Every
Man Needs a Theory
by
Bill Bonner
by Bill Bonner
"What can be
avoided / whose end is purposed by the mighty gods?" asked Julius
Caesar, before he was stabbed dead on the Ides of March.
Despite the
omens, no history was made yesterday – at least, not in U.S. financial
markets. At the close of the day, prices were not far from where
they were when the first rays of sun struck Manhattan.
But, if we
are right about the way the world works, history kept bumping and
grinding anyway, perhaps in secret...grinding all human conceits
exceedingly fine and exceedingly sure. Who knows what ends are purposed
by the mighty gods? But, who doubts that they can be avoided?
Today, dear
reader, we offer what you might call a General Theory of Grinding.
We begin by insisting that every man needs a theory as much as he
needs a pair of pants – perhaps more. Without it, he is ridiculous
or at least semi-functional. All we humans have to judge the world
around us are our eyes and ears, but what do these senses pick up?
They pick up a rush of color, light, sound – raw data.
Without a theory,
this "data" is meaningless. It is just "noise." We need theories
to interpret it and give it meaning. These theories transform the
rising edges of a woman's mouth into a smile and a growing complex
of bright red light into a double-decker bus headed for Waterloo
Station. How would we know what would happen if we stepped in front
of it? We have never done it before. We've never seen anyone do
it. Yet, we have a theory that tells us that if we position ourselves
in front of a moving bus, we will be crushed by it.
More on the
General Theory of Grinding below...
Among other
things, the gods are currently grinding down the boom in real estate,
support for the Iraq war, consumer incomes and spending power, the
U.S. balance sheet...and the empire itself.
The Mortgage
Bankers Association expects mortgage originations to drop off by
20% this year; it says refinancing should fall by 40%. Without easy
finance, consumers have less to spend. Yesterday brought news that
retail sales had fallen in February, for the first time in six months.
Why?
"Too many consumers
have been attracted to products by the seductive prospect of low
minimum payments that delay the day of reckoning, but often make
ultimate repayment of growing principal far more difficult."
Speaking was
U.S. Comptroller of the Currency John C. Dugan, and what he was
speaking of, specifically, was the way in which consumers took out
interest-only or negative amortization mortgages.
"In the last
two years, however," Dugan continued, "we have seen a spike in the
volume of payment-option ARMs which are no longer confined to well-heeled
borrowers who can clearly afford them. Increasingly, they are being
marketed as 'affordability products' to borrowers who appear to
be counting on the fixed period of exceptionally low minimum payments
– typically lasting the first five years of the loan – as the primary
way to afford the large mortgages necessary to buy homes in many
housing markets across the country."
We already
know what will happen. We see the signs before us. Foreclosures
are rising. Households which bought more house than they could really
afford are going broke. Consumer spending has become a little wobbly.
The expected
effects on the housing market itself are starting to show up. Sales
are down. Inventories are rising.
In California,
the housing boom has raised prices to the point where the median
wage earner in L.A. County can only afford one out of every 35 properties
on the market. We wonder who, then, will buy the other 34? Other
people are beginning to wonder, too. Transactions in January fell
24% from the year before.
Speaking of
prices, "I would expect a general decline of 5% to 10% throughout
the country, some areas 20%...and in areas where you have had heavy
speculation, you could have 30%," says Angelo R. Mozilo – a man
who ought to know. Mr. Mozilo is the CEO of the nation's largest
mortgage lender, Countrywide. While we have no reason to doubt Mozilo's
words on the subject, it is his actions we'd bet on. According to
Grant's Interest Rate Observer, Mozilo "has been a steady and heavy
seller of Countrywide common for two years."
We recall an
estimate reported in these epistles a few months ago. Fully 40%
of the job growth since 2001 is said to be the fruit of the housing
boom. If that is so – and if despite these new jobs, real wages
have gone down during this period – we can't help but wonder what
will happen to wages when the boom ends. It seems likely that they
will go down further. And, it seems likely that consumer spending
will fall, too. Is that when history starts up again?
Yes...or maybe
even sooner.
• Support for
the war in Iraq is deteriorating. A new poll shows two-thirds of
Americans already think the war was a "mistake." History is grinding
away, slowly but surely, at our war president.
