How To Convince Men To Drive Drunk
by Mark R. Crovelli
by Mark R. Crovelli
What
I am about to reveal to you lawmakers of the world are some fool-proof
instructions for drafting and enacting laws that will transform
men who are disinclined to drive while intoxicated into dangerous
drunk drivers. I am not sure whether you will find these instructions
useful in your professional lives, but I am fairly certain that
you will find this information edifying nonetheless.
The
overall strategy that you ought to pursue if you want to convince
men to drive drunk is to make sure that they have no (or few) viable
options open to them besides getting behind the wheel when they’re
drunk. More specifically, what you should aim at accomplishing is
to increase the costs of the alternatives to drunk driving, which
will concomitantly decrease the relative costs associated with drunk
driving. While this might appear initially to be a difficult
feat to accomplish, it is actually quite frequently and easily achieved
in practice.
Let’s
look at a classic example of how to draft a law that will convince
men to drive drunk. In fact, this is one of the best possible ways
to make sure that there are more drunk drivers on the road than
there otherwise would be. The general objective in this case is
to make sure that all men who are thinking about sleeping off their
intoxication in their vehicles choose to drive home instead. In
order to achieve this result, all you have to do is draft and enact
laws that punish
sleeping in one’s car while intoxicated in exactly the same
way that you punish drunk drivers. What you will have achieved
by enacting such a law is to have increased the costs associated
with choosing not to drive while intoxicated, while having simultaneously
decreased the relative costs associated with driving drunk.
When faced with the choice of sleeping
in a truck cab versus his own bed a man is likely to opt for
the latter choice and drive home, when the costs associated with
either option are the same. After all, why not choose
to drive home and sleep in your own bed, when you could get a
DUI anyway just by sleeping in your car? If you are looking
for laws to enact that will convince men to drive drunk, this should
be one of the first options you consider.
Another
effective method for increasing the number of dangerous drunk drivers
on the road is to enact laws that will lead the population to be
more intoxicated on a regular basis than they otherwise would be.
If you can convince men to drink a pint of whiskey instead of just
drinking a few beers, for example, you will of course have drunker
and more dangerous drivers on the road. Don’t for a minute think
that this goal is impossibly out of reach for you far-seeing lawmakers.
One of the most effective ways to accomplish this feat is to dramatically
increase the tax on beer (and, hence, its overall price), which
decreases the relative price of hard liquor. Since it is much more
difficult for drinkers to ascertain how intoxicated they are when
drinking, say, shots of Jack Daniels compared to drinking Coors
Light, you can be assured that there will be many more stupendously
drunk drivers on the road than there would have been without this
tax. Feel free to improvise here. If you can use your taxing power
in other ways to ensure that people will drink vodka, gin, and whiskey
(or, better yet, Bacardi 151) instead of drinking their preferred
light beer, you will have accomplished the same goal of creating
more dangerous drunk drivers on the road. For more information on
how to use taxes and prohibition to make Americans more drunk, I
recommend reading Mark Thornton’s excellent book The
Economics of Prohibition [PDF].
You
can also cause people to drink more than they otherwise would by
constantly tightening the legal definition of drunkenness. This
option is a bit more subtle, but is nonetheless effective. In order
to see how to employ this strategy, consider this example. If the
definition of drunkenness is legally established at, say, .15%,
men are in a position to be able to drink a few beers, have a bit
of fun, and still stay well below the legal limit. They also
have an incentive to slow down before they approach that limit and
risk getting a DUI. If you tighten the definition of drunkenness,
however, to, say, .08% or even .02%, men can only consume one or
two drinks before they are already over the legal limit. And, once
they are over the limit, they have no incentive whatsoever to
slow down. Since they’re already over the limit with two drinks,
and can already get a DUI if stopped, why not keep drinking? There
is certainly no legal incentive for them to slow down after they’ve
passed this ridiculous definition of drunkenness.
The
same holds true should you choose to treat all people with alcohol
in their veins as "drunk," no matter how much they have
consumed over the legal limit. If you punish a man just as severely
with a BAC of.09% as you do men with BAC’s of .25%, what possible
reason could a man have to slow down his drinking after he’s over
the limit? Since he will receive the same punishment whether he
drinks five cocktails or fifteen, he is not encouraged by the law
even in the slightest bit to slow down. If you are looking for more
elegant and subtle ways to increase the number of truly dangerous
drunk drivers, this might be the option for you.
Yet
another method for increasing drunk driving that I would like to
share with you concerns alternative transportation. If you can manage
to drastically reduce the amount of safe, alternative transportation
in your jurisdiction, you will go a long way toward making sure
there are more drunk drivers on the road. If you can foist a government-backed
cartel in the taxi and limousine trade in your jurisdiction,
for example, you will be effectively depriving drunk people of a
cheap and safe alternative to driving when they are drunk. And,
without having the option of these cheap and safe forms of transportation,
they will choose to drive drunk more frequently than they otherwise
would. A more effective method for creating more drunk drivers would
be hard to find. This option has the added benefit that the people
thus deprived of cheap and safe transportation won’t even know that
it is responsible for increases in the incidence of drunk driving!
Finally,
it is critically important for you lawmakers to avoid legalizing
drunk driving at all costs, if you want to make sure that there
are both more drunk drivers and more
dangerous drunk drivers on the road. If you follow these simple
prescriptions, in no time you will find a veritable epidemic of
drunk driving in your jurisdiction emerging, and the booty from
drunk driving arrests will start to flow in.
Just
remember not to crack a smile when you hold press conferences in
your district piously proclaiming that you are doing everything
in your power to reduce drunk driving.
April
14, 2009
Mark R.
Crovelli [send him mail]
writes from Denver, Colorado.
Copyright
© 2009 by LewRockwell.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in
part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Mark
R. Crovelli Archives
|