Sweden, Banana Republic
by
Per Bylund
by Per Bylund
DIGG THIS
On September
17 the voting sheep of Sweden made an end to a very long saga: the
social democratic hegemony in Swedish politics. A center-right coalition
of four parties gained a majority of votes and formed a new government
in the beginning of October. The potential change in politics this
may lead to, however at best marginal,
is welcomed by many an entrepreneur. But the new government didn’t
start out setting a powerful agenda; it is more like a farce.
Before the
new government, lead by somewhat conservative party leader Mr. Reinfeldt,
could even present a budget, two ministers had already had to resign.
The minister of trade, Ms. Borelius, was forced to resign after
only eight days as minister because of harassments in the media
due to the nature of her personal finances. She had committed no
crime, except for hiring a nanny for her children now and then (the
crime being not having paid employers "fees" of 33%).
The real problem,
as reported in the media, was the fact that she had consciously
tried to avoid paying taxes through planning her deductions and
investments carefully. This is no crime if you manage to comply
with the thousands of rules in the tax code, but it is considered
a deeply immoral thing to do by the general public. And it is an
indication of the individual’s egotism and anti-solidarity, especially
if rich.
Ms. Borelius,
a famous science journalist, was brought down by her former colleagues
through their detailed reports on her and her family’s financial
status and behavior. It took only eight days to create a public
demand for her resignation too strong to handle. She asked the Prime
Minister, Mr. Reinfeldt, to be resigned and was so on October 14.
More ministers
were of course investigated by the media, and they were especially
tough on Ms. Cecilia Stegö Chilò, minister of culture
and former CEO of libertarian-conservative think tank Timbro.
She was very resolutely opposed as minister, long before the cultural
politics of the new government was presented, by the left-wing intelligentsia
and cultural elite. Part of the reason was her former opposition
to public service television and radio – as well as her principled
approach to state subsidies of culture.
The cultural
establishment claimed Ms. Stegö Chilò was the end: her
ministry would mean the "death of the humanities, the death
of art." Some would not go as far but instead stated that it
would take decades to revive culture when her time as minister had
ended.
It was soon
discovered that Ms. Stegö Chilò had not paid the "television
license" for 16 years. The "license" is a special
kind of tax levied on the ownership of devices with the capability
to receive television broadcasts, a scheme intended to finance state
television and radio channels. The illegality of not paying taxes
was not the real issue here; it was overshadowed by the fact that
the minister of culture consciously did not support public service
programming neither theoretically nor financially.
Paying the
license for all the 16 years just before accepting the position
as minister did not save Ms. Stegö Chilò. She was forced
to resign after only ten days.
This was not,
however, the end of the scandals of this government. It was discovered
by journalists that more ministers in the new government had not
paid the license and that they had neglected to do so for many years.
The minister of integration (of immigrants), Tobias Billström,
had not paid it for ten years. He has so far managed to cling to
his post after having quickly paid the license and publicly declared
it was but a case of civil disobedience from his ignorant youth
that had "lived on" without him noticing. Billström,
along with 6,500 other people (among which were a large number of
members of parliament and local politicians), registered for and
paid the television license that week.
Billström
was saved partly thanks to the Prime Minister stating his full support
for the minister of integration, but also because the media found
another and much more interesting scandal. The minister of finance,
Anders E. Borg, had had his neighbor’s daughter baby-sit the children
repeatedly. The former baby-sitter came forward in one of the largest
newspapers, saying she was paid SEK11,500 (approximately $1,600)
by Mr. Borg and his wife that one year. Borg claims he did not pay
more than SEK10,000.
The SEK1,500
($200) may seem unimportant, but isn’t. In fact, this amount is
the core of this "scoop." The law states that you have
to report any purchase of services, unless from a registered company,
where the total amount of services exceeds SEK10,000 in one year.
Since Mr. Borg did not report to the authorities, whether he paid
SEK11,500 or SEK10,000 is most important (if you care about these
things, that is).
It seems Borg,
just like Billström, manages to stay put as minister. But who
knows for how long? All this happened in just the first two weeks
of this newly elected government. These are interesting times.
October
21, 2006
Per Bylund [send him mail]
works as a business consultant in Sweden, in preparation for PhD
studies. He is the founder of Anarchism.net.
Visit his website.
Copyright
© 2006 LewRockwell.com
Per
Bylund Archives
|