Whose
Real World Are We Talking About?
by
Karen De Coster
by Karen De Coster
The
act of homeschooling is not an impulse, nor is it an overzealous,
protective scheme to keep children from acquiring the warts and
scabs that are passed around in the "real world." Homeschooling
is a way of life, a philosophy of acquiring education and intellectual
growth, and it is the result of a mindset dedicated to the raising
of one’s children in the most efficient and gainful way possible.
Homeschooling is proving that your children and their future is
the most important thing to you.
So
why does Detroit News columnist, Laura Berman, take an unpleasant
poke at homeschooling that fails to make any legitimate point whatsoever?
Laura’s storytelling goes
like this:
I
never thought the day would arrive when I would understand the
impulse to home school.
The
idea of removing children from the real world and educating them
in the cloister of your basement rec room in essence to
deprive your children of any knowledge but that which you spoon-feed
them has always struck me as problematic, if not wrongheaded.
Until
last Tuesday.
That
was when my daughter asked a question I'd presumed to be still
years away.
"Mommy,
can I have lip gloss?"
She's
not yet 4. We were eating breakfast.
"No,
you may not have lip gloss," I responded.
Then,
I wondered: How does she know about lip gloss? Who is giving her
lip gloss?
And
so I conceived the first component of my personal home-school
curriculum: It would provide a 100 percent lip gloss-free environment
for children under 6. In fact, the entire industry of cosmetics
for 4-year-olds would not be allowed in my home school.
Therefore,
a child growing up too fast – the ole lip gloss analogy is Berman's
thrust for thinking that there has got to be a better way, other
than homeschooling, to keep your kids from all the sin and corruption
out there in that, well, you know, "real world." The lip gloss analogy
is meant to make fun of those folks that want to maintain control
over the direction of their child’s education, and preserve the
course of their child’s ultimate living and learning environment.
Saying that children are missing out on elements of some illusory
"real world" presumes that there is some strict definition
out there that rigidly circumscribes exactly that which should exist
in the world, and what we should experience in order for us to even
be counted in such a world. After all, whose real world are
we talking about?
Berman
is using homeschooling as a target a target for pointing out that
you are foolish if you think you can shield your kids from life's
little realities, like, you know, having them ask what an orgasm
is at age five, smoking cigarettes at nine, and having oral sex
or intercourse at age ten.
Apparently,
in Mrs. Berman’s world, it's not "real world" to:
-
have your
child spend 3 hours per day on high-level, individualized, efficient
learning, instead of six, unproductive hours being either overwhelmed
by lesser morons, or underwhelmed by no intellectual challenges
whatsoever.
-
teach
your child classical piano, how to read music, how to study
intellectual history, speak Latin, and learn calculus, and much
of that by age nine or ten, instead of sending them off to a
public craphole to play "Lowest Common Denominator" or "Who's
got the condom, and how do we put it on?"
-
spend
your day teaching your kid how to lead a virtuous,
educated life according to your vision of the world,
instead of shoving them off on a public system where uneducated
strangers would tell your kid how to live and learn according
to their prejudices and their ideals. Imagine
that horror of taking the parental responsibility to hand down
religious values, virtues, and moral teaching? The gall of a
homeschooling parent!
In
addition, it's terribly sad to observe people being so attached
to the notion of a spoon-fed, public education (that's right Laura....that's
where the real spoon-feeding is). It is as if they cannot even envisage
an instance where parents would take it upon themselves (gasp!)
to educate their kids, using their own dollars, time, and energy,
and do so without the force and dollars of the State to do it for
them.
By
now, everyone knows that my city, Detroit, has the
worst schools on the planet. The Chief Executive Officer of
Detroit's schools, Kenneth Burnley, makes
a quarter million a year, in a totally failed school district
that is going more belly-up by the day. And that isn't a market-determined
wage. The city’s school system is deteriorating, and though Burnley
takes
some heat, the accountability for failure is passed around within
the district like a corner street singer’s hat.
