Re the Kelo brouhaha: The Free Radical has a post, Kinsella and Kelo. Daniel Franke writes: Kinsella bases his argument upon a refutation of the long-standing doctrine of incorporation, which holds that the constitutional protections guaranteed to the people at the federal level are also binding upon the states. His case here, which takes a strictly legal rather than philosophical perspective, is persuasive. Well, that’s my main point. That, and that that federalism is a useful way to limit the central state, and therefore worth preserving and fighting for. However, Kinsella goes on to assert that libertarians should actually welcome … Continue reading The Free Radical on Kelo