From: R Sent: Friday, June 15, 2018 3:05 PM To: walter block Subject: Walter: I have one question: the following is, I think, a fair summary of Hoppe’s argument (one accepted by both you and Murray). Argumentation ethics argues the non-aggression principle is a presupposition of argumentation and so cannot be rationally denied in discourse. while it is certainly better than evoking natural rights, which are a total myth that cannot be demonstrated to exist, why do you think it provides a foundation for libertarianism? it seems to me that at best, it says that NAP can’t be rejected in … Continue reading Hoppe’s Argument From Argument