From Solon to Sub-Prime: Gold in a World of Inflation
by
Sean Corrigan
by Sean Corrigan
DIGG THIS
Often
has it crossed my fancy, that the city loves to deal
With
the very best and noblest members of her commonweal,
Just as with our ancient coinage and the newly-minted gold.
Yea for these, our sterling pieces all of pure Athenian mould,
All of perfect die and metal, all the fairest of the fair,
All of workmanship unequalled, proved and valued everywhere
Both amongst our own Hellenes and Barbarians far away,
These we use not: but the worthless, pinchbeck coins of yesterday,
Vilest die and basest metal, now we always use instead.
Aristophanes,
The Frogs
For the past
2½ millennia, the Lydian king Croesus has been a byword for fabulous
wealth, the prime beneficiary of vast riches accumulated partly
by the trading skills of his subjects and partly as a result of
the copious alluvial deposits of electrum – a naturally-occurring
alloy of gold, silver, and copper – which were to be found in the
country’s rivers (placed there when the even more legendary Midas
washed away the curse of his golden touch, we are told).
Indeed, it
was here in Lydia that the first stamped and standardised coins
began to circulate, at the turn of the 6th century BC;
a development which allowed for a wider monetization of trade and
hence unleashed what some historians have called a "commercial
revolution" across the Ancient world.
The idea that
financial innovation can provide a stimulus to real activity – warranted
or otherwise – is one with which we should all be very familiar,
but there is a slightly darker parallel at the core of Croesus’
extreme affluence: namely, that the official Lydian coins show a
suspiciously low 50–60% gold content, in sharp contrast to the 80%
and higher constituency to be found in the unadulterated local alloy.
The strong
implication is that, not content with earning a modest degree of
seignorage from the royal mint and too impatient to wait for genuine
economic growth to add to his storied pile, Croesus greatly enhanced
his status as the prototypical Über-High Net Worth individual
by practising the world’s first recorded instance of surreptitious
currency debasement and by profiting all the more from the ensuing
inflation.
| |
 |
| |
The
Lydian trite
|
| |
|
The analogy
goes further, for Croesus, professing himself alarmed at the rise
of Persian power on his borders, decided to spend some of his immense
hoard in launching a pre-emptive strike on his neighbours’ upwardly-mobile
ruler Cyrus (does this all sound horribly familiar?), having been
bolstered in his aggression by a quintessentially Delphic prophecy
that if he crossed over the border into hostile territory he would
bring down a great empire.
Alas! Our Pre-o-Neocon
plutocrat forgot to ask the Pythia just which empire she
meant exactly and nearly paid the ultimate price for "sexing
up" the intelligence in this manner when, shortly thereafter,
he found himself at Cyrus’ mercy, having been delivered into his
conqueror’s hands during the sack of the Lydian capital, Sardis.
Even if we
can’t link Croesus’ inflationary policies directly to his subsequent
military humiliation, we can share Hemingway’s sour observation
that for such "political and economic opportunists" as
he, the "first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation
of the currency; the second is war" and that while "both
bring a temporary prosperity," they also both lead to "permanent
ruin."
The role
of gold today
Morality tales
aside, however, does this have any relevance to the role of gold
in one’s portfolio today? We think the answer is, yes.
But, before
expanding upon this assertion, the first thing we have to make clear
is that – however ardently the Goldbugs may wish it were – gold
is no longer, in any sense, a "money," that is, it does
not function as the present good par excellence, the medium
of exchange, the one thing universally accepted, on demand and at
par, for all the other goods and services one wishes to buy with
it.
In short, you
can’t easily settle your bar bill with a bar of bullion, nor – under
current political circumstances – are you ever likely to be able
to, no matter how much better off we all might be were the yellow
metal to be reinstated in its rightful place at the heart of economic
life.
Accordingly,
the fact that gold is no longer money means we have to turn its
historic function upside down and accept that it is no longer able
to provide protection during those rare periods when money itself
becomes painfully scarce – i.e., during a deflation (properly
defined).
In microcosm,
we can see an example of this axiom at work whenever we suffer that
lesser species of contraction which is a margin-driven liquidation
of market positions – hence gold’s ~7% decline when the credit crunch
first began to bite in August of this year.
Conversely,
ever since this uniquely liquid, highly fungible, easily storable,
durable, scarce, real asset has been denied its monetary birthright
by virtue of its intrinsic lack of compatibility with the workings
of populist-democracy welfare states, it has had to be thought of
as a kind of anti-money: one largely to be held during periods
of inflation, when the impaired currency we actually use
is in a dangerous overabundance.
