A Triumph for Traditionalists
by
Patrick
J. Buchanan
by
Patrick J. Buchanan
DIGG THIS
Elevated to
the papacy at 78, Benedict XVI will take no action greater in significance
for the Catholic Church than his motu proprio declaring that
the Latin Mass must be said in every diocese – on the request of
the faithful. Dissenting bishops must comply.
"What earlier
generations held as sacred remains sacred and great for us, too,"
said the Holy Father in his apostolic letter, as he authorized the
universal use of the sole official version of the mass allowed in
the four centuries between the Council of Trent and Vatican II.
To which
many Catholics will respond: "Alleluia! Alleluia!"
And so
the pope has come full circle. At Vatican II, the future Joseph
Cardinal Ratzinger, head of the Holy Office for the Defense of the
Faith under John Paul II, went about in coat and tie and was seen
as a radical reformer and modernist theologian in the mold of his
friend Hans Kung.
Now, Kung
is silent, Ratzinger is pope, and the Latin Mass, which had fallen
into disuse with the introduction of the new rite in 1970, is back.
Why? Because
the Holy Father knows the solemnity, mystery and beauty of the Latin
Mass hold magnetic appeal, not only for the older faithful but the
searching young. And he acted to advance a reconciliation with traditionalists
out of communion with the Holy See, including the 600,000 followers
of the late Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, excommunicated in 1988,
who belong to his Society of Saint Pius X.
The current
head of SSPX, Bishop Bernard Fellay, has welcomed papal restoration
of the Latin Mass. But he has called it a first step toward addressing
all doctrinal disputes dating to Vatican II. Among these are the
issues of ecumenism and religious liberty. If the true church is
one, holy, catholic and apostolic, then not all churches are equal.
Ever since
Pope John Paul II issued his 1988 indult, which authorized, but
did not require, bishops to allow the Latin Mass, the number of
Catholics requesting the Tridentine rite – and the number attending
– has steadily grown. Indeed, it was the stubborn resistance of
some bishops to allow the Latin Mass to be said that brought a rising
chorus of pleas to Rome from the faithful for the pope to overrule
a recalcitrant hierarchy and order them to permit the old mass.
And there
are other reasons Benedict XVI acted.
The introduction
of the new mass has been attended by a raft of liturgical innovations
by freelancing priests that are transparently heretical. And the
years since Vatican II and the introduction of the new mass have
been marked by a crisis of faith in Europe and the United States.
Churches
have closed. Faithful have fallen away, or converted to other faiths.
Congregations have dwindled. Convents have emptied out. Vocations
are a fraction of what they once were. Belief in the creedal truths
of Catholicism is not what it was in the years before Vatican II
– the halcyon days of the great pope and future St. Pius XII.
One cannot
know the effect of Pope Benedict's decision. But the ferocity with
which it was fought suggests some bishops are aware of the power
of the old Latin Mass and the appeal of its mystery and solemnity
to the young.
Pope Benedict,
raised Catholic in Nazi Germany, once a reformer, but shaken by
the events of 1968 and the social, cultural and moral revolution
that followed, seems to have concluded that the Catholic Church's
apertura a sinistra, its opening to the left, has run its
course theologically, liturgically and morally, and failed. Restored
tradition can do no harm, and may offer hope for the revival of
a faith that is in its deepest crisis since the Reformation.
Indeed,
the term "Tridentine Mass" is derived from the Latin name, Tridentum,
of the city in which it was declared the official mass of Roman
Catholicism. And the Council of Trent was the first major step in
the Counter-Reformation.
Yet the
Holy Father could not make everyone happy.
Liberal
European bishops were said to have fought restoration of the Latin
Mass. And, according to The New York Times, Abe Foxman, resident
theologian at the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith, is about
to anathematize the whole lot of us. Declared Abe, speaking ex cathedra
for ADL:
"We are
extremely disappointed and deeply offended that nearly 40 years
after the Vatican rightly removed insulting anti-Jewish language
from the Good Friday Mass, that it would now permit Catholics
to utter such hurtful and insulting words by praying for Jews
to be converted."
What is
Abe talking about?
Does he
not know that Catholics are required to pray for the conversion
of all peoples to Catholicism and Christ? Who duped Abe into thinking
this requirement was suspended by Vatican II?
Indeed,
if one believes, as devout Catholics do, that Christ and his Church
hold the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven, it would be anti-Semitic
not to pray for the conversion of the Jews. Even Abe.
July
11, 2007
Patrick
J. Buchanan [send
him mail] is co-founder and editor of The
American Conservative. He is also the author of seven books,
including Where
the Right Went Wrong, and A
Republic Not An Empire.
Copyright
© 2007 Creators Syndicate
Patrick
J. Buchanan Archives
|