Masks, Part IV

Dear Charles:

 

The burden of proof, properly, always rests with the plaintiff, with he who wants to change property titles, etc.

Best regards,

Walter

From: C R Sebrell

Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 9:38 AM

To: [email protected]

Subject: Masks and such

Dear Dr Block

Have read the “mask” series.  What keeps coming to my mind, and admittedly has lo‘ these past 9 months, is that no one has the right to use coercion to infect another whether with our without a mask.  No one, to my knowledge on Lew’s sight has advocated using coercion to infect as part of mask mandate.

What is the legal recourse if I infect you and you suffer from that?  What is the recourse if I inject you with a liquid that causes you harm?  I would start with how it came to be.  I infected you not meaning to at all.  However, injection we’ll agree includes specific action and interaction.

If I contend I am not infected, nor able to infect another, must I prove that at every turn?  How?  Prove a negative?  By who’s authority must that be done?  How?

If you contend I might be infected, or able to infect another, is that sufficient for the use of coercion?

Just a few thoughts that came to mind while reading the “mask” series.

Charles Sebrell

Naples, FL

Share

5:30 am on December 25, 2020