Chertoff’s
Blurt-Off
by
Becky Akers
by Becky Akers
DIGG THIS
It’s fitting
that the bureaucrat in charge of a fake war against
fake weapons touts his cowardly "gut feeling" to scare
up support.
Michael Chertoff,
the craven and creepy Secretary of the cornball Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), "feels" that "we are entering a period
this summer of increased risk..." Have squadrons of Al Qaeda
bombers been sighted over the Atlantic, heading our way? No. Is
a Moslem coalition reconnoitering a beachhead to land an army on
our shores? Hardly. Has Al Qaeda exchanged its caves and box-cutters
for tanks and M16A2 rifles? Nope. Yet Chertoff shudders, "We
could easily be attacked." Suck it up there, Mikey. We’re the
superpower policing and paying off most of the Arab world, remember?
Chertoff nattered
this nonsense last week when he delivered "an unusually blunt
and frank assessment of America's terror threat level" – yeah,
right – to the gullible toadies comprising the
Chicago Tribune’s editorial board. However preposterous
Chertoff’s claims, the editors veered towards skepticism only once:
they noted that his "comments come as the Bush administration
faces political and business opposition over its immigration and
border policies that have security implications."
Tellingly,
the DHS links to the
Tribune’s interview on its website. Its sub-bureaucracy,
the Transportation Security
Administration (TSA), went further and posted the whole sorry
mess (since reduced to a link as well). Nor is this the only article
so honored: the TSA regularly publicizes those that recycle its
press releases. Current examples include the Atlanta
Journal Constitution’s whitewash of the agency’s warrantless
searches and a puff piece from the Tulsa
World ("Air Security TSA Strives to be Nimble: Ban
on complacency"). Americans used to call this "propaganda."
Meanwhile,
Chertoff walked a tightrope at the Trib. On the one hand,
he must be vague lest his lies catch up with him. And so he sees
no " specific threat," just an "increased vulnerability."
I’d have to agree: credulous Americans are now even more vulnerable
to government’s manipulation and tyranny. On the other hand, demagoguery
works best when it isn’t ambiguous. So Chertoff mixed a strange
brew of insinuations, "recent al-Qaeda statements, intelligence
[reports] he did not disclose," and the now notorious "gut
feeling." Basically, we’ll restrict more liberties, snuff more
lives, and spend more billions because this jerk’s got gas.
Collaborating
with his hot air were others of Leviathan’s
lickspittles. As the Tribune put it, "ABC News also
reported that ‘new intelligence suggests a small al-Qaeda cell is
on its way to the United States, or may already be here.’"
Ah, but no Al Qaeda cell is too small to serve neo-con purposes.
Imagine how eagerly the sheeple will forfeit their remaining liberties
to ferret out those few phantoms. "There have been reports
already that suggest intelligence warnings at a similar level to
the summer before Sept. 11, 2001 and that al-Qaeda may be mobilizing...
Chertoff added[,] ‘The intent to attack us remains as strong as
it was on Sept. 10, 2001.’" Hmmm. Could America’s slaughter
of 665,000
Iraqis have anything to do with that?
You may be
wondering how many terrorists it takes to twist Chertoff’s knickers
so tight his gut starts burbling. It’s hard to say because no one
knows Al Qaeda’s numbers for sure. And I’ll bet the Feds aren’t
working overtime to count since they play the uncertainty to their
advantage: though the South Asia Analysis Group calculates the group’s
membership at
500 to 600, the Feds inflate that to 20,000
to 60,000. These charlatans set your tax rates, too.
Chertoff likes
his propaganda explicit and emphatic, by gum: "Americans must
soon decide between enduring greater inconvenience and costs or
allowing terrorists easier access to the borders. [Chertoff] warned
against increasing resistence [sic] to security measures
based on comfort and self-centered motives. ‘If you get to complacency
then I guarantee you we will lose the race with the terrorists,’
he said." Somebody tell this goofball that we’ve already lost
it. He and his henchmen have destroyed far more folks and freedom
than have all the terrorists, now or ever, put together.
Yet we’re supposed
to fear the terrorists, not the Feds. And what does Chertoff plug
as our best protection? Yep: more surveillance. "Chertoff cited
Chicago's technologically savvy police department and its use of
street-corner, blue-lighted cameras as a blueprint for strong homeland
security. ‘I think the use of cameras here and other technologies
is a model for the country,’ he said." Nor is Chertoff’s police
state for the faint of heart. "‘We are going to do more law
enforcement actions [against immigrants],’ he said. Conceding the
raids are ‘going to be ugly’ and tear parents from their children
who wonder why they have not returned from work, Chertoff warned:
‘the consequences are going to be tough from an economic and humanitarian
standpoint.’" Ironically heartless words from the
grandson of Russian immigrants.
This isn’t
Chertoff’s first foray into irony or barbarity. A few months ago,
he sneered, "We are at war with a global movement and ideology
whose members seek to advance totalitarian aims through terrorism."
Well, after all, Mike, not every totalitarian has a Department of
Homeland Security at his disposal.
And, hey, next
time your gut grumbles, try some Bean-o.
July
16, 2007
Becky
Akers [send her mail]
writes primarily about the American Revolution.
Copyright
© 2007 LewRockwell.com
Becky
Akers Archives
|