article-single

Are WHO and WEF Terrorist Organizations and National Security Threats?

In 1946 CS Lewis wrote the book called That Hideous Strength where twisted transhumanists were trying to live forever and merge people with machines and forever change what it means to be human. This sounds a bit familiar. In this story the transhumanists had a severed head that they were artificially keeping alive. When communicating with the head they thought they were speaking to the artificial intelligence when they were in fact being guided by what could best be described as fallen angels or demonic entities. It is unclear whether our globalist antagonists are guided by dark entities or are just simply evil for the sake of being evil.

I recently presented a resolution at my local county Republican Party Executive Committee declaring WHO and WEF terrorist organizations and national security threats. Unfortunately, the meeting was about to end and I accepted a watered down amendment that at least maintained that they are national security threats. It was either that or let the clock run out. I will bring up the resolution again in January when we have a new board. We also passed a resolution calling for the state to kick out federal agents operating in Florida. I may post an article about this meeting and the shenanigans at a later date. Back to the issue at hand.

Let’s take a look at this proposition that WHO and WEF are terrorist organizations and national security threats. I think a national security threat is self explanatory, still, let’s examine a definition provided in a white paper by The Heritage Foundation.

National Securitya nation’s possession of control of its sovereignty and

destiny

This definition seems prudent. The essence of national security entails autonomy, self government. Outside of the strict preservation of life, ostensibly the military is there to prevent an outside force from seizing control over the mechanisms of government. Although, I am not so certain that the military is equipped to stop bureaucrats and deep state operatives.

Now, let’s take a quick look at a few dictionary definitions of terrorism.

Terrorism:

1- the unlawful use of violence or threats to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or government, with the goal of furthering political, social, or ideological objectives.

2 – the state of fear and submission produced by terrorism.

3- a terrorist method of governing or of resisting a government.

intimidation or coercion by instilling fear:

Yes, I know, the media and the government seem to fit this definition too, as well as several government agencies. We’ll table that for now. First, we’ll deal with WHO.

Back in May, the Biden administration was pushing amendments to the current WHO treaty that would apparently have given the organization the right in a future pandemic to global martial law, and the ability to force masks, lockdowns, and vaccines or Covid gene therapy shots. These measures were defeated for now, but WHO has a draft treaty out there for 2024. Some might consider the Biden administration’s attempts to cede national sovereignty to a global organization high treason, but we’ll leave that for another discussion.

An organization such as WHO seeking to seize control over our government appears to meet our basic definition of a national security threat. I would also argue that seeking the power to lock people in their homes and force them to wear a face diaper or take a dangerous Covid gene therapy shot, places this organization in the definition of a terrorist organization. WHO has promoted a steady campaign of terror. Terror has been a great component of the Covid narrative. I think it is fair to brand this organization a terrorist organization too.

Read the Whole Article