When the war
was first announced, Americans were fully behind it, and suspicious
of anyone who wasn't. We lost a good number of dear readers because
they couldn't put up with our standoffish attitude to the war. One
wrote to say he wished U.S. bombers would drop a load on our Paris
office on their way to Baghdad!
But, we were
never really "against" the war. That suggests a degree of earnest
do-goodism of which we are incapable. We take the world as we find
it; we let the gods do their work. We only try to understand what
they are up to, not stop them. Maggie Thatcher said an attack against
Iraq was too "uncertain." She argued against British involvement.
The cynical French remembered Algeria; they wanted nothing to do
with it.
While we shared
many of their views, we saw the war as a historical necessity. Every
empire needs to find a way to look ridiculous; it has to lose its
pants, in other words, when the theory holding it up finally disintegrates.
Nature loathes a monopoly. A successful empire has a monopoly on
the use of organized force. Nature conspires against it, tries to
undermine it and eventually ruins it. Every great empire also needs
to take Baghdad at one time or another. The English took it. The
Mongols took it. The Romans took it several times. Why shouldn't
we?
Wouldn't that
be a good way to weaken the empire, too? It would cost a fortune,
stir up enemies, and tie up the imperial army in a futile campaign
against nobody of importance. If you wanted to destroy the U.S.
Empire, it would seem to be the perfect project. All nature needed
to accomplish her dirty plans was an American administration foolish
enough to undertake it. In Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld, she found
her stooges.
• Back to the
General Theory of Grinding...
Against the
theory that modern American democratic capitalism always makes things
better, we offer our own theory: Things don't get better at all.
Technology improves. Material living standards get better. But,
down in that old "rag and bone shop of the heart" – where central
bankers toil, politicians despoil, lovers and history grind away
– things remain same.
We hold this
truth to be self-evident: Everything degenerates, everything breaks
down and everything is born again to new life.
"Wait a minute,"
you say, "things are getting better."
We expect you
might toss the Great Crusades in our face, the Hundred Years' War,
or the Aztec butcheries.
"See, we don't
do things like that any more," you say. But, we offer this rebuttal:
Auschwitz, the 20th Century, the War on Terror!
Last night,
we read an account of the Soviets' advance on Berlin in World War
II. Was it much different from the Mongol invasion of the 13th century?
If there has been any progress in human affairs, dear reader, it
has been very slow, very slight and very fragile.
What we see
when we look around is a constant upwelling of institutions and
ideas, and then, a constant wearing away, erosion, and degradation
of them. That is history grinding away – churning, burning, turning
everything up and down, over and around. Stock prices rise – only
to fall again. Empires flourish – only to degenerate and make way
for a new empire. Currencies, companies, economies...all have their
moments of glory – and their moments of sorrow.
• Yesterday's
excursion to Paris did not go as planned. Your author stepped into
the apartment his wife had chosen and his face gave him away immediately.
It was dark. We looked out the window and saw only our own face
reflected in the glass of a similar apartment building right across
the narrow street.
"You don't
like it," said Elizabeth.
"I didn't say
I didn't like it. It's fine, really," we replied.
"You don't
have to say anything. You're no good at poker and no good at pretending,"
responded Elizabeth.
Elizabeth has
decided to buy an apartment in Paris. We did the math. It doesn't
seem to make sense. We can rent a nice apartment for half as much
as we pay in London. And the same apartment that we can rent for
$5,000 costs more than $1 million – not to mention another couple
hundred grand for a new kitchen and new bathrooms.
"Why put in
a new kitchen?" we wanted to know. "This one looks perfectly fine.
And what's wrong with the bathrooms?"
Elizabeth
looked at the young woman who was showing the apartment to us. Both
of them rolled their eyes. Some instinct seems to tell women when
they need new bathrooms and new kitchens; it was not evident to
us.
And,
some instinct seems to lead them to want to buy an apartment in
the first place. If we were able to earn even a modest return on
the money we would otherwise use to buy an apartment, we'd have
enough income to pay the rent and have a little left over to go
out to dinner. Buying doesn't seem to make sense.
"I'm tired
of paying rent," said Elizabeth. "Besides, I want to be able to
fix it up in my own way."
She is still
looking.
March
16, 2006
Bill
Bonner [send
him mail] is the author, with Addison Wiggin, of Financial
Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of The 21st
Century and
Empire of Debt: The Rise Of An Epic Financial Crisis.
Copyright
© 2006 Bill Bonner
Bill
Bonner Archives
|