‘One-Point-One Percent!’
by
Bill Bonner
by Bill Bonner
Dr. Kurt Richebächer
slammed his hand down on the table. Not many people got excited
by Friday's U.S. GDP growth figure; Dr. Richebächer was the
exception. We met with him in Paris after our radio show. Even before
the coffee came, he had enquired about the GDP number. We checked
our usual sources. Then, when the news came to him he said, "I knew
it. They cheat...they rig up the calculations and still they can't
come up with a decent number. The recovery has totally failed. This
latest number is just more evidence."
The recovery
is as phony as the slump that came before it. During the recession,
Americans refused to cut back. Now, they have nothing to recover
from.
But they have
nothing to recover with, either. No savings, and no new income.
Unlike previous recoveries, this one saw few new jobs added. And
those that have been added, have brought little to consumers' incomes.
The typical household has less money to spend now than it did two
years ago.
"The whole
thing is incredible," said Dr. Richebächer. "I mean the 'savings
glut,' and nonsense like that. It's the kind of thing you'd expect
from a Third World country, but not from America.
"You know what
amazes me most is that Americans have come to believe that consequences
no longer exist. They think they can do whatever they want for as
long as they want...and nothing will ever go wrong."
This is probably
the first generation of Americans to believe that savings don't
matter. It is also the first generation to believe that America
doesn't really need to make anything; it can buy what it needs from
abroad. But where will it get the money?
"That's the
thing," Dr. Richebächer went on. "They think the bubble economy
will never end, but bubbles always end. This one will end, too.
And there will be consequences, and not very pleasant ones. This
is not something the Fed can manage.
"And nowhere
in America do you hear any serious discussion of the real problems
involved. When I first started talking to American economists, it
was back in the 1960s. We had problems back then. We thought we
had problems, at least. But when I look back I realize that we had
no problems that come anywhere close to the problems we face today.
These problems, on an international scale, never existed before
at least not in this size. And no one talks about them. "
Somehow, the
economics profession seems to have taken leave of its senses.
We had just
had an illustration earlier in the day. The two economists confronting
us at Radio BFN were sure that "international cooperation"
would surmount any difficulties.
"The fact is,
the world's central banks coordinate much better today than they
used to," said one, gravely. "We can be sure that this international
cooperation will continue and will help us overcome any rough patches
we may hit."
We could barely
contain ourselves:
"What has international
cooperation got to do with it? The problem lies at the heart of
the U.S. economy, where people spend more than they earn. Someday,
perhaps soon, they will be forced to spend less. Then what? The
monetary authorities can cooperate all they want. What are they
going to do...reduce the price of gasoline? Cut U.S. taxes? Stop
the war in Iraq? All they can do is the very thing that will do
the most damage...they can conspire to give the American consumer
what he needs least: more credit."
"Yeah...it
is unbelievable," said the Good Doctor. "This kind of international
cooperation is going to ruin everybody."
According to
Dr. Richebächer, our nation's "recovery" is largely a matter
of the short-term transference of money from people's home equity,
secured and unsecured loans and credit cards into consumer-level
retail purchases into the hands of financial institutions or the
risky realm of speculative investment.
We appreciate
irony... paradox... it's what makes the study of modern economics
so appealing. Two exhibits come from Addison in Baltimore this morning:
"Next door
to our Daily Reckoning offices on St. Paul Street sits Red
Emma's, a coffee shop run by an anarchist collective. This morning,
we went to the bookstore for a fresh batch of Mexican 'fair trade'
coffees. On the way back, we saw the gentleman who served us the
brew a bespectacled mid-fiftyish would-be revolutionary who sports
a beard in the style of Lenin get behind the wheel of a 500 series
Mercedes... the big one that looks like it should be on a battlefield."
