Should the US Always Veto Security Council Resolutions? No.

From: TH Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 11:34 PM To: wblock@loyno.edu Subject: Article – The US Abstains… Dr Block, Another libertarian-style approach is to act as an obstructionist. If libertarians believe in the NAP (as I do), then they should encourage (not force) non-aggression whenever possible. As the Security Council exists for the sole purpose of authorizing aggression (in one form or another), then a principled libertarian approach would be to always veto Security Council resolutions, no matter what the subject. This would not prevent aggression on the part of any nation, but it would have the effect of denying … Continue reading Should the US Always Veto Security Council Resolutions? No.