Here's
one cruel but truthful observation I can't resist, in regards to
the Bush administration’s No Child Left Behind silliness, and its
effect on the Detroit schools:
In Detroit,
all of its 41 high schools failed
the federal standards.
Welcome
to the public school system – that means any public school system,
and not just Detroit’s mess. Out in the 'burbs, things don't get
a whole lot better, except the "federal standard" passing
rates are a little higher.
Berman
is feeble, as she essentially tells the reader that all homeschooling
is "removed from the real world," as she, by way of her carefully-placed
words and posturing, glorifies the spoon-fed, force-fed, collective,
welfare education handed down by a bunch of greedy, overpaid, hapless
bureaucrats that park their butts in overpaid jobs and fancy offices,
enriching themselves and their little power trips at the expense
of local taxpayers, running public-fed schools into the ground.
And this, she deems, is the "real world."
Folks
of this type are what I call Education
Nazis. These types, who venerate the State, will do most anything
so that parents can not have control over their kids' education,
without further interference and orders from the higher-ups. The
Education Nazis of the world will rationalize the need for public
education and disparage homeschooling in the most wearisome ways:
it’s too isolated and horrible and cruel for the kids, they say;
it’s depriving your kids of a great, public-schooled lifestyle,
they say; and it’s denying them the development of normal,
social skills. Imagine how horrible it is to spend more time at
home with Mommy or Daddy, instead of running with the collective
forces at the public school, or being bullied by every unruly kid
who doesn’t like the way you look.
The
anti-homeschool criticism is pure bunk, with no substance behind
it, other than raw emotions from the babbling, we-know-what’s-best-for-your-family
types. This criticism is part of a totalitarian
mindset, one that is prevalent within our do-gooder, interventionist
society. They are the ones that want to force everyone else into
their "real world" via mandates, laws, and authoritative
force. Newsflash Mrs. Berman: not everyone who homeschools their
children is a survivalist-fundamentalist-whacko that wants to shield
their kids from lip gloss, short skirts, and bad words, and lock
them away in the potato-and-rations cellar for the duration of their
childhood.
To
reiterate the words of the individualist and libertarian vigilante,
Auberon Herbert: "By what right do men exercise power over
each other?" There is no right. There is only the coercive
power of the State, controlled via monopoly privilege, as it empowers
the chosen elites, and force-feeds our children in what is perhaps
the greatest debacle to ever molest man’s mind: the dumbed-down,
collective-public education scheme.
If
Laura Berman, and others that think like her, believe that a homeschool
environment has merits and advantages, they should contemplate taking
such an action. However, if they don't have enough love and guts
to educate
their kids within their own framework for ideal growth, then
they can hush up and get back to their PTA meetings.
After
all, shoving your kids out the door every morning, to someplace
else where someone else is responsible for their intellectual progress
and character development, is the cheap, easy way out. Comparatively,
homeschooling is like taking the high road. But I guarantee you
that they’ll be to Scotland before ye.
November
30, 2004
Karen
De Coster, CPA, [send
her mail] is a libertarian freelance writer; graduate student
in Economics and Finance; full-time, auto industry, finance professional;
and a part-time, tax-season hack. Born and raised in the shadow
of the Big Three, she is fond of American-made pick-ups, Japanese
SUVs, Belgian beer, Polish food, Italian markets, (real) Mexican
restaurants, Harley Davidsons, the
Waughs, Murray Rothbard, H.L. Mencken, and photographing smalltown
Americana. She makes a mean city chicken recipe, doesn’t have time
to recycle, thinks Bill O’Reilly is a Nazi, and she spends her spare
time evading
the Homeland Security Nazis for kicks and grins. She aspires
to disturb the peace of the complacent, content, collectivist masses
that would sell their souls – and hers for a little security,
a cushy easy chair, and a big-screen, color TV. See her Mises
Institute archive for more online articles, and check out her
website, along with her
blog.
Copyright © 2004 Karen De Coster
Karen
De Coster Archives
|