And
this:
"Joe Scarborough,
from MSNBC's Scarborough Country, was overheard this weekend trying
to put America's empire of debt into perspective. We paraphrase:
"'America's
debt is so large that if you earned a million dollars a year, every
year, going all the way back to the year of Jesus' birth, you still
wouldn't have enough money to cover the nation's financial obligation.
"We did the
numbers ourselves. While it puts the number into perspective, it's
a stupid stat. The total is $2,010 or $2,012 billion (depending
on where you get your information), less than a quarter of the gaping
hole at the center of the nation's balance sheet."
From
the Financial Times:
"But the evidence
from history suggests that we are still in a bear market.
"Research by
Abhijit Chakraborti of JP Morgan on stock market corrections (where
the S&P 500 falls by at least 10 per cent) provides more gloomy
reading. He believes a 'momentous' market correction is on its way,
and that earnings disappointments will provide the final necessary
catalyst.
"On his reading,
another catalyst is already in place. Of the last 10 corrections,
seven occurred when interest rates were rising, or when the Fed
had just finished tightening.
"Historically
the market declines badly at the end of a Fed tightening cycle.
And almost everyone expects the Fed to stop tightening sometime
this year.
"So it looks
like we can expect the directionless choppiness of January to continue
a while longer. The bears are still in charge."
Well, at least
someone is in charge. For a while there we thought stock prices
went on their own merry way without asking anyone's say-so. Now,
we know they have to answer to the bears.
What do the
bears say?
They say prices
have to go down, and keep going down until stocks are too cheap.
Why do they
say that?
We don't know.
They just always do. Like everything else in nature, they seem to
have some swing to them. Up and down...back and forth...day and
night...winter and summer ...life and death...yin and yang...good
and evil...Cheech and Chong.
Markets
tend to go in long cycles, with many mini-cycles along the way.
We don't try to guess about what will happen in those mini-cycles;
they come and go too fast. We just try to figure out the major trend.
Looking back
at the last century, we see a long bull market leading up to the
crash of '29. An investor could have tried to catch the swells and
eddies in the choppy markets of the '30s and '40s. There were some
huge run-ups during that period. But the tide was running out. He
would have had to contend with the Great Depression, and then World
War II.
And if he held
on through all these calamities, by '49, 20 years after the market
broke, he would still have been far below where he began. Then,
a new bull market got underway. Here, too, he might have made some
money betting against the market there were plenty of riptides
and backwashes. But the water was rising. He would have been better
off buying stocks in 1949 and holding on for the next 20 years.
The first crack
came in 1966. Then, the market seemed to recover, and broke again
in 1968. And then it was down, down, down...for another 14 years.
The losses were worse than they appeared, because inflation was
taking down the dollar at the same time. An investor could trick
himself by noticing that his stock was still at $50...as it had
been in 1966. But the dollar of 1982 was not the same as the dollar
of '68. It would have taken 10 times as many to buy an ounce of
gold, for example.
But then came
the Reagan years...the Bush years...the Clinton years...and the
other Bush years. Paul Volcker, the hero of the war against inflation,
actually did what central bankers are supposed to do: he closed
the bar, just before the party got out of hand.
Under
pressure from Volcker, inflation peaked out at the same time as
Saturday Night Fever. Then, the stage was set for a new, long period
of rising asset prices, and falling interest rates, which lasted
for nearly 20 years, too from 1982 until 2000. It made such an
impression on people that they believed it was eternal, rather than
cyclical. They would take any guff you gave them, if it helped explain
why this trend would last forever.
Even
now, six years later, they still don't believe it's over even
though stocks have not recovered, but then, stocks haven't really
broken down either except for those on the Nasdaq. So, the average
investor is still a believer, and maybe this year...he'll even be
proven "right."
January
31, 2006
Bill
Bonner [send
him mail] is the author, with Addison Wiggin, of Financial
Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression of The 21st
Century and
Empire of Debt: The Rise Of An Epic Financial Crisis.
Copyright
© 2006 Bill Bonner
Bill
Bonner Archives
|