Mr. Bush: Meet Walter Jones
by
Patrick
J. Buchanan
by
Patrick J. Buchanan
DIGG THIS
America is
four years into a bloody debacle in Iraq not merely because Bush
and Cheney marched us in, or simply because neocon propagandists
lied about Saddam's nuclear program and WMDs, and Iraqi ties to
al-Qaida, anthrax attacks and 9-11.
We are
there because a Democratic Senate voted to give Bush a blank check
for war. Democrats in October 2002 wanted the war vote behind them
so they could go home and campaign as pro-war patriots.
And because
they did, 3,000 Americans are dead, 25,000 are wounded, perhaps
100,000 Iraqis have lost their lives, 1.6 million have fled, $400
billion has been lost and America stands on the precipice of the
worst strategic defeat in her history.
Yet, Sens.
Clinton, Biden, Kerry and Edwards – all of whom voted to give Bush
his blank check – are now competing to succeed him. And how do they
justify what they did?
"If only
we had known then what we know now," they plead, "we would never
have voted for the war." They are thus confessing to dereliction
in the highest duty the Founding Fathers gave Congress. They voted
to cede to a president their power to take us to war.
Now they
wash their hands of it all and say, "It's Bush's War!"
And now
George Bush has another war in mind.
In his
Jan. 11 address, Bush said that to defend the "territorial integrity"
of Iraq, the United States must address "Iran and Syria."
"These
two regimes are allowing terrorists and insurgents to use their
territory to move in and out of Iraq. Iran is providing material
support for attacks on American troops. We will disrupt the attacks
on our forces. We will interrupt the flow of support from Iran and
Syria. And we will seek out and destroy the networks providing advanced
weaponry and training to our enemies in Iraq."
The city
sat bolt upright. If Bush was talking about Iranian agents inside
Iraq, he has no need of a second aircraft carrier in the Gulf, nor
for those Patriot missiles he is sending to our allies.
But does
Bush have the authority to take us to war against Iran?
On ABC
last Sunday, National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley, while denying
Bush intends to attack Iran, nonetheless did not deny Bush had the
authority to escalate the war – right into Iran.
George
Stephanopoulos: "So you don't believe you have the authority to
go into Iran?"
Stephen
Hadley: "I didn't say that. That is another issue. Any time you
have questions about crossing international borders, there are legal
questions."
Any doubt
how Attorney General Gonzales would come down on those "legal questions"?
Any doubt how the Supreme Court would rule?
Biden sputters
that should Bush attack Iran, a constitutional crisis would ensue.
I don't
believe it. If tomorrow Bush took out Iran's nuclear facilities,
would a Senate that lacks the courage to cut funds for an unpopular
war really impeach him for denying a nuclear capability to Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad? Bush's lawyers would make the same case Nixon made
for the 1970 "incursion" into Cambodia – and even a Nixon-hating
Democratic House did not dare to impeach him for that.
Bush's
contempt for Congress is manifest and, frankly, justified.
Asked if
Congress could stop him from surging 21,500 troops into Iraq, Bush
on "60 Minutes" brushed aside Congress as irrelevant.
"I fully
understand (the Congress) could try to stop me from doing it. But
I've made my decision. And we're going forward." Asked if he had
sole authority "to put the troops in there no matter what the Congress
wants to do," Bush replied, "In this situation I do, yeah."
Is Congress
then impotent, if it does not want war on Iran?
Enter Rep.
Walter Jones, Republican of North Carolina.
The
day after Bush's threat to Iran, Jones introduced a Joint Resolution,
"Concerning the Use of Military Force by the United States Against
Iran." Under HJR 14, "Absent a national emergency created by attack
by Iran, or a demonstrably imminent attack by Iran, upon the United
States, its territories, possessions or its armed forces, the president
shall consult with Congress, and receive specific authorization
pursuant to law from Congress, prior to initiating any use of force
on Iran."
Jones'
resolution further declares, "No provision of law enacted before
the date of the enactment of this joint resolution shall be construed
to authorize the use of military force by the United States against
Iran."
If
we are going to war on Iran, Jones is saying, we must follow the
Constitution and Congress must authorize it.
If Biden,
Kerry, Clinton and Obama refuse to sign on to the Jones resolution,
they will be silently conceding that Bush indeed does have the power
to start a war on Iran. And America should pay no further attention
to the Democrats' wailing about being misled on the Iraq war.
January
16, 2007
Patrick
J. Buchanan [send
him mail] is co-founder and editor of The
American Conservative. He is also the author of seven books,
including Where
the Right Went Wrong, and A
Republic Not An Empire.
Copyright
© 2007 Creators Syndicate
Patrick
J. Buchanan Archives
|