Parents Must Assert Rights Over School Authorities

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare

“How
often does your 6th-grade daughter have oral sex?”

If
the question offends you, then talk to the school
officials at Shrewsbury, Mass
. But don’t expect a sympathetic response.

When
Mark Fisher protested quizzing his 12-year-old daughter about oral sex (among
other topics), the school authorities asserted their right to gather such information
without his consent.

The
questionnaire is not limited to Massachusetts; it is nationwide. And the ‘problem’
is not the gathering of information but the denial of parental rights and reasonable
concerns.

The
Shrewsbury questionnaire is part of The
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System
(YRBSS) that was established in 1990
by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to monitor youth behaviors
that influence health.

The
CDC website offers a 22-page
version
of the YRBS, which consists of 87 questions. Seven questions address
sexual behavior.
For example, the posted questionnaire asks, “How old were you when you had sexual
intercourse for the first time?” And, was a condom used?

Past
this point, the facts become confused. For one thing, there is no mention of oral
sex on the CDC site. Nevertheless, each school district selected to participate
in the YRBS is able to add or subtract questions.

Given
that Shrewsbury has refused to release its version of the questionnaire, parents
quite reasonably suspect the worst. Without disclosure of the survey to parents
or the public, Fisher’s
claim
that students are asked to identify themselves as heterosexual, gay
or bisexual stands.

For
another thing, the national YRBS claims to report upon student in the 9th through
12th grades. Fisher’s daughter is in the 6th grade, where students are typically
11 or 12 years old. However, other reports – from Planned
Parenthood
, for example – tend to confirm that 6th graders are being
surveyed. In Shrewsbury students in grades 6, 8, 9 and 11 took part.

Without
parental oversight and with school authorities unwilling to disclose questionnaires,
no one really knows what information is being gathered.

Or
rather, from the posted form, some things are clear. School authorities wish to
know if parents have committed an illegal action.

Question
10: “During the past 30 days, how many times did you ride in a car or other vehicle
driven by someone who had been drinking alcohol?”

Authorities
also wish to know if your child has committed an illegal act.

Question
45: “How old were you when you tried marijuana for the first time?”

The
posted form admonishes, “DO NOT write your name on this survey. The answers you
give will be kept private.” But government information is notoriously non-private
and teachers are easily able to identify respondents.

Moreover,
confidentiality tends to erode easily when issues of child endangerment and criminal
conduct are raised. (Does anyone believe that a child who circles “6 or more times”
for Question 14 – “During the past 30 days, on how many days did you carry
a weapon such as a gun, knife, or club on school property?” – will not have
his or her file tagged?)

Nevertheless,
the crux of the matter is not whether information on 11-year-olds will be kept
private. It is: Does the government have a right to side-step parental consent
and collect such information about children of any age without parental permission?
(By “such information” I mean highly personal data and/or data that could possibly
lead to criminal prosecution.)

That
is what Fisher is demanding of the Massachusetts’ Department of Education: active
parental involvement. At this point, state law requires parents to explicitly
exempt their children from programs involving sexuality. Fisher is fighting for
a bill that requires parental permission before children are included.

Explicit
permission is particularly important in situations where parents seem to be –
in Fisher’s words – “kept in the dark.”

School
committee President Deborah Peeples reportedly explained that parents are permitted
to view the survey but they are not allowed to take a copy home. Why? “It might
be misinterpreted or misunderstood or they could use it to direct their children’s
responses,” Peeples said.

In
short, parents might discuss the sexual (and other) topics with their children.

Clearly,
the school does not think such discussion is appropriate; conversation about the
sexual survey is not appropriate between parent and children but should remain
between government and child.

What
can concerned parents do?

My
immediate solution is to remove your child from the public school system and homeschool,
if possible. (The long-term solution is to privatize education.)

If
you are unable to do so, then you should aggressively demand to see every survey
and government form your child is filling out. YRBSS is a nationwide survey, conducted
every two years. These and other forms may follow your child for the rest of his
or her life.

Do
not believe that authorities, under the promise of privacy, will take no note
if your child confesses to experimenting with drugs – Questions
44 to 56
. Tell your children to never incriminate themselves.

Do
not willingly give your money to schools that deny parental rights. On June 9,
Shrewsbury voters overwhelmingly defeated
a $1.5 million tax increase that would have boosted finances to school programs.
Although school funding measures are almost always defeated for financial reasons,
use the occasion of a vote to voice your discontent.

What
happens to your children matters. Be nosy about the forms they fill out; demand
to review the information officials want; when in doubt, refuse permission; know
the content of school programs.

Be
a nuisance. Be bossy. Be a genuine pain in the tuckus. In short, be a parent.
That’s what your child needs.

June
23, 2005

Wendy
McElroy [send her mail] is the editor
of ifeminists.com and a research fellow
for The Independent Institute in Oakland,
Calif. She is the author and editor of many books and articles, including the
new book, Liberty
for Women: Freedom and Feminism in the 21st Century

(Ivan R. Dee/Independent Institute, 2002).

Wendy
McElroy Archives

Email Print
FacebookTwitterShare