State edicts. They
take anything and everything at face value. TV is a way for them
to be led to the herding gates, waiting for the next order. TV
keeps them entertained and at bay. It’s stunning how easily so
many people are amused by the stupid and meaningless. The stupider
the sitcom, the more people like it. As a matter of fact, we voted
2-0 on Friends being the most brainless TV series ever. Or
should it be Married
With Children?
The
TV watching masses make up the perfect audience to take marching
orders from the State. They love TV, and it often seems that some
of them would give you their children before they'd give up their
TV.
March
5, 2003
Karen
De Coster, CPA, [send
her mail] is a paleolibertarian freelance writer, graduate student
in Austrian Economics, and a business professional from Michigan.
Her first book is currently in the works. See her Mises
Institute archive for more online articles, and check out her
website, along with her
blog. Brad
Edmonds [send him mail]
writes from Alabama.
Copyright © 2003 Karen De Coster
Karen
De Coster Archives
|