Gold’s late
run has therefore come about since the Bernanke Fed was first panicked
into cutting the discount rate, since the ECB abandoned its stance
of "strong vigilance" to send the Eurocopters flying over
its shaky banks, and since the Old Lady begrudgingly bailed out
Northern Rock (and hence all its counterparts) under explicit government
duress.
The arguments
may still be raging about exactly who, or what, was responsible
for the recent financial turmoil, or to what extent it will come
to affect the wider economy, but one unavoidable conclusion can
already be reached: namely, that the sustained inflation of money
and credit has become such an integral part of our modern way of
life that our rulers fervently believe that it must never be allowed
to slow (much less reverse) for fear of toppling over the whole,
precarious house of cards which we have so painstakingly built about
ourselves.
During the
past few months, the stark truth is that our central bankers have
once more revealed – both in word and deed – that, as Charles Goodhart
explicitly put it a few years back, "deflation is a policy
choice": the unspoken corollary to which is that "inflation
is, and always will be, the preferred policy choice."
‘…towards
carrying on the War against France’
The prudent
investor cannot afford to ignore the implications of this doctrine.
He must realise that the money which he holds in his hands – and
in which he routinely calculates both his profit and loss and
his overall wealth – is not to be trusted: that it is doomed to
lose value – now at a slower, now at a faster, rate – but always
diminishing in worth.
Not only must
he contend with this broad, underlying current of depreciation,
but he must also be aware that the quickening and slowing of its
stream, as well as the twists and turns which make up its course,
give rise to the business cycle itself and so make the longer-term
preservation of capital an all the more difficult task to accomplish.
Forget all
the fine words about containing "inflation expectations"
or "preserving price stability." From their very first
incarnations in 17th century Sweden and England, central
banks have been purposeful mechanisms for shoring up profligate
governments (whether these are buying guns or butter
without properly funding the purchase) while serving as a backstop
to the inherently flawed and highly unstable practice of fractional
reserve banking.
Thus, at the
first sign that a crisis is about to erupt in a financial system
which could only have become so perilously over-extended because
of a prolonged episode of central bank laxity, the first priority
will invariably be to rescue the principal culprits by dousing the
wildfires raging about them with exactly the same brand of flammable
liquid which was used to fuel them in the first place.
In running
true to form at this particular juncture, we can only underline
that we feel the price risks being run by the central banks are
extraordinary. Not the least of these is the danger that the US
will provoke the fourth great reserve currency crisis in a century
– the previous three being the abandonment of the gold standard
during the Great War, the collapse of the gold exchange standard
during the Great Depression, and the break-up of Bretton Woods at
the start of the Great Inflation.
Since this
is a chronicle of the successive adulteration of money and of the
serial acceptance of a more bastardized replacement when the burdens
of the previous one become too much for political expediency to
bear, we can expect profound consequences to follow – social and
political, as well as purely financial – if the ailing dollar does,
indeed, end up being widely forsaken by its anxious sponsors.
A flight to
real values might well be unleashed in such a pass, potentially
boosting the price of our anti-money, gold, to unheard of heights
along the way.
At the same
time, the full panoply of protectionism, export bans, income support,
wage freezes, and the direct administration of prices – already
surfacing in several countries around the world – could devastate
entrepreneurial activity and usher in a nasty and protracted recession.
Should this
transpire, the thing to bear in mind is that, in the two years from
the first quarter of 1973, annualised, quarterly real GDP in the
US plunged from 10.6% to –4.7%, yet the price of gold tripled, that
of oil quadrupled, and wheat’s gain to the monthly peak was 160%.
Nor was this
an isolated incident, for worse was to come, just five years later,
during the two years from the second quarter of 1978, when US GDP
underwent an even more remarkable swoop from +16.7% to –7.8%. That
time, wheat rose 70%; the price of a barrel of crude was well on
its way to tripling; and the number of rapidly shrinking dollars
needed to buy an ounce of gold quintupled.
Along the way,
the world painfully re-learned the truth that inflation and recession
were not mutually exclusive. Perhaps the lesson is about to be repeated
for a generation which has again forgotten the rudiments of proper,
pre-Keynesian economics.
