In reading Max Boot’s “review” of Tom Woods’ book, it was interesting to see just how this guy tries to argue. I always was taught that effective arguing meant that one did not revert to the various informal fallacies, but instead dealt with the facts at hand. Boot, however, starts with insults, continues with insults, and ends with insults. It is sad to see him describe a Tom Woods that I never have known. A few days after the 9/11 attacks, Boot wrote an article for the Wall (War) Street Journal editorial page in which he declared that 9/11 would … Continue reading The Evil Max Boot