What Are We Up To In Ukraine?
by
Patrick
J. Buchanan
by
Patrick J. Buchanan
In
the 1940s, as Stalinists were seizing Czechoslovakia, ex-OSS agents
were running bags of money to Italy and France to ensure the Communists
were defeated in national elections.
In
the 1950s, using a rent-a-mob, the CIA effected the ouster of an
anti-American regime in Iran and the overthrow of Arbenz in Guatemala.
In the 1980s, after Solidarity was crushed by Gen. Jaruzelski, Ronald
Reagan secretly aided the Polish resistance.
Many
of us applauded these Cold War means, as we believed that the ends
security of the West and survival of freedom justified
them.
But
when news broke that South Africa was maneuvering to buy the Washington
Star in the 1980s, this city was ablaze with indignation. How dare
they seek to corrupt American media! In the 1990s, when China was
caught using cutouts to funnel cash to the Clinton campaign, we
were full of righteous rage.
Given
this history, several questions arise. Are we today using Cold War
tactics in a post-Cold War era? Are we guilty of the same gross
interference in the internal affairs of Ukraine, trying to fix their
election, we would consider outrageous and criminal if done to us?
Are
we Americans hypocrites of global democracy?
Consider
what we have apparently been up to in Ukraine.
According
to the Guardian and other sources, NED the National Endowment
for Democracy and USAid, Freedom House, the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace and George Soros' Open Society Institute
all pumped money or sent agents into Kiev to defeat the government-backed
Viktor Yanukovich and elect Viktor Yushchenko as president. Allegedly
in on the scheme is the supposedly objective and neutral Organization
for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
The
Guardian's Jonathan Steele describes how we put the fix in:
"Yushchenko
got the Western nod, and floods of money poured in to groups which
support him, ranging from the youth organization, Pora, to various
opposition websites. More provocatively, the U.S. and other Western
embassies paid for exit polls ..."
Those
polls showed Yushchenko winning by 11, demoralizing the opposition
and convincing most Ukrainians he was the next president.
But,
on Election Day, Yushchenko, like Kerry, lost by three, as the populous
eastern Ukraine delivered the same huge margins for favorite son
Yanukovich as did western Ukraine for Yushchenko.
Into
the streets came scores of thousands of demonstrators, howling fraud
and demanding that Yushchenko be inaugurated. Engaging in civil
disobedience, and backed by the West, the crowds intimidated parliament,
President Kuchma and the judiciary into declaring the election invalid.
John
Laughland writes in the Guardian of the double standard our
media employ: "Enormous rallies have been held in Kiev in support
of the prime minister, Viktor Yanukovich, but they are not shown
on our TV screen. ... Yanukovich supporters are denigrated as having
been 'bussed in.' The demonstrators in favor of Yushchenko have
laser lights, plasma screens, sophisticated sound systems, rock
concerts, tents to camp in and huge quantities of orange clothing;
yet we happily dupe ourselves that they are spontaneous."
Laughland
is saying the Yushchenko demonstrations may be as phony as that
U.S-Albanian war in the Dustin Hoffman-Robert DeNiro film Wag
the Dog. He calls Pora "an organization created and financed
by Washington," like Otpor and Kmara, which were used in Serbia
and Georgia to oust leaders Washington wished to be rid of. Pora's
symbol, writes Laughland, depicts "a jackboot crushing a beetle."
If
the United States has indeed been interfering in Ukraine to swing
the election of a president who will tilt to NATO, against Moscow,
we are, as Steele writes, "playing with fire."
"Not
only is (Ukraine) geographically and culturally divided a
recipe for partition or even civil war it is also an important
neighbor of Russia. ... Ukraine has been turned into a geostrategic
matter not by Moscow, but by the U.S., which refuses to abandon
the Cold War policy of encircling Moscow and seeking to pull every
former Soviet republic to its side."
Our
most critical relationship on earth is with the world's other great
nuclear power, Russia, a nation suffering depopulation, loss of
empire, breakup of its country and a terror war. That relationship
is far more important to us than who rules in Kiev.
For
us to imperil it by using our perfected technique of the "post-modern
coup" as we did in Serbia and Georgia and failed to do in
Belarus to elect American vassals in Russia's backyard, even
in former Soviet republics, seems an act of imperial arrogance and
blind stupidity.
Congress
should investigate NED and any organization that used clandestine
cash or agents to fix the Ukrainian election, as the U.S. media
appear to have gone into the tank for global democracy, as they
did for war in Iraq.
December
5, 2004
Patrick
J. Buchanan [send
him mail], former presidential candidate and White House aide,
is editor of The American
Conservative and the author of eight books, including A
Republic Not An Empire and the upcoming Where
the Right Went Wrong.
Copyright
© 2004 Creators Syndicate
Patrick
J. Buchanan Archives
|