Solon’s
New Deal Athens
Back in 6th
century BC Lydia, Cyrus’ first impulse was to have his captured
enemy, Croesus, burnt at the stake. However, soon after the faggots
were lit, his royal victim could be heard plaintively uttering the
name of Solon. Piqued by this, the Persian ordered the flames to
be doused and inquired of his erstwhile foe what he had meant, only
to be told that the famous Athenian law-giver had once warned Croesus
that fortune was so fickle that it was impossible to say which man
was truly fortunate until his life had finally ended and a full
account of it rendered.
Recognising
true wisdom when he heard it, Cyrus immediately ordered Croesus
to be spared and, indeed, went so far in his reconciliation as to
make him a senior member of his council – a far-sighted piece of
clemency well beyond the ken of the present era’s serial regime
changers.
As for Solon,
well he, too, would have been fully at home today.
A well-known
establishment figure who was appointed to the archonship amid the
severe credit crisis which was mowing down broad swathes of woefully
over-mortgaged smallholders, he first absolved the sad, deluded
"condo flippers" of his day of all responsibility for
the unpayable debts imposed upon them by oligarchic "predatory
lenders." Next, he attempted to counteract the deflationary
affects of this officially sanctioned mass default by means of a
37% devaluation of the drachma – moves which laid him open to charges
that he had allowed certain of his acquaintances (later branded
the Repudiators) into the secret ahead of time, so enabling them
to profit inordinately from the eventual rescue plan.
Plus ça
change, for today we see Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson scrambling
to prevent the contemporary mortgage crisis from worsening, while
the Fed has cut rates in the face of a dollar declining at an annualized
pace not that far removed from Solon’s one-off parity change.
With almost
preternatural resonance, Chairman Bernanke has also been reviled
for naïvely sounding out the opinions of the good and great immediately
before he started cutting rates, while Paulson, for his part, has
been accused of tipping off the members of his notorious Working
Group early enough for them to take a lucrative advantage of the
imminent policy easing. Neither charge, however unfounded it might
be, has done much to restore confidence in either the credit system
or the ailing dollar.
Scarcity
v Abundance
So, where for
a gold price which has already had a spectacular – if, so far, brief
– run to well beyond what (unsurprisingly) proved the largely illusory
"barrier" of $800/oz?
Well, in the
short run, caution must be exercised as the speculative throng on
the main COMEX exchange have built up an unprecedented long position
of up to 240,000 contracts. To put that into perspective, the size
of the bet works out at about 745 tonnes equivalent, roughly equivalent
to a four months’ mined supply of metal. With so much hot money
having been brought to the party in so short a time, it is little
wonder that the recent price action has been so savage.
Looking beyond
this, however, consider that, over the past two years alone, broad
money in the US, the UK, the Eurozone, and the BRIC quartet (of
Brazil, Russia, India, and China) has risen a combined $11.5 trillion
– equivalent to around $70,000 for every ounce of newly mined gold
wrested from anything down to 4½ kilometres deep in the Earth’s
crust in that same period.
Bear in mind
also that the outstanding notional stock of derivatives has soared
to more than $1/2 quadrillion over this horizon, representing
an extra $1.7 million haystack in which to search for the
poisoned needle of mathematically-abstruse, systemic risk for each
and every, readily-valued, new ounce of metal brought laboriously
up from the Stygian gloom and into the broad light of day.
Such are the
risks and so great is the disproportion entailed in this orgy of
overtrading and speculation that a clamour has arisen on both sides
of the Atlantic for the central banks to undertake yet more inflation
in order to stave off a potentially damaging aftermath.
You see, no
matter how big the inflationary bubble, an offsetting deflation
is merely a policy choice to be avoided in its wake. No cold
turkey will be endured here – no emetic will be taken to purge the
poison – only a stiff hair of the dog administered to spare the
drunk the worst of his pain.
In light of
this – and with gold still some 6065% off its CPI-adjusted
peaks in dollars, deutschemarks, and in terms of US average
wages – we can confidently argue that while the metal may have undergone
an impressive degree of reassessment already in this young century,
it has hardly exhausted all its strength in this latest round of
its multi-millennium struggle against the endemic evil of inflation
– an inference that is likely to hold even if a misguided American
electorate fails to give Ron Paul the chance to restore both the
long-lost Jeffersonian Republic and the sound money, based
on a true gold standard, so essential to its future maintenance
.
A version
of this article appeared in the November issue of the Hedge
Fund Journal.
December
20, 2007
Sean
Corrigan [send him mail]
writes from Switzerland.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Sean
Corrigan Archives
|